Are we to assume that Size is starting to get good at 9x9 and can beat
Gnugo consistently?
- Don
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 13:14 +0100, Chrilly wrote:
For testing Suzie on 9x9 we (Peter Woitke and Chrilly) use Gnu-Go
Level
16.
Is there something stronger around /available?
Y
- Original Message -
From: alain Baeckeroot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: computer-go computer-go@computer-go.org
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [computer-go] Strongest 9x9 programm?
Having various opponents is the best way for improvement.
Yes, I fully agree.
I
Are we to assume that Size is starting to get good at 9x9 and can beat
Gnugo consistently?
- Don
Peter Woitke has done a great job in the last month. He deserves the Hero
of the Suzie work medal. Especially he fixed a lot of bugs. But on 19x19
its still not satisfactory, so Peter gave it a
On 1/1/07, Łukasz Lew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that MoGo is already stronger than 1d on KGS.
I'm 3d KGS and it's hard to win.
Mogo has almost no loses KGS.
Lukasz
I made a quick and dirty update to my old php-script to half-heartedly
support cgoban3 ( not the online script, it's
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Chrilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
For Suzie I try for 9x9 to establish a Dan-ranking at the next European
Championship in Villach/Austria.
Do you mean that you are planning to enter it for a regular human Go
event? Have you checked that the organisers will
Yes, where is Suzie?
Seriously, CGOS tries to be programmer friendly and will be improved
to be more so.
Unfortunately you will not always get a tough opponent, but
this is impossible with an open server. However CGOS tries
hard to keep the opponents paired up fairly closely and you will
For Suzie I try for 9x9 to establish a Dan-ranking at the next European
Championship in Villach/Austria.
Do you mean that you are planning to enter it for a regular human Go
event? Have you checked that the organisers will allow this?
I once entered Professor Chen's HandTalk for a human
Hi Chrilly,
I find it pretty amazing that even a little money will inspire people
to play a computer who wouldn't otherwise.
Many years ago my old chess programs were welcome at tournaments, but
as soon as players started losing, the program wore out it's welcome!
The change was like night and
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 19:06 +0100, Urban Hafner wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hej,
I figured I'd ask my question about CGOS here as the documentation is
said to be out of date. My question is: Does CGOS do the time
handling like KGS, i.e. send a time_left
Thanks. So it seems that doing as many random games as possible is not the
ideal approach.
In UCT, I suppose the equivalent of the principal variation would be the
path from the root that always visits the child with the highest number of
simulations. When you make a move with 70,000
I want to point out that this is not an attempt to be fair about
network lag - if you have a more reliable network your program
will always have an advantage.
What it tries to do is make it so that the time your bot spends
thinking as reckoned by your local clock is an upper bound on
the
An interesting report.
I have a question about a line near the end where you address the two
meanings of UCT:
UCT as applied to times stands for Universal Coordinate Time. It is
the same, for most practical purposes including ours, as GMT,
Greenwich Mean Time, the time zone based on
On 31-dec-06, at 15:34, David Fotland wrote:
A strong chinese player using chinese rules will pick up a point or
two
during the dame filling stage when playing a strong japanese
player. The
Chiense player will choose earlier moves that gain a later dame
point that
the japanese player
I seem to remember someone on this group a couple of years ago or so
saying that there won't be a 1 Dan 9x9 player anytime soon. I don't
remember the exact quote or who said it. I'm looking through the
archives but I can't find it. I would not name the person even when
I do, but it gives me
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 20:10 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious about the full width depth and the principal variation
depth to
compare UCT wilth alpha-beta.
The comparison is not so easy to do I think, because using MC as an
evaluation
function for alpha beta, you have to do
David Fotland wrote:
Most of the world plays be Japanese rules, so any commercial program
must implement Japanese rules.
I totally agree.
A strong chinese player using chinese rules will pick up a point or two
during the dame filling stage when playing a strong japanese player. The
Chiense
Hi Jacques,
I think Chinese should be universally adapted, but before you flame
me I'll tell you why.
I know of players who thought Go might be an interesting game, but
gave up quickly when they realized they could never play by Japanese
rules.
Even though they eventually could have learned
one early habit that is good for new go players to learn is
to always fill dame. sometimes groups get ataried this way
that the newer player wouldn't have noticed. it can result
in massive point loss if you're not careful about it, and it's
a good teaching tool (from the japanese rules point of
Let's not confuse japanese counting with Japanese rules. It is quite
feasible with Chinese rules and the use of pass stones to end up doing
territory counting over the board which is equivalent to area scoring,
On 1/1/07, steve uurtamo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
one early habit that is good for
19 matches
Mail list logo
