Re: [CGUYS] New MS ads not so ineffective after all?

2009-06-10 Thread t.piwowar
On Jun 9, 2009, at 10:59 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote: I also have noted in those MS ads that the buyers are making their decisions solely predicated upon two factors: The cheaper cost and the advice of Best Buy salespersons. Would anyone on this list rely upon those two criteria when making

Re: [CGUYS] New MS ads not so ineffective after all?

2009-06-10 Thread mike
Where do you meet these people? On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:05 AM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote: On Jun 9, 2009, at 10:59 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote: I also have noted in those MS ads that the buyers are making their decisions solely predicated upon two factors: The cheaper cost and the

Re: [CGUYS] New MS ads not so ineffective after all?

2009-06-10 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:11 AM, mikexha...@gmail.com wrote: Where do you meet these people? I don't know where Tom meets these people, but I meet them all the time. However, my experiences with folks who are completely wedded to Windows seems to be different from what Tom is saying. The

Re: [CGUYS] New MS ads not so ineffective after all?

2009-06-10 Thread t.piwowar
This is called battered spouse syndrome. It needs intervention and possibly arrest of the guilty party. On Jun 10, 2009, at 1:07 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote: However, as much as they might complain about their balky machines, they think that they have no choice but to keep using Windows

Re: [CGUYS] New MS ads not so ineffective after all?

2009-06-10 Thread t.piwowar
I think they refer to you as target audience. On Jun 10, 2009, at 11:11 AM, mike wrote: Where do you meet these people? * ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a

Re: [CGUYS] New MS ads not so ineffective after all?

2009-06-10 Thread t.piwowar
Yes, savvy buyers will get Macs, but there is also a very large group of people who know little about computers. These are graphic artists. They typically point to their computer and call them the hard drive. (I have never been able to understand the consistency with which they use the

Re: [CGUYS] New MS ads not so ineffective after all?

2009-06-10 Thread Snyder, Mark - IdM (IS)
I too meet them, Steve. My company is large and has a large IT group. They install all of the patches and probably over 95+% of all software installs. Each OS installation is configured from a company-standard image. None of the managers and few of the technical staff are able to do anything

Re: [CGUYS] New MS ads not so ineffective after all?

2009-06-10 Thread Stephen Brownfield
Steve, I just wanted to say that I think your comments have been spot on! Steve B phartz...@gmail.com wrote: I'll probably get clobbered now, but hey, that's what I think. Yes, I know that many Windows users HAVE TO use Windows based machines because of work requirements, but

Re: [CGUYS] New MS ads not so ineffective after all?

2009-06-10 Thread Jeff Wright
I would not use a term like savvy to describe our WFBs. Their loyalties are more like to a political party. They never see anything wrong with anything M$ shoves out. All their software -- even Vista -- is double plus good. They love the Zune and those crummy WINCE phones. I was recently

Re: [CGUYS] New MS ads not so ineffective after all?

2009-06-10 Thread Jeff Wright
I'll probably get clobbered now, but hey, that's what I think. Yes, I know that many Windows users HAVE TO use Windows based machines because of work requirements, but those are not the individuals I am talking about here. The smug arrogance and asshattery displayed regularly by a

[CGUYS] New MS ads not so ineffective after all?

2009-06-09 Thread Chris Dunford
http://blogs.computerworld.com/microsoft_ad_campaign_cleans_apples_clock The odd thing is that the Ad Age article that ComputerWorld references appears to have disappeared. All the links to it, including the ones on Ad Age's own site, come up with item not found. Maybe it's just a web site error.

Re: [CGUYS] New MS ads not so ineffective after all?

2009-06-09 Thread t.piwowar
On Jun 9, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Chris Dunford wrote: http://blogs.computerworld.com/ microsoft_ad_campaign_cleans_apples_clock The odd thing is that the Ad Age article that ComputerWorld references appears to have disappeared. All the links to it, including the ones on Ad Age's own site, come

Re: [CGUYS] New MS ads not so ineffective after all?

2009-06-09 Thread Chris Dunford
The links are dead because this is no longer current content. You just love to make stuff up, don't you? It turns out that the Ad Age piece is still there (and very current), but you have to pay to read it. All you can see without payment is part of the first paragraph: NEW YORK (AdAge.com) --

Re: [CGUYS] New MS ads not so ineffective after all?

2009-06-09 Thread t.piwowar
On Jun 9, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Chris Dunford wrote: You just love to make stuff up, don't you? It turns out that the Ad Age piece is still there (and very current), but you have to pay to read it. All you can see without payment is part of the first paragraph: So, your statement about it

Re: [CGUYS] New MS ads not so ineffective after all?

2009-06-09 Thread t.piwowar
On Jun 9, 2009, at 7:28 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote: To the best of my knowledge, Apple computers have always been seen as pricey. Nothing ground breaking about that. I have been hearing complaints about the cost of Apple machines for years, and also know it to be a fact. How do I know?

Re: [CGUYS] New MS ads not so ineffective after all?

2009-06-09 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Chris Dunfordseed...@gmail.com wrote: Sure, but the point of the article was the rather startling turnaround in the perception of the MS and Apple brands in the 18-34 demo. Since late winter, Apple's rating has dropped from 70 to 12, and MS's has increased from

Re: [CGUYS] New MS ads not so ineffective after all?

2009-06-09 Thread Chris Dunford
Now, MS is ahead 46-12. So, what does all of that actually mean? All it means is that the advertising campaigns appear to have been effective, which is all that I said it meant. There was considerable talk here that MS's ads were no good, but it seems that they were. No big deal.

Re: [CGUYS] New MS ads not so ineffective after all?

2009-06-09 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Chris Dunfordseed...@gmail.com wrote: All it means is that the advertising campaigns appear to have been effective, which is all that I said it meant. There was considerable talk here that MS's ads were no good, but it seems that they were. No big deal. The