Re: You can at.....

2003-01-29 Thread Joe Schaefer
Dirk-Willem van Gulik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So I'll do the deed - any objections to inviting Tim in here ? Feel free to drop Tim of the Cc to preserve dignity/privacy. I wouldn't mind if you also forget to unsubscribe him after this discussion ends. -- Joe Schaefer

Re: You can at.....

2003-01-29 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On 28 Jan 2003, Joe Schaefer wrote: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So I'll do the deed - any objections to inviting Tim in here ? Feel free to drop Tim of the Cc to preserve dignity/privacy. I wouldn't mind if you also forget to unsubscribe him after this discussion

Re: You can at.....

2003-01-29 Thread Joe Schaefer
Dirk-Willem van Gulik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 28 Jan 2003, Joe Schaefer wrote: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So I'll do the deed - any objections to inviting Tim in here ? Feel free to drop Tim of the Cc to preserve dignity/privacy. I wouldn't mind if you

RE: You can at.....

2003-01-29 Thread Martin van den Bemt
+1 Get the guy in :) Mvgr, Martin -Original Message- From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 01:30 To: community@apache.org Cc: O'brien, Tim Subject: Re: You can at. On 28 Jan 2003, Joe Schaefer wrote: Dirk-Willem

RE: Open community (was ... secret discussions ...)

2003-01-29 Thread Noel J. Bergman
In the community@ archives you can find the vote on whether this list should be open or closed. WHAT archives? As I have commented on before, eyebrowse has none for community@ (http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SummarizeList?listId=108). Are they elsewhere? If so, where? --- Noel

Re: Open community (was ... secret discussions ...)

2003-01-29 Thread Ben Hyde
Didn't we settle this most contentious issue some time ago with a few megabytes of text and a long complex vote coupled with a solid turn out? If so it's painful and cruel to reopen the issue. - ben

Re: CLOSED: Closing the infrastructure list ( was RE: infrastructure@ missing from eyebrowse )

2003-01-29 Thread Aaron Bannert
Too bad, the community@ list advocated it and should therefore maintain it. You're welcome to call a vote to invite him (here's my +1) -aaron On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 06:06 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: He cannot take it up on community@ -- that list is closed as well. He's not a

Re: You can at.....

2003-01-29 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Steven Noels wrote: Related to that: _who_ is able to request access for invited parties? AFAIK Anyone on this list. Or at least that was the consensus after 150Mbyte or more of dicussion on open and closedness :-) Dw.

Re: You can at.....

2003-01-29 Thread Steven Noels
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Steven Noels wrote: Related to that: _who_ is able to request access for invited parties? AFAIK Anyone on this list. Or at least that was the consensus after 150Mbyte or more of dicussion on open and closedness :-) I just saw Stefano's vote round

RE: Adding community@ archives was Open community (was ... secret discussions ...)

2003-01-29 Thread Noel J. Bergman
We're not really trying to hide anything. What you might be able to attribute to malice, attribute to, umm, absentmindedness. For the record, malice never occured to me as an option. I'd asked about archives previously, without a response. So when the comment was ever so casually made that

Re: Adding community@ archives was Open community (was ... secret discussions ...)

2003-01-29 Thread Brian Behlendorf
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: It's probably an oversight, nothing more. Drop a message to apmail@ (oh heck, I'll CC them in this message right now) and they should be able to set it up. Also community@ should be added to the publically available archives in

Re: ASF Colocation proposal

2003-01-29 Thread Steven Noels
Roy T. Fielding wrote: In any case, being a charity is only justified if individuals are contributing money. Right now, they aren't. Would that be as simple as opening up some PayPall account? I'm sure some of use would be happy to contribute something. With the current intention of getting our

Re: You can at.....

2003-01-29 Thread Joe Schaefer
Steven Noels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: So I'll do the deed - any objections to inviting Tim in here ? As the factual proposer: sure! Noone objects to Tim's invitation. I personally would like to ensure that since he's here now, he can also expect to stay

Re: [poll] weblog package on apache.org ?

