Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-30 Thread Mark Corrigan

On Sep 26, 2007, at 11:14 AM, Charles Ballinger wrote:


Any except the gov't hospital.


What government hospital are you talking about?  I take it that you  
are not  a veteran and no nothing about the VA.  The VA is the  
biggest hospital system in the world and provides very good care for  
the less money than any other hospital in the US.  The VA is not  
constrained by the latest medicaid/medicare bill that prevents bulk  
bidding for medicines. As a consequence the VA pays the least amount  
for medicine of any hospital in the US.  The VA is the most  
computerized and has the most advanced medical software of any  
hospital in the world.  The VA was using bar code scanners to scan  
patients and pass meds 10 years ago. This makes it virtually  
impossible to have a medication error.  Doctors do not hand write  
orders at the VA.  All orders have do be entered into a computer.   
Hand written orders are the number one reason for medication  
mistakes .  They kill some where in the neighborhood of 100,000  
people per year in the us. All hospital in this country have problems  
(including the VA), but please don't knock the best run hospital  
system in the country (which happens to be government run) to private  
hospitals. By the way the VA is not Walter Reed which is a army  
hospital for active duty soldiers.  And one of Walter Reed's biggest  
problem's came about because they privatized their janitorial staff  
with a subsidiary of Haliburton.


For profit and nonprofit are equal except if you're a high risk OB/ 
sick mother case and would prefer the mother be saved by  
sacrificing the baby should it come to that. In that case you'd  
want to avoid certain religious affiliated hospitals.


On Sep 26, 2007, at 11:05 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:

Given the choice of three hospitals and knowing only that one was  
run by
a government agency, one was run by a for-profit corporation, and  
one was

run by a religious-charitable organization, which would your choose?



** 
**
* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in   
==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
==

* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L  
YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: ComputerGuys-L- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** 
**
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/ 
maillist.xml

* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived
** 
**


Mark Corrigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-30 Thread Rob
...no nothing...?  I take it you mean KNOW nothing?  :)

On Sunday 30 September 2007 10:57, Mark Corrigan wrote:
 On Sep 26, 2007, at 11:14 AM, Charles Ballinger wrote:
  Any except the gov't hospital.

 What government hospital are you talking about?  I take it that you
 are not  a veteran and no nothing about the VA.  The VA is the
  ---
 biggest hospital system in the world and provides very good care for
 the less money than any other hospital in the US.  The VA is not
 constrained by the latest medicaid/medicare bill that prevents bulk
 bidding for medicines. As a consequence the VA pays the least amount
 for medicine of any hospital in the US.  The VA is the most
 computerized and has the most advanced medical software of any
 hospital in the world.  The VA was using bar code scanners to scan
 patients and pass meds 10 years ago. This makes it virtually
 impossible to have a medication error.  Doctors do not hand write
 orders at the VA.  All orders have do be entered into a computer.
 Hand written orders are the number one reason for medication
 mistakes .  They kill some where in the neighborhood of 100,000
 people per year in the us. All hospital in this country have problems
 (including the VA), but please don't knock the best run hospital
 system in the country (which happens to be government run) to private
 hospitals. By the way the VA is not Walter Reed which is a army
 hospital for active duty soldiers.  And one of Walter Reed's biggest
 problem's came about because they privatized their janitorial staff
 with a subsidiary of Haliburton.

  For profit and nonprofit are equal except if you're a high risk OB/
  sick mother case and would prefer the mother be saved by
  sacrificing the baby should it come to that. In that case you'd
  want to avoid certain religious affiliated hospitals.
 
  On Sep 26, 2007, at 11:05 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
  Given the choice of three hospitals and knowing only that one was
  run by
  a government agency, one was run by a for-profit corporation, and
  one was
  run by a religious-charitable organization, which would your choose?
 
  **
  **
  * == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in
  ==
  * == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ==
  * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
  * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
  * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
  * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L
  YourNewAddress
  * Need more help? Send mail to: ComputerGuys-L-
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  **
  **
  * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
  * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
  maillist.xml
  * Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived
  **
  **

 Mark Corrigan
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





 
 * == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
 * == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
 * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
 * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
 * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
 * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
 * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
 * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
 * Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived
 



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-30 Thread Charles Ballinger
You took wrong Mark. I'm a veteran and I know the VA system.  Am I to  
guess you're somehow affiliated with the VA and took exception?


I didn't say one couldn't get good care at a VA. I said, given a  
choice I'd prefer a non-gov't run hospital, except depending on  
diagnosis. Lots of people seek out care for testicular cancer at  
Indiana University (Lance Armstrong is a famous one), but they don't  
go there because its IU. They go to IU because thats where they find  
Larry Einhorn.


The points you mentioned below all relate to efficiency. I answered  
Tom's question based on my perception of quality of care. A state-run  
med school affiliated hospital or practice would not be my first  
choice for routine care. Students need practice and learning  
opportunities, but I'm under no obligation to provide it personally.


Its not relevant that any given VA facility, or the VA on whole while  
may or may not be the best run hospital system in the country. That  
the residents managing pt care are supported with barcoded systems,  
EMRs, and an efficiently purchased formulary is also not relevant to  
my care decisions. I don't want a resident front-lining my care  
(especially at the beginning of the year) no matter how efficient the  
system is said to be.


Interestingly, all that most advanced medical software is a current  
topic of discussion in the churning swirl of medical education. A  
growing percentage of students is being found unable to compose a  
patient summary without using the system. Is medical education  
training techs to follow drop-down lists and history forms? Granted,  
care directed using a validated system strictly followed will  
probably reduce malpractice risk. It will also help make appt's  
quicker so more pts can be seen in a day to help make up for lower  
reimbursements. But, the argument goes, is that what we want from a  
physician?  I seem to think more and more we do, at least until we  
get what we're asking for.  I just hope the developers have the  
newest CASE tools and use some of that artificial intelligence and  
fuzzy logic to build the systems.


cb




On Sep 30, 2007, at 10:57 AM, Mark Corrigan wrote:


On Sep 26, 2007, at 11:14 AM, Charles Ballinger wrote:


Any except the gov't hospital.


What government hospital are you talking about?  I take it that you  
are not  a veteran and no nothing about the VA.  The VA is the  
biggest hospital system in the world and provides very good care  
for the less money than any other hospital in the US.  The VA is  
not constrained by the latest medicaid/medicare bill that prevents  
bulk bidding for medicines. As a consequence the VA pays the least  
amount for medicine of any hospital in the US.  The VA is the most  
computerized and has the most advanced medical software of any  
hospital in the world.  The VA was using bar code scanners to scan  
patients and pass meds 10 years ago. This makes it virtually  
impossible to have a medication error.  Doctors do not hand write  
orders at the VA.  All orders have do be entered into a computer.   
Hand written orders are the number one reason for medication  
mistakes .  They kill some where in the neighborhood of 100,000  
people per year in the us. All hospital in this country have  
problems (including the VA), but please don't knock the best run  
hospital system in the country (which happens to be government run)  
to private hospitals. By the way the VA is not Walter Reed which is  
a army hospital for active duty soldiers.  And one of Walter Reed's  
biggest problem's came about because they privatized their  
janitorial staff with a subsidiary of Haliburton.


