On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:23 AM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
Haven't heard anything about attempts to return the phone before Giz bought
it..?
http://gizmodo.com/5520729/why-apple-couldnt-get-the-lost-iphone-back?skyline=trues=i
This whole thing is just stupid. I hope Apple isn't behind any of the
prosecution of this person, their employee, for loosing the phone. I also hope
they're not behind the prosecution of the person who sold it, or the person who
blogged what it's advancements where over their most
Reverend, please don't bad-mouth my Honda Fit!
On 4/27/10, Stewart Marshall revsamarsh...@earthlink.net wrote:
At least you can buy neat looking cars that perform also.
Makes it more fun to drive.
Stewart
*
** List
Whose bad mouthing it? Kind of a neat car.
Lots of European clones of it also.
Stewart
At 08:07 AM 4/28/2010, you wrote:
Reverend, please don't bad-mouth my Honda Fit!
On 4/27/10, Stewart Marshall revsamarsh...@earthlink.net wrote:
At least you can buy neat looking cars that perform also.
I am not talking about the screamers.
Even many of their low end cars are neat looking compared to what is
sold over here.
Stewart
At 12:00 AM 4/28/2010, you wrote:
I'll take a ford gt over those foreign screamers.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Stewart Marshall
This Giz article just makes me want to find someone who works at Gizmodo and
slap em around. This blog post front to back is an insult to their
readers. They make not one statement as fact, it's all maybe and perhaps.
They also gloss over the fact they knew who the phone belonged to...I don't
Too true you could stream quite a few car-b-ques on that fast network.
Haven't ever heard of 30,000 cars getting torched in LA or Miami or The
Bronx...
Mike
You probably weren't around when DC, Philly, Newark, Detroit, LA were
burning during the riots of the 60s and 70s.
But if you were,
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:11 AM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
This Giz article just makes me want to find someone who works at Gizmodo and
slap em around. This blog post front to back is an insult to their
readers. They make not one statement as fact, it's all maybe and perhaps.
They also
But only slightly less than the price of cheese in France is how much the
telco's charge in said country.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:46 AM, b_s-wilk b1sun...@yahoo.es wrote:
Too true you could stream quite a few car-b-ques on that fast network.
Haven't ever heard of 30,000 cars getting torched
Most I've heard have dismissed this believing exposing the new iphone this
early would kill current sales.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:51 AM, phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.comwrote:
I also think that Apple was also silly to let something
super-secretive be taken out in public. Unless,
On Apr 28, 2010, at 11:51 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
I also think that Apple was also silly to let something
super-secretive be taken out in public. Unless, of course, what
essentially transpired is what they wanted to have happen.
Releasing new products without field testing is not a
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:10 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
Most I've heard have dismissed this believing exposing the new iphone this
early would kill current sales.
Are you saying that folks do not already suppose that Apple is going
to release a new version of their ubiquitous phone in
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:54 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
Releasing new products without field testing is not a good idea. You are
taking quite an extreme stance if your efforts to oppose Apple. Perhaps you
should run for the Senate?
Field testing an as yet publicly unseen and unreleased
I'm saying most industry folks are saying that putting a new iphone into the
faces of those who may be buying one, may make them wait till this new one
comes out. Especially one that may look very different than the current
one.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:28 PM, phartz...@gmail.com
If I was a judge in this case my first query would be if this item is worth
so much, money, market share..etc...why did you send some kid into a bar to
leave it while he went out and took a leak in the alley? This super secret
phone from Apple wasn't taken from Apple headquarters by a team of IMF
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:53 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm saying most industry folks are saying that putting a new iphone into the
faces of those who may be buying one, may make them wait till this new one
comes out. Especially one that may look very different than the current
one.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Jeff Miles jmile...@charter.net wrote:
This whole thing is just stupid. I hope Apple isn't behind any of the
prosecution of this person, their employee, for loosing the phone. I also
hope they're not behind the prosecution of the person who sold it, or
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:56 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
If I was a judge in this case my first query would be if this item is worth
so much, money, market share..etc...why did you send some kid into a bar to
leave it while he went out and took a leak in the alley? This super secret
On Apr 28, 2010, at 3:25 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
However, it is my position that they brought this upon
themselves either through intent or through foolishness. In either
case, they should shoulder the blame themselves in this instance
instead of lashing out at others by causing the
Sounds like you read half of Jason Calacanis's breakdown where he said
everyone involved including Apple were d#$ks.
