Re: Inexpensive Lists (was: Re: Python anybody?)

2004-07-22 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 6:22 PM -0400 Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: list. Go read groklaw. However, discussions on whether a python community should exist seem to be perfectly designed for the community list (unless they

Re: Python anybody?

2004-07-21 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
I've submit: http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-95 Let's see what transpires. regards Adam - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Inexpensive Lists (was: Re: Python anybody?)

2004-07-21 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Sunday, July 18, 2004 4:20 PM -0400 Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suspect that if 3 ASF'ers want to discuss a topic via email, and think a mailing list would help, there should be a mechanism to simply have it created, bang. Just my 2 cents =) Mailing lists without PMC

Re: Inexpensive Lists (was: Re: Python anybody?)

2004-07-21 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: community@apache.org Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 12:03 PM Subject: Re: Inexpensive Lists (was: Re: Python anybody?) --On Sunday, July 18, 2004 4:20 PM -0400 Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suspect that if 3 ASF'ers want

Re: Inexpensive Lists (was: Re: Python anybody?)

2004-07-21 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 12:54 PM -0600 Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) I might've missed a better place to post, I don't think so. I thought about it for a while, and this was the best I came up with. So if you know of one, then maybe I'm simply clueless, not lazy. Otherwise,

Re: Inexpensive Lists (was: Re: Python anybody?)

2004-07-21 Thread Henri Yandell
Do you have the same feelings for [EMAIL PROTECTED] It seems to me that members@ is akin to a community-dev list, while community@ is akin to a community-users list. Any reason to keep members@ should exist for [EMAIL PROTECTED] I agree that MS Patent stuff is boring and unnecessary on a

Re: Inexpensive Lists (was: Re: Python anybody?)

2004-07-19 Thread Brian McCallister
Happily! Let me know what is done now, and I'll see if I can make it more easily automated. -Brian On Jul 18, 2004, at 5:12 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: the list was made the moment it was needed. It *could* be created the moment it was needed. It would be nice if we had such a mechanism. At the

Re: Python anybody?

2004-07-18 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
David wrote: I wonder if we can give such a list some focus. Doing just python is too broad. Until there is too much traffic, I don't see the point of restricting things. Why ought we not talk about pydoc problems, or threading issues, or whatever aspects of Python we need to? I say don't fix

Re: Python anybody?

2004-07-18 Thread David Crossley
Adam R. B. Jack wrote: BTW: Forrestbot is Python? I did not know that, that is interesting, I'll have to go check it out. No it is not Python (but you can still check it out). I was just adding it as one of the other tools. -- David Crossley

Inexpensive Lists (was: Re: Python anybody?)

2004-07-18 Thread Brian McCallister
This discussion, and a recent comment about the new [EMAIL PROTECTED] have had me thinking about ASF infrastructure, etc. The question was asked why start discussion about continuations in the JVM on a codehaus list when most of the people initially involved are ASF'ers, etc? The answer was

RE: Inexpensive Lists (was: Re: Python anybody?)

2004-07-18 Thread Noel J. Bergman
the list was made the moment it was needed. It *could* be created the moment it was needed. It would be nice if we had such a mechanism. At the moment, list creation is a long list of steps that involves 3 servers, each with different access rights. I suspect that if 3 ASF'ers want to

RE: Python anybody?

2004-07-17 Thread Sander Striker
From: David Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 5:25 AM I wonder if we can give such a list some focus. Doing just python is too broad. We could limit to discuss tools that will help with maintaining the Apache infrastructure. Of course Gump, wiki-farm,

Re: Python anybody?

2004-07-16 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
We'll we weren't exactly overwhelmed w/ 'Yup -- gimme Python', but then that is kinda the point, isn't it? If Python was as ubiquitous as Java @ ASF, I doubt we'd need the list/help. A few (maybe more) folk are working in Python for ASF related things, and we need to be able to get whatever help

Re: Python anybody?

2004-07-15 Thread Thom May
* Adam R. B. Jack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : Hi, Are there sufficient ASF folks working in Python (on MoinMoin, or whatever) to warrant something like an ASF focused Python list? [I don't mean mod-python, but I'm not excluding that/them.] I, for one, don't have bandwidth (network nor

Re: Python anybody?

2004-07-15 Thread Henri Yandell
While I'm not highly into python (I like whitespace idea, but knowledge of perl stops me getting too much beyond reading the O'Reilly books), perhaps this would be a way to experiement with the non-project technology focused communities that were talked about a couple of years ago. The one that

Re: Python anybody?

2004-07-15 Thread Scott Sanders
Perhaps we should just start a python list, and if that is successful then Gump and mod_python could co-create the python.apache.org federation (PMC-less organization). I am +1 on a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. Scott On Jul 14, 2004, at 8:55 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: While I'm not highly into python

Python anybody?

2004-07-14 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
Hi, Are there sufficient ASF folks working in Python (on MoinMoin, or whatever) to warrant something like an ASF focused Python list? [I don't mean mod-python, but I'm not excluding that/them.] I, for one, don't have bandwidth (network nor mental) for comp.lang.python, but I'd be interested in