For profit and nonprofit are equal except if you're a high risk OB/ 
sick mother case and would prefer the mother be saved by  
sacrificing the baby should it come to that. In that case you'd  
want to avoid certain religious affiliated hospitals.


On Sep 26, 2007, at 11:05 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:

Given the choice of three hospitals and knowing only that one was  
run by
a government agency, one was run by a for-profit corporation, and  
one was

run by a religious-charitable organization, which would your choose?



* 
***
* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands  
in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to:  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==

* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L  
YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: ComputerGuys-L- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* 
***
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/ 
maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header 

[CGUYS] Best apples (was Re: [CGUYS] Fw: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-29 Thread Mike Sloane
If you ever had a Cortland apple from upper NY state, you would know 
which is the best. :-)


Mike

John Duncan Yoyo wrote:

No the vote on apple split three ways.  Fuji, Granny Smith and
Gravenstein with a few outliers for Winter Banana,  Macoun and
McIntosh

On 9/26/07, mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Or maybe the last guy with a question regarding apple stuff was refused an
answer so everyone gave up.

Mike

On 9/26/07, Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I think too many list members have switched to OS X. Now they don't have
any computer problems to gripe about. The rest of you need to get to work
-- install Vista or some other harebrained piece of software so we can
ponder the consequences.




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Best apples (was Re: [CGUYS] Fw: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-29 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
The grapples are not bread to taste like a grape, but are soaked in a 
Concord grape solution to achieve the grape flavor.


Stewart


At 01:23 PM 9/27/2007, you wrote:
On the Splendid Table table episode last week they talked to 
an  apple breeding botantist.  He said they 
released  a  variety  that  tastes like cherries when fully ripe.


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace
Ozark, AL  SL 82



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Fw: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-27 Thread Constance Warner
Winter Banana?  Really?  Where can you get them?

I can buy Grimes Golden, Black Twig, York, Winesap, etc. from Heyser
Farms, but they've never had Winter Banana.  Do you have a source?

--Constance

P.S.: My husband works at an Apple retailer.  I can ask him about some
specialized technical Mac questions that are difficult to answer
otherwise, and relay the answers to the list.

No the vote on apple split three ways.  Fuji, Granny Smith and
Gravenstein with a few outliers for Winter Banana,  Macoun and
McIntosh

On 9/26/07, mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Or maybe the last guy with a question regarding apple stuff was
refused an
 answer so everyone gave up.

 Mike

 On 9/26/07, Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I think too many list members have switched to OS X. Now they don't
have
  any computer problems to gripe about. The rest of you need to get to
work
  -- install Vista or some other harebrained piece of software so we
can
  ponder the consequences.
 
 
 

  * == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in
==
  * == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
  * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
  * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L
DIGEST
  * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
  * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L
YourNewAddress
  * Need more help? Send mail to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

  * List archive at
www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
  * RSS at
www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
  * Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be
archived
 

 




 * == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in
==
 * == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
 * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
 * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
 * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
 * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L
YourNewAddress
 * Need more help? Send mail to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 * List archive at
www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
 * RSS at
www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
 * Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived





-- 
John Duncan Yoyo
---o)



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L
YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at
www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Best apples (was Re: [CGUYS] Fw: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-27 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
I bought an apple called a Grapple that smelled and tasted very grape
like last year.  It came in a plastic box of four and smelled
wonderful.  I saw it at Wegmans and either Giant or Safeway.

On 9/27/07, Paul Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On the Splendid Table table episode last week they talked to an  apple
 breeding botantist.  He said they released  a  variety  that  tastes like
 cherries when fully ripe.

 - Original Message 
 From: b_s-wilk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
 Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 12:04:25 PM
 Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Best apples (was Re: [CGUYS] Fw: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING

  
   If you ever had a Cortland apple from upper NY state, you would know
 which is the best. :-)

 Northern Spy--not only perfect for my yummy apple pies--it has the best
 name.

 Gotta go back to canning my apples now...


 Betty


 
 * == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
 * == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
 * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
 * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
 * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
 * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
 * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
 * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
 * Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived
 







 
 * == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
 * == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
 * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
 * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
 * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
 * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
 * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
 * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
 * Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived
 



-- 
John Duncan Yoyo
---o)



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-26 Thread Tom Piwowar
 A happy employee is worth a ton of money!  They help recruit business.  I 
 know this as it is the same or similar model Churches use to grow.

The idea that the government should respond to social problems was a 
product of the Reformation, part of the process of sidelining the church. 
Then the neo-cons decided that big business was a better substitute for 
big religion. Events have amply demonstrated that business is not suited 
to the task.

Given the choice of three hospitals and knowing only that one was run by 
a government agency, one was run by a for-profit corporation, and one was 
run by a religious-charitable organization, which would your choose?



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-26 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

The one my doctor prefers to associate with.

What is sometimes overlooked is that Doctor preference can also be an 
indicator of what are the better hospitals.


If you have a family physician and he only chooses to associate with 
one particular hospital there must be a reason.


Other than that I would usually prefer the religious associated hospital.

Oh do not blame the reformation for the disassociating of the church 
from social service.  It simply advocated the separation of Church 
and government.  (Do you really want the Pope appointing governmental leaders?)


The movement toward governmental oversight of social problems and 
welfare was a growth of government in the late 1800's.


Many church movements spawned by the reformation dedicated themselves 
toward social improvement and involvement including John Wesley 
(Methodism.)  The reformation has been blamed for a lot of our social 
ills, but we only have ourselves to blame.


Resettlement of Refugees after WW2?  Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services.

Orphanages?  Catholic Church in the US, Anglican church in Canada.

Schools?  Largest parochial school systems in US, (Also oldest) 
Catholics and Lutherans.


The government in the guise of trying to protect us has taken over 
many of these programs by increasing regulation that forces out 
private and parochial institutions.


It is not just Neo-Cons that propose this.  It is also those who 
crave wealth.  Many of the current crop of Democrats would not have 
the wealth they do without Big Business and its benefits.


Stewart

At 10:05 AM 9/26/2007, you wrote:

The idea that the government should respond to social problems was a
product of the Reformation, part of the process of sidelining the church.
Then the neo-cons decided that big business was a better substitute for
big religion. Events have amply demonstrated that business is not suited
to the task.

Given the choice of three hospitals and knowing only that one was run by
a government agency, one was run by a for-profit corporation, and one was
run by a religious-charitable organization, which would your choose?