2003-01-29 Thread Ben Hyde
Henri Gomez wrote: Questions : - Did there is a need for a weblog package installed at apache.org where commiters could put notes about THEIR ASF related works ? I have no problem with PMCs having weblogs as part of their public face. I am concerned that this diverts attention from the code

Re: Adding community@ archives was Open community (was ... secret discussions ...)

2003-01-29 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Brian Behlendorf wrote: On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: It's probably an oversight, nothing more. Drop a message to apmail@ (oh heck, I'll CC them in this message right now) and they should be able to set it up. Also community@ should be added to the publically available

[poll] weblog package on apache.org

2003-01-29 Thread Henri Gomez
Let's (re)start the poll here since it's the commiters list was innapropriate ;( Subject: weblog package on apache.org The goal of this poll is to get commiters feedback on having a weblog package on apache.org. The basic idea is to provide ASF commiters a tool which could be used to expose their

Re: [poll] weblog package on apache.org

2003-01-29 Thread Costin Manolache
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Henri Gomez wrote: - Did there is a need for a weblog package installed at apache.org where commiters could put notes about THEIR ASF related works ? +1 I don't think it is a need - but it would be a good idea. I know there are free or cheap hosting sites - but the

Re: [poll] weblog package on apache.org ?

2003-01-29 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Thom May wrote: - Should we select a Java based solution (the request came from jakarta-general initially), or anything else ? I think this question and the following one are premature. We need to agree on the necessity of *having* committer or project blogging before discussing what

Re: [poll] weblog package on apache.org

2003-01-29 Thread Steven Noels
Henri Gomez wrote: Let's (re)start the poll here since it's the commiters list was innapropriate ;( Sure thing ;) Subject: weblog package on apache.org The goal of this poll is to get commiters feedback on having a weblog package on apache.org. The basic idea is to provide ASF commiters a tool

Re: Open community (was ... secret discussions ...)

2003-01-29 Thread Joshua Slive
Ben Hyde said: Didn't we settle this most contentious issue some time ago with a few megabytes of text and a long complex vote coupled with a solid turn out? If so it's painful and cruel to reopen the issue. - ben I've already apologized twice for rehashing an old issue, but that is

RE: Open community (was ... secret discussions ...)

2003-01-29 Thread Sander Striker
From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:27 PM Ben Hyde said: Didn't we settle this most contentious issue some time ago with a few megabytes of text and a long complex vote coupled with a solid turn out? If so it's painful and cruel to reopen the

RE: Open community (was ... secret discussions ...)

2003-01-29 Thread Martin van den Bemt
And no, allowing invited guests does not eliminate either problem. I'm not sure this is the type of community that I want to participate in. Live with it, unsubscribe or put up a vote to have it your way. Just stop complaining about it. Mvgr, Martin

Re: Open community (was ... secret discussions ...)

2003-01-29 Thread Ben Hyde
Joshua Slive wrote: Ben Hyde said: Didn't we settle this most contentious issue some time ago with a few megabytes of text and a long complex vote coupled with a solid turn out? If so it's painful and cruel to reopen the issue. - ben I've already apologized twice for rehashing an old issue, but

Re: Open community (was ... secret discussions ...)

2003-01-29 Thread David Reid
1. The list is, at minimum, terribly misnamed. Yes. It has been a misnomer from the start. And that was debated at great (and extremely painful) length on the reorg@ list before the new list was setup. Remember the community@ list was supposed to be a cure for many of the ills that people

Re: Open community (was ... secret discussions ...)

2003-01-29 Thread David Reid
And no, allowing invited guests does not eliminate either problem. I'm not sure this is the type of community that I want to participate in. Live with it, unsubscribe or put up a vote to have it your way. Just stop complaining about it. Do people actually believe that having a poll

Re: [poll] weblog package on apache.org

2003-01-29 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
David Reid wrote: [...] I wish people would stop doing this... Nicola - while I appreciate your wish to push your project (don't we all) what you're talking about and what I was talking about are totally different! The project in itself has nothing to do with it. I'm just saying that there are

RE: Open community (was ... secret discussions ...)

