Chers membres et communauté AFRINIC,
Le Conseil d’administration d'AFRINIC appelle par la présente à l'expression
d'intérêt des personnes souhaitant être prises en considération pour des postes
vacants au sein du Conseil, conformément à l'article 13.14 des Statuts AFRINIC.
Toute nomination à c
Dear AFRINIC Members and community,
The AFRINIC Board hereby calls for expressions of interest from persons who
wish to be considered for appointments to fill casual vacancies in the Board,
in terms of article 13.14 of the AFRINIC Bylaws. Any appointments to these
vacant seats will be for a pe
I disagree with your first paragraph. I was a Board Member when "None of
the Above" was introduced. I was also often on NomCom. The simple idea
behind "None of the Above" is simply that - None of the above - that's
everyone (natural persons) listed on that ballot. It's not just for the
case where t
Hello Board and Legal Counsel,
Good that Omo spotted this.
It’s a matter of applying the board election process adopted by the board
according to section 13.2 of the bylaws.
https://afrinic.net/en/community/elections/bod-election/process describes
the process and section 9 spells out how to inte
Dear Community,
Having “none of above” on the ballot is not the issue.
The real issue is about the candidate with the highest number of votes .
And this is what section 9.2 says:
*
Elections will be closed as soon as the last member or proxy present in the
meeting room casts his/her vote. Candi
Here is what 9.2 of
https://afrinic.net/en/community/elections/bod-election/process full text
says:
9.2 Paper Ballot on Election Day
The voting conducted during the Annual General Members' Meeting is carried
out via paper ballots containing a list of candidate names and a ballot
number. Prior to
On Thu, 17 May 2018, 12:15 p.m. Mark Elkins, wrote:
> I disagree with your first paragraph. I was a Board Member when "None of
> the Above" was introduced. I was also often on NomCom. The simple idea
> behind "None of the Above" is simply that - None of the above - that's
> everyone (natural pers
"none of the above" is there for a reason, it in itself is an entity. If it
was not there what would the purpose of voting be if I did not agree with
any of the candidates?
It in its self is a "candidate" and it won.
It is there for a real reason and is perfectly democratic. How else would
you vot
So let us examine what happen
a) The two current membre of board had no competition
b) Less than 1/3 of membership vote in the election
c) The clear winner is "None of the Above"
I see two problem
Point (b) say that: most member do not care
Point (c) clearly send a message: all those that were
If we read the bye laws as they are written now. To me it would actually mean
that many people did not like the slate offered but an election happened and
there were candidates with high number of votes.
So actually three candidates had high numbers of votes. Though many people did
not like th
All,
The election was run and winner declared. Majority of votes cast to have none
of the candidates join the board.
The AGMM has now closed with no board members being elected.
Neither of the losing candidates have challenged the elections, but they are
free to do so if they wish.
But I live
Dear Members and Community,
Mt views have been sought on the matter under reference.
Please find same hereunder.
On 17/05/2018 14:04, B
*_The Election Process and last AGMM._*
The appointment of Directors is carried out during an AGMM of the
Company –Art 13.1 of the constitution.
The electio
- Candidates with the highest number of votes in each category will be
declared winners
None of the above was not a candidate
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 2:29 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
___
Community-Discuss maili
Sent from my iPhone
On 17 May 2018, at 19:42, Uffa Modey via Community-Discuss
mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net>> wrote:
* Candidates with the highest number of votes in each category will be
declared winners
None of the above was not a candidate
Exactly and the bye laws are silent
>If we actually want to make none of the above a candidate it should be
clearly stated in the bye laws.
It is after all the will of the community.
___
Community-Discuss mailing list
Community-Discuss@afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/m
Sent from my iPhone
On 18 May 2018, at 08:54, Saul Stein
mailto:s...@enetworks.co.za>> wrote:
>If we actually want to make none of the above a candidate it should be clearly
>stated in the bye laws.
It is after all the will of the community.
Then let’s put it specifically in the byelaws but
16 matches
Mail list logo