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace
Ozark, AL  SL 82



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-26 Thread Matthew Taylor
Sometimes hospitals also restrict how many doctors they will allow  
privileges as well.  Some very  good family practice doctors have no  
privileges at all, as most anything going on in a hospital involves a  
specialist.



On Sep 26, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:

What is sometimes overlooked is that Doctor preference can also be  
an indicator of what are the better hospitals.


If you have a family physician and he only chooses to associate  
with one particular hospital there must be a reason.




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-26 Thread Charles Ballinger

Adding to Matthew's comments:

The established trend is to use hospitalists.  Your doc gets some  
feedback, etc on your progress, but your inpatient care is directed  
and managed by the hospital's W-2 employed hospitalist. I'd not call  
a hospitalist a specialist other than as defined contractually.


Another reason your doc may only have privileges at one hospital,  
besides being an employee of that hospital, is that its often  
required that the majority of your admissions (51%?) must go to the  
hospital offering you admissions privileges (remember the hospitalist  
will take over care for your pt upon admission). A large hospital  
system owned by a 'religious-charitable organization does this.. so  
its not a profit/nonprofit split.  We left Kansas some time ago.



On Sep 26, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Matthew Taylor wrote:

Sometimes hospitals also restrict how many doctors they will allow  
privileges as well.  Some very  good family practice doctors have  
no privileges at all, as most anything going on in a hospital  
involves a specialist.



On Sep 26, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:

What is sometimes overlooked is that Doctor preference can also be  
an indicator of what are the better hospitals.


If you have a family physician and he only chooses to associate  
with one particular hospital there must be a reason.






* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-26 Thread Constance Warner
You should also be aware that Catholic hospitals will not provide
emergency contraception in case of rape, or--for that matter--any
contraception at all.

Provision of contraception in areas where few providers are available
continues to be a problem, and not just in the case of Catholic
hospitals.  For example, some pharmacists refuse, on religious grounds,
to fill prescriptions for birth control pills, and some state laws
support their refusal.  This is definitely a problem if you're a woman
in a small rural town and the next-closest drug store is 100 miles away.

--Constance

Any except the gov't hospital.

For profit and nonprofit are equal except if you're a high risk OB/ 
sick mother case and would prefer the mother be saved by sacrificing  
the baby should it come to that. In that case you'd want to avoid  
certain religious affiliated hospitals.

On Sep 26, 2007, at 11:05 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:

 Given the choice of three hospitals and knowing only that one was  
 run by
 a government agency, one was run by a for-profit corporation, and  
 one was
 run by a religious-charitable organization, which would your choose?



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Fw: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-26 Thread Tom Piwowar
I think too many list members have switched to OS X. Now they don't have 
any computer problems to gripe about. The rest of you need to get to work 
-- install Vista or some other harebrained piece of software so we can 
ponder the consequences.



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] OT WARNING!!!! - Tom is right

2007-09-26 Thread Charles Ballinger

On Sep 26, 2007, at 3:18 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
I think too many list members have switched to OS X. Now they don't  
have
any computer problems to gripe about. The rest of you need to get  
to work
-- install Vista or some other harebrained piece of software so we  
can 
ponder the consequences.



Tom is correct by my experience.

I was deep into developing apps on OS/2 for years. Unix before that.  
When IBM quieted OS/2 a friend suggested I follow the world and  
install NT4. I did and computer work immediately ceased being a focus  
in my life. Email was about it for a long time.


Sometime in mid 2000, with much angst, I bought my first Mac.. the  
redesigned white dual-USB iBook, a 500 MHz G3 that is still going  
strong. I bought it for the new OSX knowing it had *nix in there  
somewhere. I'd long ago lost most of my *nix skills but was looking  
forward to having a 'real' OS again. Also knowing several mac users  
who always seemed quite content helped me take the leap even though I  
was warned by several Windows people that I'd never be able to  
exchange a file with them again and was paying more only to be  
constantly plagued by pox.


Moving ahead seven years... I'm working from our household's third  
Mac, a MacBook Pro, and I haven't looked back nor missed a thing  
(except for a nifty grocery list app I liked back when: www.tali.com/ 
slm/)


Interesting things have also happened while drinking Apple's KoolAid.  
When I sit down and open my computer my focus is on my work. To me,  
my computer 'disappears'. I don't know if this is a unique  
experience, but I remember that futzing with computer things was a  
big part of my work. Not that it wasn't enjoyable at the time, but  
now I enjoy futz directly with my work. Put another way, my work gets  
most of the mind-share now. The biggest bonus is that I much prefer  
what I do now over the computer focused stuff I did before.


Other things came up when my computer, or the OS etc, left the  
forefront.  This isn't all Mac exclusive or dependent I think. But  
for me, it did. And I'm glad.


... back to 'work'.

Charles



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-26 Thread Robert

Tom Piwowar wrote:
Given the choice of three hospitals and knowing only that one was run by 
a government agency, one was run by a for-profit corporation, and one was 
run by a religious-charitable organization, which would your choose?



  
Depends on the government agency.  If it is a hospital run by the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency or the Dept. of Homeland Security, I 
would choose either a religious or a for-profit hospital.  If it is a 
teaching hospital run by a state university, I would choose the 
government agency.




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-26 Thread Randy
What would be a real-world example of a government-run hospital, aside from 
the VA, maybe Childrens or NIH?  Can't think of any in D.C. area, Boston 
area, Baltimore or otherwise, unless memory is failing me, which could 
always be the case.


Randall


- Original Message - 
From: Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING



A happy employee is worth a ton of money!  They help recruit business.  I
know this as it is the same or similar model Churches use to grow.


The idea that the government should respond to social problems was a
product of the Reformation, part of the process of sidelining the church.
Then the neo-cons decided that big business was a better substitute for
big religion. Events have amply demonstrated that business is not suited
to the task.

Given the choice of three hospitals and knowing only that one was run by
a government agency, one was run by a for-profit corporation, and one was
run by a religious-charitable organization, which would your choose?



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.30/1030 - Release Date: 
9/25/2007 8:02 AM






* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-26 Thread Charles Ballinger
Teaching hospitals are fine.. especially if you're stuck with some  
'zebra' of a problem.  Although every July and August, given a  
choice, I'd lean toward the non-teaching, non-govt places.





On Sep 26, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Robert wrote:


Tom Piwowar wrote:
Given the choice of three hospitals and knowing only that one was  
run by a government agency, one was run by a for-profit  
corporation, and one was run by a religious-charitable  
organization, which would your choose?




Depends on the government agency.  If it is a hospital run by the  
Federal Emergency Management Agency or the Dept. of Homeland  
Security, I would choose either a religious or a for-profit  
hospital.  If it is a teaching hospital run by a state university,  
I would choose the government agency.



