[computer-go] Correct Komi for 6x6 is 2.0

2008-10-01 Thread Ingo Althöfer
Magnus Persson wrote: Ingo Althofer wrote: But ... when White instead of passing continues wC2, the game should go on with bB2 wF1 bPass wF2, and now the score is B+2. Black ignores w C2 and plays F1. F1 by Black would be a huge blunder, because then White plays B1 and kills the black

Re: [computer-go] Correct Komi for 6x6 is 2.0

2008-10-01 Thread Magnus Persson
I fear we are not talking about the same game. In case I made a mistake in my email you get the sgf here: (;FF[4]CA[UTF-8]AP[GoGui:1.1]SZ[6] KM[2.5]DT[2008-09-30]RE[B+Resign] ;B[cc];W[dd];B[cd];W[dc];B[db];W[eb];B[de];W[ee];B[ed];W[ec]

[computer-go] Correct Komi for 6x6 is 2.0

2008-10-01 Thread Ingo Althöfer
Hello Magnus, there was indeed a notation error in your original posting. There you give 13.C1 (see last line below) and not 13.C2 as in the sgf. Ingo. I have been trying to see what Valkyria does. But it is a little unstable when it reads deep at 6x6. It should not be a problem for

[computer-go] Congratulations to David Fotland!

2008-10-01 Thread Ingo Althöfer
His program Many Faces of Go has become winner in the 9x9-Go competition in the 13th International Computer Games Championship, held in Beijing. Rank 2 for MoGo after tiebreak against Leela. http://www.grappa.univ-lille3.fr/icga/tournament.php?id=180 with table and sgf of many games. Today the

Re: [computer-go] Correct Komi for 6x6 is 2.0

2008-10-01 Thread Magnus Persson
Great! Mystery solved. Magnus Quoting Ingo Althöfer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello Magnus, there was indeed a notation error in your original posting. There you give 13.C1 (see last line below) and not 13.C2 as in the sgf. Ingo. I have been trying to see what Valkyria does. But it is a little

[computer-go] Computer-Go on small boards

2008-10-01 Thread Ingo Althöfer
Gian-Carlo Pascutto replied: Don Dailey wrote: 4. I believe Leela, at a higher level and with a correction book would play perfect or very close to perfect on 6x6. This may depend on seki issues however, it may not be possible for Leela (or other Go programs) to play

Re: [computer-go] Correct Komi for 6x6 is 2.0

2008-10-01 Thread ndkrempel
See comments below... ... bE3 wE4 bE1 wF3!!!... Normally wF2 is played in the corner. But with wF3 white has the option to play aggresively with wF1 which usually is a bad idea because the ko fight risk to much. But on a small board things are not normal... Can I ask which ruleset this is

Re: [computer-go] Correct Komi for 6x6 is 2.0

2008-10-01 Thread Michael Williams
Does anyone have any komi data for 4x5 or 5x6? I'm trying to reproduce these numbers using my own engine and 6x6 is still a bit large. ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Re: [computer-go] Correct Komi for 6x6 is 2.0

2008-10-01 Thread Don Dailey
Yes, and that harmonizes with my line too. - Don On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 09:31 +0200, Magnus Persson wrote: Great! Mystery solved. Magnus Quoting Ingo Althöfer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello Magnus, there was indeed a notation error in your original posting. There you give 13.C1 (see

RE: [computer-go] Congratulations to David Fotland!

2008-10-01 Thread David Fotland
Thanks. Mogo had already finished when Many Faces and Streenvreeter played our last game. I had to win it to win the tournament, and it was a very exciting game with a huge semeai. It was complex enough I have no idea which program made the final mistake. For quite some time I thought Many

Re: [computer-go] Correct Komi for 6x6 is 2.0

2008-10-01 Thread Magnus Persson
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: See comments below... ... bE3 wE4 bE1 wF3!!!... Normally wF2 is played in the corner. But with wF3 white has the option to play aggresively with wF1 which usually is a bad idea because the ko fight risk to much. But on a small board things are not normal... Can I

Re: [computer-go] Congratulations to David Fotland!

2008-10-01 Thread Ian Osgood
Congratulations! Both for the gold, and for defeating Mogo. I never thought I'd see the day that the Go tournaments would bring heavier hardware than the chess championship! I was surprised to hear that there were now only thirteen entrants. Why did Prof. Chen withdraw Go Intellect?

Re: [computer-go] Congratulations to David Fotland!

2008-10-01 Thread Darren Cook
Congratulations! Yes, well done David. I see Many Faces won even without getting the loss to Mogo reversed. I was surprised to hear that there were now only thirteen entrants. Why did Prof. Chen withdraw Go Intellect? I think he was having computer trouble and the loan computer would have

Re: [computer-go] Congratulations to David Fotland!

2008-10-01 Thread David Doshay
Hi David, Did you take those machines to China? Cheers, David On 1, Oct 2008, at 6:14 AM, David Fotland wrote: I was doing about 40 million playouts per move on 32 Xeon processors and he had eight cores. ___ computer-go mailing list

Re: [computer-go] 2008 World 9x9 Computer Go Championship in Taiwan

2008-10-01 Thread Olivier Teytaud
Dear all, the results of the 9x9 computer-go event in Taiwan (including a 9x9 competition and games between humans and computers) can be seen at http://go.nutn.edu.tw/eng/main_eng.htm (see news) These games were organized by the National University of Tainan and the Chang Jung Christian

Re: [computer-go] Congratulations to David Fotland!

2008-10-01 Thread terry mcintyre
I'm curious -- was this an 8 x quad-core box? Should be able to fit all those puppies into a single box nowadays. Terry McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] We must stop dressing up the slaughter of foreigners as a great national cause. -- Sheldon Richman - Original Message From: David