Worth reading: NYT has a long analytical story about the App Store and
Apple's competitors...
App Store Is a Game Changer for Apple and Cellphone Industry
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/06/technology/06apps.html
Still, the App Store is markedly better than the alternative, says
Peter
And anyone...like me who has used a WM phone knows the load of bull that
part is. MS is behind, way, wayWAY behind the mobile game. Their
newest isn't any different than the last 4 years. The only thing saving MS
at this point is being deeply in the market and companies like HTC building
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:35 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
And anyone...like me who has used a WM phone knows the load of bull that
part is. MS is behind, way, wayWAY behind the mobile game. Their
newest isn't any different than the last 4 years. The only thing saving MS
at this
Depends on the front. HTC has put a lot of work into it's SenseUI, I use it
on the android phone I have and there is a version for windows phones. On
WM it only goes so deep, so eventually you end up back at WM and some of the
screens in that OS haven't been changed for years. Suddenly you are
Survey reveals the deep misery of Apple iPhone developers...
Android developers were making peanuts compared to Apple's iPhone
apps developers
68% of those surveyed are somewhat or not likely to put further work
into their apps
In other words, they may go where the big money is --
Another quote from the article which is as revealing:
Of course, 30 people is so small a sample as to be almost negligible --
there are thousands of Android developers who have built more than 15,000
apps -- but if the trend holds true acrosss the majority of apps makers,
it's very disturbing.
You are right. Course by that logic, Apple should close up it's OS X shop.
Do we even need to quote sales of OS X vs Windows? I'd wager since Apple
has a world wide marketshare of OS X at less then 5%, the difference is
staggering. Windows 7 with all your hate, has already overtaken OS X in
On Nov 28, 2009, at 8:35 PM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
It's currently a process that screws with everyone. The paid line
could
fund more people to approve everything.
So you think you can bribe Apple into making the Ten Commandments into
the Ten Suggestions? Slip them a fiver and they'll
You must think apple is really stupid.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:38 AM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Nov 28, 2009, at 8:35 PM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
It's currently a process that screws with everyone. The paid line could
fund more people to approve everything.
So you think you can
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:38 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Nov 28, 2009, at 8:35 PM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
It's currently a process that screws with everyone. The paid line could
fund more people to approve everything.
So you think you can bribe Apple into making the Ten
And why not abuse the programmers? Just because they don't have to, doesn't
mean they shouldn't. Just more of Apple being unethical. But MS is
unethical for paying for a service...rght.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:09 AM, John Duncan Yoyo johnduncany...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29,
On Nov 29, 2009, at 1:09 PM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
Apple made a mess of this process early on. They didn't make the
rules
clear early on and then keep spring secret criterea for failing
things.
Yes they did and they are struggling with the burden. Should they be
faulted for not being
Keep changing the subject Tom. Never answer the question. Pretend no one
notices you can dance with the best.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:57 AM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Nov 29, 2009, at 1:09 PM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
Apple made a mess of this process early on. They didn't make the
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:57 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Nov 29, 2009, at 1:09 PM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
Apple made a mess of this process early on. They didn't make the rules
clear early on and then keep spring secret criterea for failing things.
Yes they did and they are
Users should go read the site instead of depending on Tom's
characterization. By now we all know he has an agenda so things should be
seen before believed. Looking thru that list there aren't many at all that
have anything to do with length of time of the process, but Tom, once again
hijacked
http://apprejections.com/
A website that gathers and lists the reasons why apps are rejected from the
iPhone store. The rejection reasons are like reading a laundry list of bad
jokes.
*
** List info, subscription
On Nov 28, 2009, at 11:57 AM, mike wrote:
A website that gathers and lists the reasons why apps are rejected
from the
iPhone store. The rejection reasons are like reading a laundry list
of bad
jokes.
I bet you got that from Fox News too.
This is a help site for app developers to share
Sometimes the point isn't that the line is long, it's that Apple gives
developers tools to use, and the developer spends months using that tool and
gets rejected for using the tool.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:55 AM, John Duncan Yoyo johnduncany...@gmail.com
wrote:
Apple had a couple of the
On Nov 28, 2009, at 2:13 PM, mike wrote:
Sometimes the point isn't that the line is long, it's that Apple gives
developers tools to use, and the developer spends months using that
tool and
gets rejected for using the tool.
They also give developers a long list of silly rules, like do not
On Nov 28, 2009, at 1:55 PM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
Apple had a couple of the better developers throw in the towel last
week.
I guess what they need to do is have a paid application process like
the
pharmaceutical industry has now. Two lines a free line that moves
as fast
as it moves and
Who is 'you guys'. I think this email was from one guy. Again, your
reading skills need work. Try having someone in your office reading the
emails to you, it might help out.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:10 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Nov 28, 2009, at 1:55 PM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
Sorry I confuse you with silly things like the truth. You should actually
try READING the site I linked and you'd see why Apple rejects. Do you ever
tire of ignoring half the facts?
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:59 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Nov 28, 2009, at 2:13 PM, mike wrote:
On Nov 28, 2009, at 4:22 PM, mike wrote:
Sorry I confuse you with silly things like the truth. You should
actually
try READING the site I linked and you'd see why Apple rejects. Do
you ever
tire of ignoring half the facts?
Caught red handed, Mike retreats into fantasy land (once again).
It is possible to add to this discussion without your silliness. Anyone who
has read the site I posted knows the BS you are spinning around.
meh
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:02 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Nov 28, 2009, at 4:22 PM, mike wrote:
Sorry I confuse you with silly things like the
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:10 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Nov 28, 2009, at 1:55 PM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
Apple had a couple of the better developers throw in the towel last week.
I guess what they need to do is have a paid application process like the
pharmaceutical industry has now.
25 matches
Mail list logo