** 
**
* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in   
==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
==

* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L  
YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: ComputerGuys-L- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** 
**
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/ 
maillist.xml

* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived
** 
**




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-26 Thread Randy
Supposedly the VA hospitals have improved greatly over their rather dismal 
past; however still hear tales of woe from a few vets who use the one in 
D.C., not to mention the various stories that broke last year about some VA 
or other vet facilities.


Randall

- Original Message - 
From: Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING



Tom Piwowar wrote:
Given the choice of three hospitals and knowing only that one was run by 
a government agency, one was run by a for-profit corporation, and one was 
run by a religious-charitable organization, which would your choose?




Depends on the government agency.  If it is a hospital run by the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency or the Dept. of Homeland Security, I would 
choose either a religious or a for-profit hospital.  If it is a teaching 
hospital run by a state university, I would choose the government agency.




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 
269.13.30/1030 - Release Date: 9/25/2007 8:02 AM







* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Fw: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-26 Thread mike
Or maybe the last guy with a question regarding apple stuff was refused an
answer so everyone gave up.

Mike

On 9/26/07, Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think too many list members have switched to OS X. Now they don't have
 any computer problems to gripe about. The rest of you need to get to work
 -- install Vista or some other harebrained piece of software so we can
 ponder the consequences.


 
 * == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
 * == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
 * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
 * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
 * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
 * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
 * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
 * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
 * Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived
 




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Fw: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-26 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
No the vote on apple split three ways.  Fuji, Granny Smith and
Gravenstein with a few outliers for Winter Banana,  Macoun and
McIntosh

On 9/26/07, mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Or maybe the last guy with a question regarding apple stuff was refused an
 answer so everyone gave up.

 Mike

 On 9/26/07, Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I think too many list members have switched to OS X. Now they don't have
  any computer problems to gripe about. The rest of you need to get to work
  -- install Vista or some other harebrained piece of software so we can
  ponder the consequences.
 
 
  
  * == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
  * == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
  * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
  * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
  * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
  * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
  * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
  * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
  * Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived
  
 


 
 * == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
 * == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
 * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
 * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
 * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
 * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
 * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
 * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
 * Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived
 



-- 
John Duncan Yoyo
---o)



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Fw: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-26 Thread mike
Silly me I voted for gala.

Mike

On 9/26/07, John Duncan Yoyo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 No the vote on apple split three ways.  Fuji, Granny Smith and
 Gravenstein with a few outliers for Winter Banana,  Macoun and
 McIntosh

 On 9/26/07, mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Or maybe the last guy with a question regarding apple stuff was refused
 an
  answer so everyone gave up.
 
  Mike
 
  On 9/26/07, Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   I think too many list members have switched to OS X. Now they don't
 have
   any computer problems to gripe about. The rest of you need to get to
 work
   -- install Vista or some other harebrained piece of software so we can
   ponder the consequences.
  
  
  
 
   * == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands
 in  ==
   * == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]==
   * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
   * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
   * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
   * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L
 YourNewAddress
   * Need more help? Send mail to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
   * List archive at
 www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
   * RSS at
 www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
   * Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived
  
 
  
 
 
  
  * == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
  * == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
  * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
  * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
  * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
  * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L
 YourNewAddress
  * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
  * RSS at
 www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
  * Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived
  
 


 --
 John Duncan Yoyo
 ---o)


 
 * == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
 * == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
 * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
 * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
 * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
 * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
 * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
 * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
 * Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived
 




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Fw: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-26 Thread Randy
Imagine if they had gone with Gravenstein.  So, how do you like your new 
Gravenstein?  Would undoubtedly have been shortened to something like Grave, 
as in nice Grave you've got there!


Randall

- Original Message - 
From: John Duncan Yoyo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@listserv.aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Fw: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING



No the vote on apple split three ways.  Fuji, Granny Smith and
Gravenstein with a few outliers for Winter Banana,  Macoun and
McIntosh

On 9/26/07, mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or maybe the last guy with a question regarding apple stuff was refused 
an

answer so everyone gave up.

Mike

On 9/26/07, Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think too many list members have switched to OS X. Now they don't 
 have
 any computer problems to gripe about. The rest of you need to get to 
 work

 -- install Vista or some other harebrained piece of software so we can
 ponder the consequences.


 
 * == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
 * == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
 * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
 * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
 * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
 * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L 
 YourNewAddress

 * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
 * RSS at 
 www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml

 * Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived
 




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L 
YourNewAddress

* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at 
www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml

* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived





--
John Duncan Yoyo
---o)



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.30/1030 - Release Date: 
9/25/2007 8:02 AM






* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Fw: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-25 Thread Matthew Taylor
Like him, hate him, think him a loon or a wise man, but Ron Paul is  
definitely not cut from the same cloth as the other candidates for  
President.


On Sep 24, 2007, at 3:46 PM, Randy wrote:


Someone for real, fundamental change wouldn't run for President




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



[CGUYS] Bingo! - you hit on the fundamental problem of humanity, and its implied solution (was Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!)

2007-09-25 Thread Randy
 of the question.  And in terms of that source 
of power, what is the real difference between computers and human beings?

BTW,  if anyone might possibly be interested, the above analysis comes from a 
theory I've recently developed:  Why Things Are As They Are.and how they 
could be otherwise.  This, in turn, rests, in part, on a slightly earlier 
theory:  Theory of Thinking, which, in turn is basically an elaboration of the 
implications of a theory about the roles and relationship between Questions and 
Answers - with all of this being various elaborations on one simple insight 
into one simple idea or concept; that of The Question and the asking of 
questions in search of answers.  

Randall

- Original Message - 
From: b_s-wilk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 7:21 PM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING


 Constance Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
 
 It's not just health care.
 
 As I see it, the underlying question is: do we, as citizens, want a
 system in which the highest ethical value is making more money, down to
 the last penny, no matter what else is lost in the process?  Especially
 when some of the players who are doing the down to the last penny
 strategy already have vast resources and don't have to act like
 turn-of-the-century coal barons in order to survive and prosper.  Quite
 apart from aesthetics (like, would you rather have a downtown in your
 small town or deserted storefronts and a Wal-Mart on the edge of town),
 there are real drawbacks for everyone in the down to the last penny
 strategy... 
 
 
 Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is for everybody, more or 
 less. Can't do that if lots of people are sick. The rich are better off, 
 too, when everybody is healthy. Trouble is that too many people--rich, 
 middle class and poor--are too shortsighted/greedy/ignorant to figure 
 that out. Thus they don't plan ahead and consider future 
 consequences--truly penny-wise and pound-foolish. Google posted Robert 
 Greenwald's video, Walmart - High Cost of Low Price, 
 http://snipurl.com/1r6tc. It's a free download.
 
 Is there a video featuring a better-run company like Costco--not 
 including  'Idiocracy' or 'Employee of the Month' [although Mike Judge's 
 Idiocracy was funny]? There are plenty of companies that have management 
 with consciences, just not Walmart--one of the most expensive places to 
 shop.
 
