Paul Libbrecht wrote:
You're underestimating the eclipse deployment.
Am I? I don't think so. I am not talking about general use of
subversion, I am talking about use of svn to manage jakarta-commons
projects. The only problematic use case I've found with subeclipse is
adding a project to a
+1
On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 13:31 -0500, Tim O'Brien wrote:
Alright a sufficient amount of time has passed for public comments and
testing.
This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote
passes, I'll contact Justin and schedule the least disruptive migration
time possible.
+1
-Mark Diggory
Jerome Jar wrote:
+1
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:31:17 -0500, Tim O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright a sufficient amount of time has passed for public comments and
testing.
This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote
passes, I'll contact Justin and schedule
+1 - it really has proved its worth with Struts
Don
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:14:12 -0500, Mark R. Diggory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
-Mark Diggory
Jerome Jar wrote:
+1
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:31:17 -0500, Tim O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright a sufficient amount of time
+1
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:31:17 -0500, Tim O'Brien wrote:
Alright a sufficient amount of time has passed for public comments
and testing.
This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote
passes, I'll contact Justin and schedule the least disruptive
migration time possible.
Tim O'Brien wrote:
Alright a sufficient amount of time has passed for public comments and
testing.
This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote
passes, I'll contact Justin and schedule the least disruptive migration
time possible.
+0
I have never used Subversion yet, so I'll
On 23 Jan 2005, at 03:31, peter royal wrote:
On Jan 22, 2005, at 10:25 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
If you're an IDE-only developer and you don't care about backing out
changes, merging, refactoring, or tagging and branching, then you
might have a point about a winning proposition for the developer.
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 23 Jan 2005, at 03:31, peter royal wrote:
On Jan 22, 2005, at 10:25 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
If you're an IDE-only developer and you don't care about backing out
changes, merging, refactoring, or tagging and branching, then you
might have a point about a winning
I haven't followed every bit of the thread on the SVN migration, but
I just want to echo Martin Cooper's sentiments: once you start using
it, you realize how badly CVS was in need of an overhaul. For
Struts, not only have there been no committers who have mentioned any
significant problems in
+0
I am using eclipse and tried subclipse. Well, it worked, though it is
not by far as mature as eclipse's built in CVS support. Hope this will
change in the future.
For now: Does anybody know a way of automatically setting those
svn:eol-style properties? I keep forgetting this.
Oliver
Tim
+1
David
--- Tim O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright a sufficient amount of time has passed for public comments and
testing.
This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote
passes, I'll contact Justin and schedule the least disruptive migration
time possible.
+1
Mauro.
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:03:35 +0100, Oliver Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+0
I am using eclipse and tried subclipse. Well, it worked, though it is
not by far as mature as eclipse's built in CVS support. Hope this will
change in the future.
For now: Does anybody know a way of
+1
... and let's enjoy the return to command-line! ;-
(just kidding, honestly)
paul
Le 22 janv. 05, à 19:31, Tim O'Brien a écrit :
Alright a sufficient amount of time has passed for public comments and
testing.
This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote
passes, I'll contact
+1.
Subclipse worked fine for me, and I never trust IDEs to do
tagging/branching/scripts anyway.
IDEA will have it asap (else they'll lose customers to Eclipse) and
none of the other IDEs are interesting enough to matter :)
Hen
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:01:50 +0100, Paul Libbrecht [EMAIL
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tim O'Brien write
s:
This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote
I can only express my opinion here. ...but whether I talk
about our experiences over at cocoon or my experiences with
other repositories.
...even if subclipse is not yet comparable with the
excellent cvs client that comes with
Tim O'Brien wrote:
Alright a sufficient amount of time has passed for public comments and
testing.
This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote
passes, I'll contact Justin and schedule the least disruptive migration
time possible.
Tim O'Brien
You're underestimating the eclipse deployment.
All friends I know who use Windows have no other ways of using cvs than
Eclipse... (they know they can do differently but...).
But the migration is clearly going to tighten the wish for maturity of
Subclipse
paul
Le 24 janv. 05, à 00:35, Steve
On Jan 23, 2005, at 7:24 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
so, for those who use IDEs who would suffer if we moved to subversion
now, i have two questions:
i wouldn't say i would suffer, just that i wouldn't pull the trigger
right now (but i'm not going to block forward progress)
would an extra
Developers List
Subject: [all][VOTE] svn migration
Alright a sufficient amount of time has passed for public comments and
testing.
This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote
passes, I'll contact Justin and schedule the least disruptive migration
time possible.
Tim O'Brien
+1
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:31:17 -0500, Tim O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright a sufficient amount of time has passed for public comments and
testing.
This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote
passes, I'll contact Justin and schedule the least disruptive
Alright a sufficient amount of time has passed for public comments and
testing.
This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote
passes, I'll contact Justin and schedule the least disruptive migration
time possible.
Tim O'Brien
+1
--
Martin Cooper
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:31:17 -0500, Tim O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright a sufficient amount of time has passed for public comments and
testing.
This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote
passes, I'll contact Justin and schedule the least
+1
Phil
Tim O'Brien wrote:
Alright a sufficient amount of time has passed for public comments and
testing.
This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote
passes, I'll contact Justin and schedule the least disruptive migration
time possible.
Tim O'Brien
-0.9 (ie. in offical ASF voting its only a -0)
I feel like I'm being forced over the edge of a cliff. I hope I'm wrong.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: Tim O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alright a sufficient amount of time has passed for public comments and
testing.
This is a vote thread
+1
Looking forward to using SVN. As long as Subclipse is up to par, that is :-)
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
-0.9 (ie. in offical ASF voting its only a -0)
I feel like I'm being forced over the edge of a cliff. I hope I'm wrong.
Stephen
- Original Message - From: Tim O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 22, 2005, at 20:38, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
I feel like I'm being forced over the edge of a cliff. I hope I'm
wrong.
Once you are over that cliff, look at the scenery:
http://www.edgewall.com/trac/
Cheers
--
PA
http://alt.textdrive.com/
I'm -0.
I'm hoping all the stability issues are resolved, as it's only been a
week or so since the frequent outages stopped.
Subclipse is bearable and hopefully getting better.
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:31:17 -0500, Tim O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright a sufficient amount of time has
On Jan 22, 2005, at 1:31 PM, Tim O'Brien wrote:
Alright a sufficient amount of time has passed for public comments and
testing.
This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote
passes, I'll contact Justin and schedule the least disruptive migration
time possible.
-0
don't see it
-0
I'd prefer to wait until we know Eclipse support (Subclipse or
otherwise) is on par with CVS support.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 10:31 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [all][VOTE] svn migration
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:43:23 -0500, peter royal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 22, 2005, at 1:31 PM, Tim O'Brien wrote:
Alright a sufficient amount of time has passed for public comments and
testing.
This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote
passes, I'll contact
On Jan 22, 2005, at 10:25 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
If you're an IDE-only developer and you don't care about backing out
changes, merging, refactoring, or tagging and branching, then you
might have a point about a winning proposition for the developer.
But once you've experienced SVN's atomic
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 13:31 -0500, Tim O'Brien wrote:
Alright a sufficient amount of time has passed for public comments and
testing.
This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote
passes, I'll contact Justin and schedule the least disruptive migration
time possible.
+1
don't see it is a winning value proposition for the developer until
tools catch up (specifically IDEA in my case and catching up is
built-in support equivalent to CVS)
+0
Even if the tool support isnt that good today I would like to see the
svn migration. I think this is a chicken-egg
35 matches
Mail list logo