2003-01-29 Thread Martin van den Bemt
sorry, but not only has this been a really bad week for me, but i'm bloody well sick and tired of people using this list to look back on what they (as a minority) thought was done wrong, You can make any comment you like this week Ken :) Thanx for warning us..

Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread Ben Hyde
I wonder if we could do something fun. I think it would be fun to have a map that shows where the various people in the community are located on the planet. My fuzzy idea is that members of the community would put ICBM tags[1] on some web page of their. That can drive the map building. Use

RE: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Cool +1.. I've already setup geoUrl so the headers are in place. (except for the ASF-KIND though) Mvgr, Martin -Original Message- From: Ben Hyde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 19:58 To: community@apache.org Subject: Where are we? I wonder if we could

Re: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread Ben Hyde
Actually we could skip the ASF-KIND boondoggle at first too. At that point the only thing we need is to collect URL's that have the icbm info in them. This will make so much easier for the authorities when the time comes! - ben On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 02:03 PM, Martin van den

Re: [poll] weblog package on apache.org

2003-01-29 Thread David N. Welton
David Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Did there is a need for a weblog package installed at apache.org where commiters could put notes about THEIR ASF related works ? -1 A blog (in the context it's being pushed now) is (IMHO) really just another outlet for news on a project that

Re: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread David Reid
Do we have to be truthful and honest? :) Maybe we could have one that shows where we'd *like* to be... david - Original Message - From: Ben Hyde [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: community@apache.org Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:11 PM Subject: Re: Where are we? Actually we could skip the

Re: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Wednesday, January 29, 2003 19:15:16 + David Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do we have to be truthful and honest? :) Maybe we could have one that shows where we'd *like* to be... In your case, we could show where your plane is. 40,000ft above the Atlantic Ocean in the middle of

Re: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread Thom May
* Justin Erenkrantz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : --On Wednesday, January 29, 2003 19:15:16 + David Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do we have to be truthful and honest? :) Maybe we could have one that shows where we'd *like* to be... In your case, we could show where your plane is.

Re: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread Ben Hyde
[1] http://geourl.com/ ekk! I meant:http://geourl.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Just heard a plain is perfect for spec writing :) (Dirk-Willem?) The result is called PLOP (for belgians and dutch people with kids : Nee geen Kabouter Plop!) See http://www-nrc.nokia.com/mail-archive/ietf-spatial/msg00358.html for details :) Mvgr, Martin -Original Message- From:

Re: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread David Reid
* Justin Erenkrantz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : Do we have to be truthful and honest? :) Maybe we could have one that shows where we'd *like* to be... In your case, we could show where your plane is. 40,000ft above the Atlantic Ocean in the middle of nowhere. =) -- justin Hmm, I

Re: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread Ben Hyde
Never right specs in a fright container. On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 02:36 PM, Martin van den Bemt wrote: Just heard a plain is perfect for spec writing :) (Dirk-Willem?) The result is called PLOP (for belgians and dutch people with kids : Nee geen Kabouter Plop!) See

Re: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread Steven Noels
Ben Hyde wrote: I wonder if we could do something fun. I think it would be fun to have a map that shows where the various people in the community are located on the planet. enthusiast +1 My fuzzy idea is that members of the community would put ICBM tags[1] on some web page of their. That can

Re: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread Ceki Gülcü
What do URLs have to do with Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles? Does not compute. At 14:11 29.01.2003 -0500, you wrote: Actually we could skip the ASF-KIND boondoggle at first too. At that point the only thing we need is to collect URL's that have the icbm info in them. This will make so

Re: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread Thom May
* Ben Hyde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : I wonder if we could do something fun. I think it would be fun to have a map that shows where the various people in the community are located on the planet. me like :-) +1 -Thom -

Re: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Ben Hyde wrote: I wonder if we could do something fun. I think it would be fun to have a map that shows where the various people in the community are located on the planet. My fuzzy idea is that members of the community would put ICBM tags[1] on some web page of their. That can drive

