Re: community Digest, Vol 235, Issue 5

2011-05-16 Thread giacomo 'giotti' mariani
On 05/14/2011 12:00, community-requ...@lists.openmoko.org wrote: and the -verbose option gives: [...] eval: 1: arm-linux-gcc: not found [...] does this work for you like for me? radek@rp-skunk:~$ /opt/toolchains/arm920t-eabi/bin/arm-linux-gcc arm-linux-gcc: no input files Regards

AtMoko v35 incoming SMS tone missing?

2011-05-16 Thread Philip Rhoades
People, I don't get a tone when an SMS arrives - I can't find anything on the phone or googling that mentions this - is this a known issue? Am I missing something? Thanks, Phil. -- Philip Rhoades GPO Box 3411 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au

Re: About QtMoko future

2011-05-16 Thread Philip Rhoades
Radek, On 2011-05-09 21:08, Radek Polak wrote: On Saturday 07 May 2011 17:20:50 Joif wrote: Hi list In the announcement of QtMoko v33 there were some discussions about the future of QtMoko. But to date, I have not a clear vision about the current situation and the future of QtMoko, so I want

Re: community Digest, Vol 235, Issue 5

2011-05-16 Thread Radek Polak
On Monday 16 May 2011 10:37:02 giacomo 'giotti' mariani wrote: On 05/14/2011 12:00, community-requ...@lists.openmoko.org wrote: and the -verbose option gives: [...] eval: 1: arm-linux-gcc: not found [...] does this work for you like for me? radek@rp-skunk:~$

Re: About QtMoko future

2011-05-16 Thread Radek Polak
On Monday 16 May 2011 10:47:56 Philip Rhoades wrote: I try to add QtCreator projects for all new projects and i try to make sure the apps work also on PC where you can debug them easily. I havent looked for more integration like automatic deploy and debugging on the device, but on the

Re: About QtMoko future

2011-05-16 Thread Alfa21-mobile
Then we need debian packages for FSO stack (anyone know if they exists and what is the current status?) and we can start using it. you can look here: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=fsosearchon=namessuite=allsection=all ___ Openmoko

Re: About QtMoko future

2011-05-16 Thread Timo Jyrinki
2011/5/16 Alfa21-mobile freerun...@my.is.it: Then we need debian packages for FSO stack (anyone know if they exists and what is the current status?) and we can start using it. you can look here: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=fsosearchon=namessuite=allsection=all + a few newer

Re: [QtMoko] amd64 compilation trouble

2011-05-16 Thread giacomo 'giotti' mariani
and the -verbose option gives: [...] eval: 1: arm-linux-gcc: not found [...] does this work for you like for me? radek at rp-skunk:~$ /opt/toolchains/arm920t-eabi/bin/arm-linux-gcc arm-linux-gcc: no input files Regards Radek Hi Radek, Yes, it behaves

Re: [QtMoko] amd64 compilation trouble

2011-05-16 Thread Ed Kapitein
Hi Giacomo, There might be something wrong with the libraries, can you check with: ldd /opt/toolchains/arm920t-eabi/bin/arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.3 Kind regards, Ed On Monday 16 May 2011 14:44:31 giacomo 'giotti' mariani wrote: and the -verbose option gives: [...] eval: 1:

Re: [QtMoko] amd64 compilation trouble

2011-05-16 Thread giacomo 'giotti' mariani
Hi Ed Hi Giacomo, There might be something wrong with the libraries, can you check with: ldd /opt/toolchains/arm920t-eabi/bin/arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.3 Kind regards, Ed here the output of ldd follows: jack@nb2-mariani:~$ ldd /opt/toolchains/arm920t-eabi/bin/arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.3

Aurora

2011-05-16 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
NOTE: Cross-posted to three mailing lists, please keep it that way, if you want to reply. Dear FOSS-Telephony lovers, today we want to announce something that has been brewing in our minds for quite a while and will change the way we develop the freesmartphone.org middleware. In the past, FSO

Re: Aurora

2011-05-16 Thread Corey
On Monday, May 16, 2011 09:02:58 AM Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: NOTE: Cross-posted to three mailing lists, please keep it that way, if you want to reply. Aurora is supposed to be something we call a featurephone client – featurephones being those things we used for telephony before

Re: Aurora

2011-05-16 Thread Neil Jerram
On 16 May 2011 17:02, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer mic...@vanille-media.de wrote: NOTE: Cross-posted to three mailing lists, please keep it that way, if you want to reply. If you can persuade them all to accept emails from non-subscribed email addresses... (For weird historical reasons, I'm

Re: Aurora

2011-05-16 Thread Simon Busch
On 16.05.2011 23:22, Neil Jerram wrote: I'm afraid I don't understand. Why not just have SHR as your reference set of applications? If you don't think they are using the FSO APIs in the pattern that you would recommend, presumably you could work with them to correct that? Or, if they are