Magnus Persson wrote:
Quoting Jason House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Looking at a single color, the winning percentage seems to shift by
0.2 to 0.4%... About what I'd expect to see. What confuses me though
is how to interpret the jump back and forth as the color changes
(about 8%). Are the percen
Quoting Jason House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Looking at a single color, the winning percentage seems to shift by
0.2 to 0.4%... About what I'd expect to see. What confuses me though
is how to interpret the jump back and forth as the color changes
(about 8%). Are the percentages always the winnin
Magnus Persson wrote:
Quoting Jason House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Does anyone have any data on just how optimistic or pessimistic the
results
would be? I'd like to use some heuristics that inherit winning
percentages
from a parent node to bias the expected winning percentage of the
children
nod
Jason House wrote:
Darren Cook wrote:
Hi Jason,
In UCT the monte carlo searches (I find it clearer to call them "the
playouts") are always run to the end of the game. So they always
accurately (well, as accurate as a random playout can be!) take sente in
account. Therefore my understanding is th
Quoting Jason House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Does anyone have any data on just how optimistic or pessimistic the results
would be? I'd like to use some heuristics that inherit winning percentages
from a parent node to bias the expected winning percentage of the children
nodes... and maybe pruning a
> Let's take a basic example of a leaf node in an MC search tree that
> hasn't been expanded, but has 4 children. Let's say that random
> simulation through the children have winning percentages of {46%, 51%,
> 47%, 48%}. Assuming a uniform simulation policy, the winning percentage
> would be the
Darren Cook wrote:
Hi Jason,
In UCT the monte carlo searches (I find it clearer to call them "the
playouts") are always run to the end of the game. So they always
accurately (well, as accurate as a random playout can be!) take sente in
account. Therefore my understanding is that it does not matte
Hi Jason,
In UCT the monte carlo searches (I find it clearer to call them "the
playouts") are always run to the end of the game. So they always
accurately (well, as accurate as a random playout can be!) take sente in
account. Therefore my understanding is that it does not matter whether
they start
For simplicities sake, let's say I do a pure 0-ply and 1-ply monte carlo
search. If the color to move is my color, I'd expect the 0-ply search to
give me a more conservative winning percentage than the 1-ply search (since
I'd pick the best child rather than average the children together).
Similar