 
 
 * == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
 * == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
 * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
 * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
 * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
 * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
 * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
 * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
 * Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived
 
 
 
 -- 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
 Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.30/1025 - Release Date: 9/23/2007 
 1:53 PM




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-25 Thread Randy
Only recently have I begun to appreciate or even watch or pay attention to 
religious figures as sources of great insight and wisdom; particularly these 
mega preachers.  Saw TJ Jakes (may have his initials wrong) on a few shows, 
Dr. Phil yesterday, most recently.  Also, recent shows of Joel Osteen 
(Sundays, on Fox), which I just stumbled on by accident.  And other things, 
in various religions, that are simply deeply profound wisdom.  Just tonight, 
I did the introductory class for a course I've devised on mental health 
recovery, and mentioned some of these very inspirational messages and 
messengers, and that if we continue to have this course, I would like and 
plan to bring in videos or books of some of these people or even live 
presenters (though probably not these folks :)).  I can see why people are 
so drawn to these meg-preachers, and its not just because they are offering 
false hopes or dreams, a la some of the more notorious tv preachers in the 
past, like Jim and Tammy, etc.  I think people are drawn to people like 
Osteen because they sense that is saying something that is true, even 
profound, and potentially of profound significance for their lives.


The irony is that I am as much of a nonbeliever as one can be,  and can 
probably out Hitchens or out Dawkins some of my critical analysis of 
religion and how it functions in the world.  But I am only recently coming 
to see that there is a deeper, purely secular wisdom that these religions 
and religious figures (including Jesus, and I'm a non-believing Jew) say and 
said, even many millenia ago, that is still incredibly relevant as can be to 
our present situation.


Now, since I had a secular epiphany some 8 months ago, I finally realize 
that amazing learning, insight and wisdom is to be found all around us and 
that anything or anyone can be a great teacher, starting, first and 
foremost, with young children, who are the most creative, most imaginative 
persons on the planet and the best questioners.   And the questions, 
imagination and creativity are not all unrelated, either!


Randall


- Original Message - 
From: Rev. Stewart Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING



On that I see no disagreement.

A happy employee is worth a ton of money!  They help recruit business.  I 
know this as it is the same or similar model Churches use to grow.


Happy members pull other newer members in though the door thereby 
increasing numbers.


How to keep them happy plus make your profit is the key to growing a good 
business.


Stewart


At 09:29 PM 9/24/2007, you wrote:

About a year ago NPR interviewed the president of Costco and I was very
impressed with his sense of responsibility. He insisted that by providing
better conditions he could attract better employees and reduce turnover.
He said that the incresed productivity would pay for the better
conditions. He was specificially critical of the WalMart methods.


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace
Ozark, AL  SL 82



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 
269.13.30/1025 - Release Date: 9/23/2007 1:53 PM







* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Fw: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-25 Thread Randy
I don't know that much about him, though he seems intriguing, from what the 
little I have heard.  I am certainly troubled by the way the process 
essentially shuts someone like him out from real contention in many ways; a 
point made, ironically, by the Iranian president on Charlie Rose last night. 
That is, out a country of 300 million, even 4 years out, the number of 
American citizens with any realistic chance of becoming the next president 
was probably well under 100 (counting those with the interest, desire, name 
recognition, financial resources, minimal qualifications, etc.)  By 2 years 
out, this number was down to maybe 20, max.  By now, it's down to, what, 
maybe 2 or 2 in each party - maybe 5 persons with any real chance?


But again, all of this is OUR fault; for acquiescing to the existing system 
and state of affairs, and for so long.  And I would include in this the 
failure to question institutions like the Presidency over the last 231 
years, since we declared independence.  The institution, which Bush has 
given us the great gift of helping show, if we'd only see this, is an 
obsolete anachronism in a modern world; one which confers infinitely more 
power and consequentiality onto any modern occupant (not just Bush) than the 
King of England we claimed to have revolted against because we didn't want 
to live under such a powerful personage.  That we accept all of this and 
don't even think to question, that we can question any of this, is 
reflection of our disempowerment and our distorted perception that the 
people who gave us this government were not only the smartest people of 
their time, but were effectively deities or messagers of deities or a 
religion or other absolute truth; such that the system they gave us 230 plus 
years ago would also be the best possible system for all time, no matter how 
much things change.


If Paul is really for change then he should probably try to run as an 
independent, perhaps in coalition with one or some others; maybe even 
establish a new movement or even party.  If I were him, I would go directly 
to the people, over the heads of the mainstream media and political 
structure.  But if he is holding himself out (or being taken) as yet another 
Messiah, another white knight, then that is a pseudo answer.  The real 
answer is for a leader to, as Bill Bradley says, reflect back on the people, 
to show and inspire them and us to empower ourselves to bring about real 
change, including making whatever changes are needed.  Always looking for 
this or that white knight who we desperately hope has the answers we can't 
come  up with ourselves; hoping they will make better all that the past 
white knight-now-turned-Demon-Bush-Cheney ended up making such a mess of.


The answer isn't to find one white knight to clean up the mess of another, 
fallen one.  The real answer is for us to stop relying on white nights, 
experts, gurus, religions, ideologies, parties, political leaders, religious 
leaders, teachers, etc. and start realizing that we have the capacity to 
come up with our own answers, and start doing so.


Randall

- Original Message - 
From: Matthew Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Fw: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING


Like him, hate him, think him a loon or a wise man, but Ron Paul is 
definitely not cut from the same cloth as the other candidates for 
President.


On Sep 24, 2007, at 3:46 PM, Randy wrote:


Someone for real, fundamental change wouldn't run for President




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 
269.13.30/1025 - Release Date: 9/23/2007 1:53 PM







* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe

Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-24 Thread Constance Warner
It's not just health care.

As I see it, the underlying question is: do we, as citizens, want a
system in which the highest ethical value is making more money, down to
the last penny, no matter what else is lost in the process?  Especially
when some of the players who are doing the down to the last penny
strategy already have vast resources and don't have to act like
turn-of-the-century coal barons in order to survive and prosper.  Quite
apart from aesthetics (like, would you rather have a downtown in your
small town or deserted storefronts and a Wal-Mart on the edge of town),
there are real drawbacks for everyone in the down to the last penny
strategy.  For example, if you're a big-box store that doesn't pay its
employees enough for medical care, doesn't include any medical insurance
in the pay package, and doesn't allow employees to stay home when they
are sick (all common practices), you're a major incubator site if
someone walks into the store with pandemic flu, active drug-resistant
TB, or bird flu (mutated for human-to-human transmission).  In such a
case, do you really think that the flu or the TB will stop at the end of
the Wal-Mart parking lot?  Especially if the local public health
infrastructure is starved for funds because Wal-Mart and other major
property owners have not been paying taxes.

