* Stefano Cavallari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-05 12:20 +0200]:
> FYI, trying
> rm /etc/default/flashkernel
> mkdir /etc/default/flashkernel
> to see if it works as a parmanent (although dirty) fix.
Good idea. I'll do that for now.
--
MiKael
___
O
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 20:56:05 Mikael Berthe wrote:
[...]
> So Qtopia's postinst script contains
>
> (...)
> if [ -f /etc/default/flashkernel ] ; then
> echo "Upgrading Kernel in Flash"
> echo "DO NOT stop this process"
> (flashing...)
> else
> t
* arne anka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-03 10:48 +0200]:
>
> > I tried to find a kernel package to check but I couldn't find one.
>
> how's that?
> if you don't find a kernel package then probably none would be installed.
> if you got an opkg based distribution installed that already had a kerne
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:06:16 +0200, Mikael Berthe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * arne anka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-02 10:57 +0200]:
>> > I do want opkg to update the kernel, but I don't want it to touch
>> NAND,
>> > because my system is on the SD card.
>>
>> i would expect opkg to update
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 04:06:16 Mikael Berthe wrote:
> I'm afraid that upgrading the kernel on one of the SD card systems could
> flash the NAND kernel (and then the kernel wouldn't match the OM2007.2
> modules).
> Of course there would be a few ways to recover from this situation, but
> if
* arne anka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-02 10:57 +0200]:
> > I do want opkg to update the kernel, but I don't want it to touch NAND,
> > because my system is on the SD card.
>
> i would expect opkg to update the kernel in /boot -- if you boot from sd
> it should be the kernel /boot on your sd,
> I do want opkg to update the kernel, but I don't want it to touch NAND,
> because my system is on the SD card.
i would expect opkg to update the kernel in /boot -- if you boot from sd
it should be the kernel /boot on your sd, if you boot from nand it should
be nand.
how did you design your s
* "Marco Trevisan (Treviño)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-02 06:00 +0200]:
> >
> > I have several systems on the Freerunner and I would like to know if
> > there's a way to prevent opkg from flashing a new kernel to NAND.
> >
> > Is there such an option?
> >
> > I'm currently holding the kernel
Mikael Berthe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have several systems on the Freerunner and I would like to know if
> there's a way to prevent opkg from flashing a new kernel to NAND.
>
> Is there such an option?
>
> I'm currently holding the kernel packages, but it would be better if
> /boot/uImage could be up
* Marcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-01 22:21 +0200]:
> Am Montag 01 September 2008 22:12:03 schrieb Mikael Berthe:
> >
> > I have several systems on the Freerunner and I would like to know if
> > there's a way to prevent opkg from flashing a new kernel to NAND.
> >
> > Is there such an option?
>
Am Montag 01 September 2008 22:12:03 schrieb Mikael Berthe:
> Hi,
>
> I have several systems on the Freerunner and I would like to know if
> there's a way to prevent opkg from flashing a new kernel to NAND.
>
> Is there such an option?
>
> I'm currently holding the kernel packages, but it would be
Hi,
I have several systems on the Freerunner and I would like to know if
there's a way to prevent opkg from flashing a new kernel to NAND.
Is there such an option?
I'm currently holding the kernel packages, but it would be better if
/boot/uImage could be upgraded normally.
--
MiKael
__
12 matches
Mail list logo
