Hello,
this looks like a Java2 security problem. Two options:
Hack: Disable Java2 security.
Clean: grant your application the necessary permissions
in the java.policy file
The file should be in ${JAVA_HOME}/jre/lib/security/
I hope someone else can come up with the exact
permission
Michael Czeiszperger wrote:
java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
Caused by: org.apache.commons.logging.LogConfigurationException:
org.apache.commons.logging.LogConfigurationException: Class
org.apache.comons.logging.impl.Jdk14Logger does not implement Log
This happens when there is an old
On 30/1/04 1:32 AM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Oleg,
from a technical standpoint, host and port would be sufficient
to differentiate between a proxy and HTTP server on the same
machine.
Actually it's not. It's quite possible to have a proxy and a webserver
running on the
On Jan 30, 2004, at 3:44 AM, Ortwin Glück wrote:
Michael Czeiszperger wrote:
java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
Caused by: org.apache.commons.logging.LogConfigurationException:
org.apache.commons.logging.LogConfigurationException: Class
org.apache.comons.logging.impl.Jdk14Logger does not
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10794.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Adrian,
All right. I give up. Evil Comrade Oleg will leave HttpState alone ;-) Besides, Roland
has made a good point. It may be a bit cumbersome to set default proxy and host
credentials if all credentials are kept in the same pool.
Oleg
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Sutton
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10794.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Folks,
Did I say something glaringly stupid in my message below? It's been a week since I
sent this request. I have not received a single response so far. Any idea what may be
wrong? Or are our infrastructure folks simply too overwhelmed these days sorting out
MyDoom mess? Shall I forward the
I see nothing wrong with your original email. Perhaps an email to
commons-dev would be helpful.
Mike
On Jan 30, 2004, at 11:57 AM, Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:
Folks,
Did I say something glaringly stupid in my message below? It's been a
week since I sent this request. I have not received a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10794.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10794.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10794.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26139.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Jan 29, 2004, at 5:10 PM, Michael Becke wrote:
Looks like a class loader problem. My guess is that commons-logging
is being loaded by more than one class loader.
I figured that since HttpClient uses JUnit for its test suite that
HttpClient had to be compatible with JUnit. Here's the most
Thanks kindly for the reponse. Just one small
follow-up question. What am I granting
permission to access what?
Much thanks - Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:18:40 +0100
To: Commons HttpClient Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
15 matches
Mail list logo