I might add in passing that, in most of human history, the ownership of
large amounts of property--especially real estate--usually goes with
large obligations.  If Wal-Mart were in classical Greece, for example,
they would be expected to pay for producing Euripides' latest play at
the festival of Dionysus and buy a ship for the navy.  This wasn't
written law, but the penalties in loss of community prestige and
influence--if they didn't pony up--were extreme.  And the owners would
be legally required to furnish horses, armor, and swords, and to be in
the front lines if their city-state was at war with anybody.

I wonder what would happen if Wal-Mart's major shareholders and
corporate officers had to perform the equivalent functions today.  They
might have to underwrite part of Sundance film festival; build ships for
the U.S. Navy; and personally go to Iraq as tank commanders in tanks
they bought themselves (since, of course, a mounted, armored knight was
the ancient and medieval equivalent of a tank).

I'll bet if you gave the major shareholders of WalMart (and similar
companies) the choice between going to Iraq and driving a tank and
building (for example) nuclear submarines, in the classical Greek
pattern--and paying taxes, slightly higher wages, and minimal medical
insurance--they would unhesitatingly choose the latter.

--Constance Warner



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-24 Thread Alvin Auerbach

Constance,

Just addressing your one point below:

If you recall, our Supreme Court ruled that a State could use its 
power of eminent domain to wrest real property from a citizen, then 
give that real property to a corporation, if in so doing, they would 
get more tax revenue from the corporation than from the rightful 
owner of the real property.


So your question has already been answered in the affirmative by the 
highest court in the land. This is another proof, and an extremely 
important one, that our government is gradually being changed from a 
Republic (note that we never did have a Democracy) into a Fascist 
State.



SNIP

As I see it, the underlying question is: do we, as citizens, want a
system in which the highest ethical value is making more money, down to
the last penny, no matter what else is lost in the process?

SNIP



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-24 Thread Constance Warner
I don't quite see what the Supreme Court decision about eminent domain
has to do with what WalMart does.
WalMart often comes into a community, in spite of the community's
protests, and does whatever Wal-Mart management wants: build stores,
abandon stores, demand tax concessions, wreck downtowns.  And don't get
me started on the depredations of private developers around here; for
example, we're losing the best architecture book store in town, to a New
York developer who boasts of being a special patron of architects.
That's only one case among many I could cite.  The tide is not to public
uses of assets; it's all one-way, into the hands of the highest bidders
in the private sector.  So far as I know, the Supreme Court decision had
no part in any of these transactions.  The private developers, and the
big box stores, have more than enough power to do whatever they want.

As to the Supreme Court decision on eminent domain: some local
governments have already passed revised eminent domain laws that will
make the Supreme Court decision moot.  It's quite a popular issue to get
elected on, and a lot of politicians are taking full advantage of it to
make political hay.  More power to them, in my opinion: that particular
Supreme Court decision is on its way to that great law office in the
sky, in part because of revised local laws, and in part because the
Supreme Court actually does pay some attention to public opinion, when a
decision like that causes a firestorm of projects.

I have my doubts about the current administration, in part because it
gives too much weight, and too many favors, to large property holders
like Wal-Mart.

--Constance


If you recall, our Supreme Court ruled that a State could use its 
power of eminent domain to wrest real property from a citizen, then 
give that real property to a corporation, if in so doing, they would 
get more tax revenue from the corporation than from the rightful 
owner of the real property.

So your question has already been answered in the affirmative by the 
highest court in the land. This is another proof, and an extremely 
important one, that our government is gradually being changed from a 
Republic (note that we never did have a Democracy) into a Fascist 
State.


SNIP
As I see it, the underlying question is: do we, as citizens, want a
system in which the highest ethical value is making more money, down to
the last penny, no matter what else is lost in the process?
SNIP



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L
YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at
www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-24 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

First off.

Anyone who tries to compete against Walmart head to head is an idiot.

Walmart is the largest grocer in town, but I still shop two smaller 
local stores because 1.)  They carry things Walmart does not.  2.)  I 
like their meat selections and quality better!


I do not buy everything at Walmart simply because they do not carry 
everything and I can beat them at other stores on items.  They are 
not a be all to end all.


Also note.  Check out how much cash, I.E. Grants the local stores 
hand out each year!!!  You will be surprised.  They hand out a lot of 
cash to different causes and activities and they tend not to 
discriminate about it either!  In our community we can always trust 
Walmart to allow us to solicit in front of their store.  Can't be 
said about all.


When I lived in Wisconsin, there was a local medical outfit owned and 
run by the doctors (Minimum pay for the Doctors was over $200,00 per 
year 7 years ago.)  This was a lot larger in income than the Walmart 
store.  They were tax exempt due to state law.  They started buying 
Doctors clinics throughout the northern part of the state and when 
they bought them, they immediately became tax exempt! Each community 
w0ould have a meeting with the local clinic and arrange a payment to 
take the place of taxes due on the property (Wisconsins Property 
Taxes are quite heavty.)  One year the city did not like the amount 
that was proposed by the local clinic (The main one which generated 8 
figures of income a year.)  So when it came time for some roads to be 
redone around the clinic the city declared it had no money and those 
improvements would have to be put on the back burner.  The clinic 
reopened their talks and a newer higher amount was made to the city 
in lieu of property taxes.


By the way not very Walmart in every location is not paying 
taxes.  In many locations they pay their fair share of property 
taxes.  Only in cases where they negotiated to locate a Walmart and 
get an abatement of Taxes are they exempt and many of those are for a 
limited time only.  After so many years they must pay taxes and pay 
them based on their current value not the original value.


Stewart


At 11:27 AM 9/24/2007, you wrote:

It's not just health care.

As I see it, the underlying question is: do we, as citizens, want a
system in which the highest ethical value is making more money, down to
the last penny, no matter what else is lost in the process?  Especially
when some of the players who are doing the down to the last penny
strategy already have vast resources and don't have to act like
turn-of-the-century coal barons in order to survive and prosper.  Quite
apart from aesthetics (like, would you rather have a downtown in your
small town or deserted storefronts and a Wal-Mart on the edge of town),
there are real drawbacks for everyone in the down to the last penny
strategy.  For example, if you're a big-box store that doesn't pay its
employees enough for medical care, doesn't include any medical insurance
in the pay package, and doesn't allow employees to stay home when they
are sick (all common practices), you're a major incubator site if
someone walks into the store with pandemic flu, active drug-resistant
TB, or bird flu (mutated for human-to-human transmission).  In such a
case, do you really think that the flu or the TB will stop at the end of
the Wal-Mart parking lot?  Especially if the local public health
infrastructure is starved for funds because Wal-Mart and other major
property owners have not been paying taxes.