On Apr 28, 2010 4:43 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Apr 28, 2010, at 3:25 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote: However, it is
my position that they bro...
You bleeding-heart
On Apr 28, 2010, at 8:49 PM, mike wrote:
Sounds like you read half of Jason Calacanis's breakdown where he said
everyone involved including Apple were d#$ks.
I bet that if we were to come over to your house and help ourselves to
your belongings you would be singing a tune similar to Apple.
Lousy analogy Tom. You act as if you have not read any of what has
been written about this item.
The fact is the item was left by absent minded techie at bar.
Item was turned into bar tender who has no idea whose it is.(I
wonder how many folks had been there that night and had phones?)
s actually up and running on a working, plugged-in DOS machine. But
then, I'm a total pack rat.
I'm a pack rat too. I'll be holding on to my zip and floppy
drivesjust in case. They don't take up much space.
Paula Minor
raven880atindy.net
On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:54 PM, Stewart Marshall wrote:
You tend to be so predictable Tom.
I sure am. Those old tablets Moses was carrying still have some
meaning to me.
*
** List info, subscription management, list
You can personally feel that Apple was foolish in how they let the
phone be stolen, but that has absolutely no legal bearing on its
theft.
There are still people who are foolish enough to leave their car
running and unlocked when they go into a convenience store,
but if the car gets stolen,
You do realize noone buys it when you alter facts to suit your argument
right?
On Apr 28, 2010 6:40 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Apr 28, 2010, at 8:49 PM, mike wrote: Sounds like you read half of
Jason Calacanis's breakdow...
I bet that if we were to come over to your house and help
I did not know you were Jewish.
Stewart
At 09:16 PM 4/28/2010, you wrote:
On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:54 PM, Stewart Marshall wrote:
You tend to be so predictable Tom.
I sure am. Those old tablets Moses was carrying still have some
meaning to me.
I've seen nothing about any attempts to return the phone..any links rev?
On Apr 28, 2010 6:59 PM, Stewart Marshall revsamarsh...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Lousy analogy Tom. You act as if you have not read any of what has been
written about this item.
The fact is the item was left by absent minded
An HP engineered phone can't be worse than a palm pixi. Web os is a strong,
nicely done os...it just has no support for apps and the hardware I think is
poor.
On Apr 28, 2010 7:34 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
Wow! This is an interesting change of fortune and hopefully a new lease on
life for
It has been referenced here online that the phone got returned.
Stewart
At 10:27 PM 4/28/2010, you wrote:
I've seen nothing about any attempts to return the phone..any links rev?
On Apr 28, 2010 6:59 PM, Stewart Marshall revsamarsh...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Lousy analogy Tom. You act as if
So far I am very happy with my Palm Pre.
Nicely done, nice hardware and easy to use.
Could use a few more apps, it would be nice to have a decent IM program.
I have not paid for one app yet, an have a decent group of them that
are useful.
The free hotspot app and usage (Verizon dropped the
I mean attempts before illegalities ensued. Maybe before at least Denton got
Chen to do the iPhone autopsy.
On Apr 28, 2010 8:43 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall popoz...@earthlink.net
wrote:
It has been referenced here online that the phone got returned.
Stewart
At 10:27 PM 4/28/2010, you wrote:
On Apr 28, 2010, at 11:36 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
It has been referenced here online that the phone got returned.
Apple sent folks over to the guy's house to demand he give them back
the phone. He didn't.
Your account is pure fabrication.
Gizmodo's iPhone Saga: Fact vs.
On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:34 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
That is not a fair or accurate comparison.
It is fair and accurate.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy,
34 matches
Mail list logo
