Yes, Tom, my mind corrected it for me as I read it, so I missed the
mistake. I agree. Who said those who give up their rights hoping for
security end up with neither? Our rights under our constitution are our
only real guarantee of security!
Thank you,
Mark Snyder
-Original Message-
Read the book about the Duke LaCrosse trio that I am listening to on
Public Radio would make the hairs on the back of your head stand up.
Stewart
At 06:40 AM 1/29/2008, you wrote:
I'm so glad this was corrected. This kind of mistakes bugs the hell
out of me. Recently noticed it once
On Jan 29, 2008, at 1:11 AM, Eric S. Sande wrote:
It's easy to suggest impropriety. I think the burden of proof
is yours, sir.
I offer this.
http://tinyurl.com/3xc5o5
* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the
No wonder people hate lawyers and the legal system.
To get us back on topic (sort of), this takes us back to an earlier
thread Time Warner pay based on Data Usage. The point in both cases is
greedy corporations starting propoganda campaigns to pollute our
understanding of reality. Time Warner
Mr Sande, your turn. Blinders are so very hard to
discard...
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
I'm so glad this was corrected. This kind of mistakes bugs the hell
out of me. Recently noticed it once again while watching Law and
Order. A loose qoute; Do you not agree that you slept with the
defendant!? Yes!
Ok, yes what? They either did or didn't.
Do I really need to
Jeff,
There are two arguments that mitigate against the Friedmann pov. One
using
1970 economics and one using 2007 economics.
While we're talking about Robin Hoods: There's another kind of
economics, too: 1929-1933 economics. Back then, in a laissez-faire
environment, bankers and other corporate
Jeff,
There are two arguments that mitigate against the Friedmann pov. One using
1970 economics and one using 2007 economics.
The morality of maximizing profits is based on the idea that markets
do certain things efficiently and so promoting the freedom of business people,
entrepreneurs and
Bandwidth shortage...yeah. Cox is testing 30mbit here in phoenix.
Friend of mine posted 28.7mbit test results via dslreports.
Mike
On Jan 29, 2008 9:51 AM, Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No wonder people hate lawyers and the legal system.
To get us back on topic (sort of), this takes
I offer this.
http://tinyurl.com/3xc5o5
Suggesting, if the numbers are accurate, that .0078 of the responses
for data were without court order or subpoena in advance, which is
the normal procedure.
Whether this was in response to a National Security Letter or not is
unspecified. What is
Suggesting, if the numbers are accurate, that .0078 of the responses
for data were without court order or subpoena in advance, which is
the normal procedure.
Are you not playing with statistics here? They admit to 720 illegal acts
during a period of 2-3/4 years. There are about 690 business days
Plus, at least some of these requests were very broad. Not just who did
this person call, but all the persons this person called and all the
people those people called. That's going to be a big number.
Well, not exactly. It was stated that the telco didn't keep calling
circle data. Also, the
I don't have the Sonnet Tempo ATA100 card in my G4, but I do have one
of their SATA cards, so my experience may have some relevance. I have
not had any problems with it whatsoever. My boot drive on that computer
is now the one connected to the SATA card and it has never had problems
recognizing
13 matches
Mail list logo
