On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Steven Noels wrote:
> > People can do the same with patches on mailing list; and seem less
> > likely to abuse that. Perhaps the simple validation (and display) of
> > a valid email address may do the trick.
>
> The combination of a Wiki (JSPWiki, which offers an XMLRPC inte
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
Our project is getting value out of the Wiki, in part because we
have non-Committers feeling empowered and able to contribute
directly.
People can do the same with patches on mailing list; and seem less
likely to abuse that. Perhaps the simple validation (and displa
> The life of a dyslexic is full of surprises. That should have read
> "This is a bad-thing(tm).."
I had figured as much from the earlier part of the paragraph. :-)
> I assume that as soon as we create per PMC Wiki those PMC would
> discover that they have pride of craft in the content of that
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The control loops on the current wiki are _way_ too open loop and the
resulting systems is prone creating ear damaging noises. This is not
a bad-thing(tm) and likely to lay waste to the good-thing(tm).
How would you amend the process?
The life of a dyslexic is full of surpri
> Our project is getting value out of the Wiki, in part because we have
> non-Committers feeling empowered and able to contribute directly.
People can do the same with patches on mailing list; and seem less likely
to abuse that. Perhaps the simple validation (and display) of a valid
email address
Ben,
>>> I continue to believe that the wiki should be per PMC.
>> Responsibility for oversight of content? I agree.
> which would requires some reengineering.
>> ... search across the federated wikispace is a good thing.
>useful input to whom ever grabs the reengineering knife.
Agreed. I'm pret
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Ben Hyde wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Andy gave ... and Ben Hyde admin access.
Wires got crossed someplace and that didn't come to closure. It's
been
a while but it maybe that it stumbled at the get account on nagoya
You don't need a nagoya account to do it.
Possibly, mayb
Ben Hyde wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Andy gave ... and Ben Hyde admin access.
> Wires got crossed someplace and that didn't come to closure. It's been
> a while but it maybe that it stumbled at the get account on nagoya
You don't need a nagoya account to do it. Admin is built into the Wi
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Andy gave ... and Ben Hyde admin access.
Wires got crossed someplace and that didn't come to closure. It's been
a while but it maybe that it stumbled at the get account on nagoya
step? No big deal.
I continue to believe that the wiki should be per PMC. Infrastructure
i
> In my book Andy (Oliver, not Clark) is the master of Wiki...
Andy gave myself and Ben Hyde admin access. From what Andy is saying, his
plan is to give that to anyone (within reason) who asks. I don't
particularly have a care, other than that people ought to know that such
things as deleting an
On 27/1/03 2:50 am, "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just did some cleanup on the Wiki (deleted all pages marked for deletion).
> Is there a need for a wiki@ or wikiadmin@ mailing list, or should admin
> activity be posted to infrastructure? Or doesn't anyone care? ;-) The
> fli
11 matches
Mail list logo
