Re: community Digest, Vol 235, Issue 5

2011-05-16 Thread giacomo 'giotti' mariani
On 05/14/2011 12:00, community-requ...@lists.openmoko.org wrote: > and the "-verbose" option gives: > [...] > eval: 1: arm-linux-gcc: not found > [...] does this work for you like for me? radek@rp-skunk:~$ /opt/toolchains/arm920t-eabi/bin/arm-linux-gcc arm-linux-gcc: no input files Regard

AtMoko v35 incoming SMS tone missing?

2011-05-16 Thread Philip Rhoades
People, I don't get a tone when an SMS arrives - I can't find anything on the phone or googling that mentions this - is this a known issue? Am I missing something? Thanks, Phil. -- Philip Rhoades GPO Box 3411 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au _

Re: About QtMoko future

2011-05-16 Thread Philip Rhoades
Radek, On 2011-05-09 21:08, Radek Polak wrote: On Saturday 07 May 2011 17:20:50 Joif wrote: Hi list In the announcement of QtMoko v33 there were some discussions about the future of QtMoko. But to date, I have not a clear vision about the current situation and the future of QtMoko, so I want

Re: community Digest, Vol 235, Issue 5

2011-05-16 Thread Radek Polak
On Monday 16 May 2011 10:37:02 giacomo 'giotti' mariani wrote: > On 05/14/2011 12:00, community-requ...@lists.openmoko.org wrote: > >> > and the "-verbose" option gives: > >> > [...] > >> > eval: 1: arm-linux-gcc: not found > >> > [...] > > > > does this work for you like for me? > > > > rade

Re: About QtMoko future

2011-05-16 Thread Radek Polak
On Monday 16 May 2011 10:47:56 Philip Rhoades wrote: > > I try to add QtCreator projects for all new projects and i try to make > > sure the apps work also on PC where you can debug them easily. I havent > > looked for more integration like automatic deploy and debugging on the > > device, but on

Re: About QtMoko future

2011-05-16 Thread Alfa21-mobile
> Then we need debian packages for FSO stack (anyone know if they exists and > what is the current status?) and we can start using it. you can look here: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=fso&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all ___ Openmoko comm

Re: About QtMoko future

2011-05-16 Thread Timo Jyrinki
2011/5/16 Alfa21-mobile : >> Then we need debian packages for FSO stack (anyone know if they exists and >> what is the current status?) and we can start using it. > > you can look here: > > http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=fso&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all + a few newer versions of th

Re: [QtMoko] amd64 compilation trouble

2011-05-16 Thread giacomo 'giotti' mariani
> >> > and the "-verbose" option gives: > >> > [...] > >> > eval: 1: arm-linux-gcc: not found > >> > [...] > > > > does this work for you like for me? > > > > radek at rp-skunk:~$ /opt/toolchains/arm920t-eabi/bin/arm-linux-gcc > > arm-linux-gcc: no input files > > > > > > Regards > > > > Radek

Re: [QtMoko] amd64 compilation trouble

2011-05-16 Thread Ed Kapitein
Hi Giacomo, There might be something wrong with the libraries, can you check with: ldd /opt/toolchains/arm920t-eabi/bin/arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.3 Kind regards, Ed On Monday 16 May 2011 14:44:31 giacomo 'giotti' mariani wrote: > > > >> > and the "-verbose" option gives: > > > >> > [...] > > > >

Re: [QtMoko] amd64 compilation trouble

2011-05-16 Thread giacomo 'giotti' mariani
Hi Ed Hi Giacomo, There might be something wrong with the libraries, can you check with: ldd /opt/toolchains/arm920t-eabi/bin/arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.3 Kind regards, Ed here the output of ldd follows: jack@nb2-mariani:~$ ldd /opt/toolchains/arm920t-eabi/bin/arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.3 linu

Aurora

2011-05-16 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
NOTE: Cross-posted to three mailing lists, please keep it that way, if you want to reply. Dear FOSS-Telephony lovers, today we want to announce something that has been brewing in our minds for quite a while and will change the way we develop the freesmartphone.org middleware. In the past, FSO ha

Re: Aurora

2011-05-16 Thread Corey
On Monday, May 16, 2011 09:02:58 AM Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > NOTE: Cross-posted to three mailing lists, please keep it that way, if > you want to reply. > > Aurora is supposed to be something we call a "featurephone client" – > featurephones being those things we used for telephony before

Re: Aurora

2011-05-16 Thread Neil Jerram
On 16 May 2011 17:02, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > NOTE: Cross-posted to three mailing lists, please keep it that way, if > you want to reply. If you can persuade them all to accept emails from non-subscribed email addresses... (For weird historical reasons, I'm subscribed to different lists

Re: Aurora

2011-05-16 Thread Simon Busch
On 16.05.2011 23:22, Neil Jerram wrote: > I'm afraid I don't understand. Why not just have SHR as your > reference set of applications? If you don't think they are using the > FSO APIs in the pattern that you would recommend, presumably you could > work with them to correct that? Or, if they are