Erik Abele wrote:
On 26.04.2005, at 19:48, Shane Curcuru wrote:
Here's a brilliant idea! I'd love to find a wiki that also supports
updates via some sort of geek-oriented interface, like CVS or SVN.
That way, we could please both the millions of folks who like using
the web - and can usually
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 8:45 AM
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
...
Again, a list is fine. I'd just prefer to find someone
else to host it:
the ASF isn't the end-all-be-all to all of your hosting
needs. And,
obviously, feel free
From: David Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 5:25 AM
I wonder if we can give such a list some focus.
Doing just python is too broad.
We could limit to discuss tools that will help with
maintaining the Apache infrastructure. Of course Gump,
wiki-farm,
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 16:22, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, BAZLEY, Sebastian wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Daniel L. Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2004 17:32
To: community@apache.org
Subject: Subversion 1.0
Seeing as how there is already a
On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 18:21, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I think it would be most appropriate for the ASF
to send some sort of condolences to the Pöschl
family (eg: flowers).
I agree.
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 20:11, Sander Temme wrote:
Let's just register planetapache.org and be done with it.
+1
+1
Would the Foundation handle that, and host it, or would that have to be a
private initiative?
Didn't thom already do it?
Sander
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 18:26, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Do people want the newsletter to continue? If so then I'm happy
to edit the Oct/Nov issue with no promises to tackle subsequent
issues - aiming to publish in a week or so.
+1 and much
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:11 AM
OK. Here's my submission:
http://www.red-bean.com/fitz/ac2003.jpg
Nice!
The colors got a little tweaked when I converted to JPG, but that can be
fixed, and if people think it's too busy, I can
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 11:53 PM
At least, projects@incubator.apache.org and
jaxme-dev@ws.apache.org have wrong configurations.
Please fix and notify it of the participants of
these mailing lists after that.
The owners of those
From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 11:59 AM
I don't think David and Sander did such a bad thing, they expressed
their opinion, but I disliked the way they did and I wanted to
apologize for the feeling you got out of this.
You felt sad but
From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:03 PM
[...]
I asked Incubator PMC to give me a karma to do the
same thing to incubator-site, however, they did not
give me a karma it seems. As a result, incubator-site
is still less cooperative to that
From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 4:20 PM
[...]
P.S. Personally, I advertised the ApacheCon at PHP-user groups
in Japan the other day. I'd like to suggest you, Ceki, to solicit
the advice and cooperation from the PHP folks, too.
That is an
If anyone's counting a show of hands here I'm a European and +1 to opposing
software patents in Europe and +1 to the ASF supporting the demo.
+1
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
From: Gianugo Rabellino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:47 PM
Andrew Savory wrote:
http://petition.eurolinux.org. You will be redirected automatically to
this site homepage in 60 seconds (or you can reach it directly by
clicking a href=...here/a).
From: Sander Striker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:55 PM
Hmmm. I was more thinking all or nothing. If the board approves, swap
the main httpd.conf for a config that will serve only this page. We
swap configs again when the protest is over (a day?).
Then again
From: David Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 3:02 PM
Can we move discussions about newsletters to another mailing list?
I know I'm not alone in finding that while some here will be interested,
many aren't interested in assisting though will happily read the
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:52 AM
There's the committers module. Every committer has access to this one.
On 19.06.2003 05:09:39 Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Why NOT have shared documents? I've heard it said that the CVS organization
is the
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:00 AM
Greg Stein wrote, On 10/06/2003 21.01:
ObPlug
Use Subversion.
/ObPlug
:-)
Cry4Help
Release the baby!
/Cry4Help
;-)
Once Karl has finished up the branch/tag support in cvs2svn we can
do
From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:31 AM
One of the previous concerns was tool support. Since then, we have SVN
capability in ViewCVS, and there is also an SVN plugin for Eclipse and IDEA,
and several GUIs. SVN itself has been stable for a long
From: Andrew Savory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew
Savory
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 12:31 PM
Hi,
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
However if we start seeing de-facings which take days to be noticed; then
we'll propably need to start adding some more
From: David N. Welton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 9:35 AM
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I wonder is how many of those authors/copyright-holders have
actually read the GPL and understand what it really means. --
justin
Probably not the
From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:33 PM
--On Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:12 PM -0500 Noel J. Bergman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
enough to do with keeping the plant running. The documents should
live in either Incubator (to be
From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:27 PM
Ben Hyde said:
Didn't we settle this most contentious issue some time ago with a few
megabytes of text and a long complex vote coupled with a solid turn
out? If so it's painful and cruel to reopen the
From: Ben Hyde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 5:34 PM
On Saturday, January 4, 2003, at 03:39 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Right, I don't object to you contributing CVS mail patches. I just am
not interested in doing it myself.
I'm not trying to be nasty just
From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 December 2002 22:23
Sander Striker wrote:
Which is simply not the case if not all committers and members are
represented
on there.
Here is an effort that I made last year http://cvs.apache.org/~rubys/
Here is much move visually
From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 December 2002 22:49
Sander Striker wrote:
Right now the homepages aren't linked to from anywhere and certainly
not promoted. Creating the dns entry will seem like promoting the use
of the homepages.
Yes, that's exactly
From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 December 2002 16:56
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, December 2, 2002 8:39 AM +0100 Nicola Ken Barozzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think we are talking about complete personal websites with
blogs and such, with rants and
From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 December 2002 16:34
Yeah.. I'm confused...what does ANY of the issues brought up have to do
with creating the dns entry? It seems some folks are voting/debating
the home directories themselves. Those are already there and I assume
From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 December 2002 18:56
Sander Striker wrote:
Right now the homepages aren't linked to from anywhere and certainly
not promoted.
url:http://cvs.apache.org/~coar/people.html, updated nightly, and
certainly transformable
From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 December 2002 19:43
Sander Striker wrote:
url:http://cvs.apache.org/~coar/people.html, updated nightly, and
certainly transformable into a more 'official' process.
Should've seen that one comming. However, you have to know
From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 November 2002 23:30
--On Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:34:00 -0800 Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to propose the creation of the 'community.apache.org' web
site.
Currently, some people have their
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[X] -1 no, let's keep it private
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully
32 matches
Mail list logo
