Re: [CGUYS] Grabbing domain names of well-known persons?

2007-10-08 Thread gerald
At 10:07 AM 10/8/2007, you wrote: On 10/7/07, Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also sort of assumed that .org meant a real nonprofit. Otherwise, various unscrupulous outfits and organizations might simply pose as being non-profits. Could have the equivalent of, say, Microsoft.org

Re: [CGUYS] Grabbing domain names of well-known persons?

2007-10-08 Thread Randy
Good question! Whatever the original rationale, what is the point currently in having all these fine distinctions, most of which are either meaningless or which apparently not many people grasp anyway? Guess it does create more potential business for folks like GoDaddy and their ilk since

Re: [CGUYS] Grabbing domain names of well-known persons?

2007-10-08 Thread Tom Piwowar
Tom, OTOH, I picture as Yosemite Sam, stomping on his hat, when someone is productive using a PC. I spend a lot of my time making PC users as productive as possible and less of a burden on their Mac-using brethren. * ==

Re: [CGUYS] Printing pains and computer-induced sleep disorder

2007-10-08 Thread Tom Piwowar
Well, the other side of this is that their prices seem significantly lower than others I've seen, so if this is accurate, for people like myself, without much money, it's very tempting to go the el cheapo way, which this apparently is. So if you or anyone else knows of better alternatives that

Re: [CGUYS] Power Off?

2007-10-08 Thread Tom Piwowar
I have asked why they do not configure those computers to go into 'sleep' mode after a certain time of non-use has elapsed, or why they do not arrange for the drives to stop running when not needed. or why they do not hit the off button of the monitors and printers at the end of the day. The

Re: [CGUYS] Grabbing domain names of well-known persons?

2007-10-08 Thread Vicky Staubly
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Tom Piwowar wrote: I guess this is why even Oprah herself has a site and magazine, etc., to complement her show. Oprah has them to make a lot of money. While Oprah does accomplish much that is good I expect that you could be mighty disillusioned to find out that she is a

Re: [CGUYS] Grabbing domain names of well-known persons?

2007-10-08 Thread Randy
Yes, that's what I meant - the various things she has complement each other synergistically, leading to both more money, more influence and more power. I think she is at a point where making money is not the overwhelming goal, that having influence to do things is, including, now, via political

Re: [CGUYS] Power Off?

2007-10-08 Thread Paul Meyer
Checkout One Laptop Per Child You have to climb the protocol stack. Checkout One Laptop Per Child project laptop.org - Original Message From: Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Sent: Monday, October 8, 2007 3:53:35 PM Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Power Off?

Re: [CGUYS] Grabbing domain names of well-known persons?

2007-10-08 Thread Paul Meyer
The scriptures say not that money is the root of evil but the love of money is. Checkout One Laptop Per Child project laptop.org - Original Message From: Vicky Staubly [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Sent: Monday, October 8, 2007 2:53:23 PM Subject: Re: [CGUYS]

[CGUYS] born_with_it.??? [was: Grabbing domain names of well-known persons?]

2007-10-08 Thread b_s-wilk
And while we are at it, why not this: Every legal citizen would ( at birth or whenever this would be implemented for everyone else) be automatically registered with one domain based on their legal name, with some unique identifier to distinguish identical names. This would be creepy. The

Re: [CGUYS] born_with_it.??? [was: Grabbing domain names of well-known persons?]

2007-10-08 Thread Vicky Staubly
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, b_s-wilk wrote: And while we are at it, why not this: Every legal citizen would ( at birth or whenever this would be implemented for everyone else) be automatically registered with one domain based on their legal name, with some unique identifier to distinguish identical

Re: [CGUYS] Power Off?

2007-10-08 Thread Tom Piwowar
Actually, this isn't *strictly* true. Unless there's a design flaw, downstream devices should simply wait and keep trying. My router's often on with my modem off (when I'm resetting the modem). You are right. A properly designed device should keep trying so the order in which they are turned on

Re: [CGUYS] born_with_it.??? [was: Grabbing domain names of well-known persons?]

2007-10-08 Thread Randy
there you go!so why not preserve one's name and some indentifier if necessary to distinguish them from anyone else with the same name, from being used by anyone else without their permission? Whether the person ever registers or uses it would be up to them. By the way, for those

[CGUYS] email header time stamps?

2007-10-08 Thread db
Does anyone know if the times listed in email headers can be spoofed? If the sender changes their clock date/ time then the sending date/ time is spoofed but it seems to be that the server transit point times list on full header could not be spoofed. Is that true or false... does anyone

[CGUYS] GoDaddy's registration agreement - speaking of privacy issues

2007-10-08 Thread Randy
Here is the portion of the GoDaddy registration agreement (for registering a domain name) that gave me pause when I went to register my first name. Does this mean what it appears to me to mean - that if you only have a residential address this will be put in a public directory and can even be

Re: [CGUYS] email header time stamps?

2007-10-08 Thread Matthew Taylor
Any part of the header can be spoofed with the right technique and access. That said, it is unlikely to be spoofed on your mail server's portion without that server having been compromised. When you see a wonky time stamp it is more likely that the server has its settings wrong wrt local

Re: [CGUYS] email header time stamps?

2007-10-08 Thread Tom Piwowar
Does anyone know if the times listed in email headers can be spoofed? Everything in an email header can be easily spoofed. * == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in == * == the body of an email