I might add in passing that, in most of human history, the ownership of
large amounts of property--especially real estate--usually goes with
large obligations.  If Wal-Mart were in classical Greece, for example,
they would be expected to pay for producing Euripides' latest play at
the festival of Dionysus and buy a ship for the navy.  This wasn't
written law, but the penalties in loss of community prestige and
influence--if they didn't pony up--were extreme.  And the owners would
be legally required to furnish horses, armor, and swords, and to be in
the front lines if their city-state was at war with anybody.

I wonder what would happen if Wal-Mart's major shareholders and
corporate officers had to perform the equivalent functions today.  They
might have to underwrite part of Sundance film festival; build ships for
the U.S. Navy; and personally go to Iraq as tank commanders in tanks
they bought themselves (since, of course, a mounted, armored knight was
the ancient and medieval equivalent of a tank).

I'll bet if you gave the major shareholders of WalMart (and similar
companies) the choice between going to Iraq and driving a tank and
building (for example) nuclear submarines, in the classical Greek
pattern--and paying taxes, slightly higher wages, and minimal medical
insurance--they would unhesitatingly choose the latter.

--Constance Warner



* 

Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-24 Thread b_s-wilk

Constance Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:


It's not just health care.

As I see it, the underlying question is: do we, as citizens, want a
system in which the highest ethical value is making more money, down to
the last penny, no matter what else is lost in the process?  Especially
when some of the players who are doing the down to the last penny
strategy already have vast resources and don't have to act like
turn-of-the-century coal barons in order to survive and prosper.  Quite
apart from aesthetics (like, would you rather have a downtown in your
small town or deserted storefronts and a Wal-Mart on the edge of town),
there are real drawbacks for everyone in the down to the last penny
strategy... 



Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is for everybody, more or 
less. Can't do that if lots of people are sick. The rich are better off, 
too, when everybody is healthy. Trouble is that too many people--rich, 
middle class and poor--are too shortsighted/greedy/ignorant to figure 
that out. Thus they don't plan ahead and consider future 
consequences--truly penny-wise and pound-foolish. Google posted Robert 
Greenwald's video, Walmart - High Cost of Low Price, 
http://snipurl.com/1r6tc. It's a free download.


Is there a video featuring a better-run company like Costco--not 
including  'Idiocracy' or 'Employee of the Month' [although Mike Judge's 
Idiocracy was funny]? There are plenty of companies that have management 
with consciences, just not Walmart--one of the most expensive places to 
shop.




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-24 Thread Tom Piwowar
Is there a video featuring a better-run company like Costco--not 
including  'Idiocracy' or 'Employee of the Month' [although Mike Judge's 
Idiocracy was funny]? There are plenty of companies that have management 
with consciences, just not Walmart--one of the most expensive places to 
shop.

About a year ago NPR interviewed the president of Costco and I was very 
impressed with his sense of responsibility. He insisted that by providing 
better conditions he could attract better employees and reduce turnover. 
He said that the incresed productivity would pay for the better 
conditions. He was specificially critical of the WalMart methods.



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-24 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

On that I see no disagreement.

A happy employee is worth a ton of money!  They help recruit 
business.  I know this as it is the same or similar model Churches use to grow.


Happy members pull other newer members in though the door thereby 
increasing numbers.


How to keep them happy plus make your profit is the key to growing a 
good business.


Stewart


At 09:29 PM 9/24/2007, you wrote:

About a year ago NPR interviewed the president of Costco and I was very
impressed with his sense of responsibility. He insisted that by providing
better conditions he could attract better employees and reduce turnover.
He said that the incresed productivity would pay for the better
conditions. He was specificially critical of the WalMart methods.


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace
Ozark, AL  SL 82



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-23 Thread Charles Ballinger
What I can't get past is that we, or society is gov't. The federal  
gov't was built only very specific powers.  What it wasn't given  
remained with the states.. more specifically the people.  It's still  
up to us. So again, what I don't understand is why we seem to want  
out of our obligations (defined as societal/moral/ etc). Why are we  
always looking to the state beyond its mandate?


We have a very capable, and flexible nonprofit sector constantly  
experimenting with these issues and more.  Gov't loves the NPS as it  
provides a reliable proving ground.  As gov't crowds out the NPS in  
more arenas, while our civil society will never go away, I worry it  
will become smaller or less vibrant similar to those in the rest of  
the world.


cb



On Sep 23, 2007, at 2:51 PM, Randy wrote:

I believe you are correct; hence the logical (and moral)  
inconsistency of those (mostly liberals and Democrats) who  
simultaneously demand that WalMart and maybe other employers  
provide more health coverage while also seeking universal health  
care, usually through the federal government.  Meanwhile, somewhat  
ironically, Republican Governors in California and Massachusetts  
have helped move their states towards providing universal health  
care.  The rationale for employer-based health coverage no longer  
exists, as the circumstances which gave rise to this many decades  
ago have changed dramatically.


If people believe there is an ethical obligation to provide health  
care coverage for all who want and need it (as I do; at least for  
legal citizens) than this obligation should fall naturally on  
society, and therefore on society's main instrument of exercising  
its explicit obligations - government; not on employers.  That is,  
we should assume this obligation and the costs of doing so, not,  
as we are wont to do, pass it off onto others, such as large  
employers.


Personally, the model that makes the most sense to me of those I  
heard about is a single payer system; but I would add a lot of  
significant sticks and carrots to incentivize behavior likely to  
lead to good health and thus lower costs, while disincentivizing  
behavior likely to do the opposite.


I would extend this to the radical notion that people who are not  
able, at least at the moment, to provide for their children should  
be discouraged - as an ethical matter - from having children they  
cannot support, and therefore are likely to look to government to  
assume, in effect, this parental responsibility.  Of course, no  
mainstream politician or public figure would ever dare raise the  
ethics of having an unlimited right to reproduce irrespective of  
the consequences of exercising that right, but the issue is both  
logically and morally linked to the argument that society or  
someone has an obligation to provide for health care coverage for  
all persons, particularly those who cannot afford or access it on  
their own.


What does this have to do with computers?  Nothing, directly, but  
since others are discussing this here, this is my 2 cents.


Randall


- Original Message - From: Matthew Taylor  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING


I can see an argument that society has an obligation to provide   
health care to all, and that government is the best means to  
achieve  that.  I do not see that the obligation, if extant,  
should in any way  fall on employers.


If one accepted that argument, that an economic entity that  
employs a person obligated to provide healthcare to that person,  
then every mom  and pop enterprise, every individual who ever  
hired a kid to mow the  lawn, would logically and ethically share  
the obligation, for the  size of the employer does not bear upon  
the obligation, only its  practicality.


That is not Scrooge refusing to give to charity, for charity by  
its definition is voluntary, not obligatory.


Matthew

On Sep 20, 2007, at 3:18 PM, Constance Warner wrote:


Does Walmart have some inherent obligation to pay healthcare?  There
Might be a business case to do so...but that does not translate   
into an

obligation.

