On 7/27/07, Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There might come
Neo1974 or even
Neo2007
Yes. And actually, nijutsu will also tell us about the Neo1907 at some
point :)
FIC vacuum cleaner? Camera? What about the Neo968? Neo1979?
___
On Friday 27 July 2007 13:25:26 Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
OpenMoko-0.5 or whatever scheme is already in place.
-2007 and -2008 so far. We might have 200x.y at some point.
Hm. I think using year-names is not a good choice for software
versions (mainly talking about stable releases).
Gabriel Ambuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
I don't think Ubuntu did very badly with (Y)Y.MM release naming. Except for
the Dapper slippage maybe, but that was warranted by any means... Plus you
can use future dates for unstable (right now the next Ubuntu release is
7.10
I guess one thing
Harald Welte skrev:
Hi!
Since we're now working on the phase 2 neo, i.e. what is now known
officially as Neo1973 GTA02, I'd like to address one issue:
For many information in the public wiki, it is not clear whether it is
1) general information about the openmoko 2007 software
1b) information
Le vendredi 27 juillet 2007 à 18:24 +0800, Harald Welte a écrit :
So, we will have
Neo1973-1.0 = GTA01
Neo1973-2.0 = GTA02
well, please don't add numbers like 1.0/2.0, since that would just lead
to further confusion. I really think it makes sense to use one naming
scheme, and don't
Am 26.07.2007 um 17:53 schrieb Harald Welte:
Hi!
Since we're now working on the phase 2 neo, i.e. what is now known
officially as Neo1973 GTA02, I'd like to address one issue:
For many information in the public wiki, it is not clear whether it is
1) general information about the openmoko
Hi Nikolaus,
thanks for your feedback.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 12:02:26PM +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Well, I think we will have to separate
a) different hardware variants (and subvariants) of the Neo
yes.
b) different software variants (and subvariants) of OpenMoko
yes.
OpenMoko-0.5 or whatever scheme is already in place.
-2007 and -2008 so far. We might have 200x.y at some point.
Hm. I think using year-names is not a good choice for software
versions (mainly talking about stable releases).
It psychologically forces you to do one major release every year.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:25:26PM +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
OpenMoko-0.5 or whatever scheme is already in place.
-2007 and -2008 so far. We might have 200x.y at some point.
Hm. I think using year-names is not a good choice for software versions
(mainly talking about stable
Hi!
Since we're now working on the phase 2 neo, i.e. what is now known
officially as Neo1973 GTA02, I'd like to address one issue:
For many information in the public wiki, it is not clear whether it is
1) general information about the openmoko 2007 software
1b) information about future software
10 matches
Mail list logo