Re: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread Steven Noels
Ben Hyde wrote: % cvs -d cvs.apache.org:/home/cvs co committers % echo 'http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/' committers/urls.txt % cvs ci -m 'Add Ben' committers/urls.txt done, I added my account ID so that maybe Sam Jim can pick up that file and use it for their committer/member overview, too That's

RE: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Done for me too.. Mvgr, Martin -Original Message- From: Steven Noels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 21:49 To: community@apache.org Subject: Re: Where are we? Ben Hyde wrote: % cvs -d cvs.apache.org:/home/cvs co committers % echo

Re: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread Sander Temme
My fuzzy idea is that members of the community would put ICBM tags[1] on some web page of their. That can drive the map building. Use the [1] http://geourl.com/ That lands me on a domain squatter. It's a cool idea, but I'm a little apprehensive about being targeted by ICBMs... S. --

Re: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread Ben Hyde
Steven Noels wrote: That's about as low on the food chain as we can go 'knowledge representation' wise. Should we climb higher, and if so ... why? nope, KISS Lies! Ok so the file is in /etc/passwd style with three columns separated by colons. The first field is your cvs.apache.org login id,

[PROPOSE] Identify and describe community@ on site

2003-01-29 Thread O'brien, Tim
It is proposed that the community list be archived through Eyebrowse on nagoya, and it is also proposed that the following patch be applied to the Foundation's mailing list page on www.apache.org. A patch is included to this effect. PATCH BEGINS HERE: Index: mailinglists.xml

Re: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread David N. Welton
Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What do URLs have to do with Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles? Does not compute. Really... who wants to parse up some file, and have a spider visit a bunch of sites just to get the same information that could have been put in a file on cvs.apache.org or

Re: ASF Colocation proposal

2003-01-29 Thread Lars Eilebrecht
According to Steven Noels: Would that be as simple as opening up some PayPall account? We are actually in the process of doing this. ciao... -- Lars Eilebrecht - Reality does not exist... yet. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: ASF Colocation proposal

2003-01-29 Thread O'brien, Tim
According to Steven Noels: Would that be as simple as opening up some PayPall account? We are actually in the process of doing this. I don't know if anyone is interested in selling swag, but I found this: http://www.cafeshops.com/cp/store.aspx?s=freebsdgear It is fairly easy to setup,

RE: ASF Colocation proposal

2003-01-29 Thread Martin van den Bemt
I believe Ken has a shop for that stuff already (thought I found the shop via his site at least) Mvgr, Martin -Original Message- From: O'brien, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 23:39 To: community@apache.org Subject: RE: ASF Colocation proposal

Re: ASF Colocation proposal

2003-01-29 Thread Henri Yandell
Hmm. There was another site selling them, which had rather poor user feedback: http://www.copyleft.net/item.phtml?page=product_966_front.phtml Ken's is: http://apache-server.com/store.html Others: http://apache.covalent.net/store/t.php http://geekt.org/geekt/comment.cgi?newsid=1197 Hen On

Re: ASF Colocation proposal

2003-01-29 Thread Henri Yandell
So when will there be a Jakarta t-shirt available? :) Hen On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Erik Abele wrote: Martin van den Bemt wrote: I believe Ken has a shop for that stuff already (thought I found the shop via his site at least) http://apache-server.com/store.html

Re: ASF Colocation proposal

2003-01-29 Thread David N. Welton
Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So when will there be a Jakarta t-shirt available? :) We'd certainly like to see a Rivet T-shirt with this guy, (created by lokitech.com) :-) http://tcl.apache.org/rivet/logos/idea9.jpg -- David N. Welton Consulting: http://www.dedasys.com/

Re: Where are we?

2003-01-29 Thread David Crossley
David N. Welton wrote: Ceki Gülcü writes: What do URLs have to do with Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles? Does not compute. Really... who wants to parse up some file, and have a spider visit a bunch of sites just to get the same information that could have been put in a file on