COMMENT:

`Are there no prisons?'' asked Scrooge.



* 
***
* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands  
in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to:  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==

* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L  
YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: ComputerGuys-L- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* 
***
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
* RSS at www.mail

Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-21 Thread gerald
I have owned small businesses for the past 40 years.  I retired in Jan 2007.  I 
provided health insurance for employees.

Certainly for the past 10 years, I provided a compensation package that took 
the cost of health insurance into consideration.  I had very low turnover as 
health insurance for low wage ($7-11/hr) employees who can only work 30 hrs a 
week is not easy to find.

the cost of a family was $500 in 2000, and $1000 in 
2006thats per month!!! 



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-20 Thread Matthew Taylor

On Sep 13, 2007, at 10:47 PM, b_s-wilk wrote:


OT WARNING!!

-Walmart makes deals with communities not to pay local taxes in return
for bringing jobs to the area.


As do many, many other business considering locating in a community.   
This is
a problem with local / state governments willing to offer tax  
incentives in an
attempt to beggar their neighbor - any business that left such on the  
table
when they know it is available would be violating their fiduciary  
duty to their

shareholders.



-Walmart underpays employees, sometimes making them work without pay,
and employees often need gov't assistance, i.e. food stamps,  
subsidized

housing. That is paid by local taxpayers, not Walmart.


If employees are made to work off the clock (as I have read from  
credible
sources has happened in some stores in violation of company policy)  
that is
a criminal or civil offense (depending on the jurisdiction iirc).   
That some of

its employees are otherwise in need of government assistance puts those
employees squarely in the mainstream of american society - we have  
structured
our society such that a significant minority, if not a majority, have  
become dependent

on government for day to day needs.


-Walmart either doesn't pay health benefits, or pays so little that
employees have to pay the difference themselves, which they can't  
afford
on Walmart wages, or get Medicaid, paid by local taxpayers, not  
Walmart.


Does Walmart have some inherent obligation to pay healthcare?  There  
might
be a business case to do so (which is why Kaiser started that ball  
rolling during
WWII when they could not raise wages due to government regulations)  
but that

does not translate into an obligation.

I can also attest from personal family experience that Walmart is a  
very attractive
place to work compensation package wise if you have made a long term  
commitment

to the company.  If you are more transient it is much less so.



-Walmart avoids paying taxes by renting from themselves,

Clever of them.  Again, this is the fault of tax laws that allow it,  
not Walmart
for doing what the law allows and their fiduciary duty basically  
requires them

to take advantage of.


The Walton family is worth around $85 Billion. Sam Walton's daughter,
Alice Walton, is in the forefront of lobbying to repeal the estate  
tax,

spending $millions to avoid paying $billions. When they don't pay,
ordinary taxpayers make up the difference, especially with the  
national

debt at almost $9 trillion.


Again you appear to assume that YOU, and other taxpayers, have an  
inherent right to the

Walton inheritance.  Why?



And they sell lousy computers...and the store stinks--literally.


Yes, for the most part, and yes, occasionally.  So do many other stores.
Most clean up or fade away.

Matthew



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-20 Thread Constance Warner
This is an old story--see the comment below this summary of the original
debate, if you like.

On Sep 13, 2007, at 10:47 PM, b_s-wilk wrote:

 OT WARNING!!

 -Walmart makes deals with communities not to pay local taxes in return
 for bringing jobs to the area.

This is a problem with local / state governments willing to offer tax  
incentives in an attempt to beggar their neighbor - any business that
left such on the table when they know it is available would be violating
their fiduciary duty to their shareholders.


 -Walmart underpays employees, sometimes making them work without pay,
 and employees often need gov't assistance, i.e. food stamps,
subsidized
 housing. That is paid by local taxpayers, not Walmart.

If employees are made to work off the clock...that is a criminal or
civil offense...That some of its employees are otherwise in need of
government assistance puts those employees squarely in the mainstream of
american society - we have structured our society such that a
significant minority, if not a majority, have become dependent on
government for day to day needs.

 -Walmart either doesn't pay health benefits, or pays so little that
 employees have to pay the difference themselves, which they can't
afford
 on Walmart wages, or get Medicaid, paid by local taxpayers, not
Walmart.

Does Walmart have some inherent obligation to pay healthcare?  There  
Might be a business case to do so...but that does not translate into an
obligation.

COMMENT:

`Are there no prisons?'' asked Scrooge.

``Plenty of prisons,'' said the gentleman, laying down the pen again.

``And the Union workhouses?'' demanded Scrooge. ``Are they still in
operation?''

``They are. Still,'' returned the gentleman, `` I wish I could say they
were not.''

``The Treadmill and the Poor Law are in full vigour, then?'' said
Scrooge.

``Both very busy, sir.''

``Oh! I was afraid, from what you said at first, that something had
occurred to stop them in their useful course,'' said Scrooge. ``I'm very
glad to hear it.''

``Under the impression that they scarcely furnish Christian cheer of
mind or body to the multitude,'' returned the gentleman, ``a few of us
are endeavouring to raise a fund to buy the Poor some meat and drink,
and means of warmth. We choose this time, because it is a time, of all
others, when Want is keenly felt, and Abundance rejoices. What shall I
put you down for?''

``Nothing!'' Scrooge replied.

``You wish to be anonymous?''

``I wish to be left alone,'' said Scrooge. ``Since you ask me what I
wish, gentlemen, that is my answer. I don't make merry myself at
Christmas and I can't afford to make idle people merry. I help to
support the establishments I have mentioned: they cost enough: and those
who are badly off must go there.''

``Many can't go there; and many would rather die.''

``If they would rather die,'' said Scrooge, ``they had better do it, and
decrease the surplus population. Besides -- excuse me -- I don't know
that.''

``But you might know it,'' observed the gentleman.

``It's not my business,'' Scrooge returned. ``It's enough for a man to
understand his own business, and not to interfere with other people's.
Mine occupies me constantly. Good afternoon, gentlemen!''

***



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] [ OT WARNING!!!!

2007-09-20 Thread Matthew Taylor
I can see an argument that society has an obligation to provide  
health care to all, and that government is the best means to achieve  
that.  I do not see that the obligation, if extant, should in any way  
fall on employers.


If one accepted that argument, that an economic entity that employs a  
person obligated to provide healthcare to that person, then every mom  
and pop enterprise, every individual who ever hired a kid to mow the  
lawn, would logically and ethically share the obligation, for the  
size of the employer does not bear upon the obligation, only its  
practicality.


That is not Scrooge refusing to give to charity, for charity by its  
definition is voluntary, not obligatory.


Matthew

On Sep 20, 2007, at 3:18 PM, Constance Warner wrote:


Does Walmart have some inherent obligation to pay healthcare?  There
Might be a business case to do so...but that does not translate  
into an

obligation.

COMMENT:

`Are there no prisons?'' asked Scrooge.




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived