On Mar 18, 2010, at 10:43 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
Tom, Ms. Cyrus was speaking to her pubescent fans, most of whom
spend far too much time socializing and whiling away their time on
their various computers, which includes cell phones, and not enough
time on what they need to be focused on.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:05 AM, tjpa wrote:
> I repeat, some of you folks have a real problem dealing with change. You are
> ignoring that many new technologies that greatly simplify and/or enrich our
> lives. I want more of these things, not less. I do agree that one has to
> pick and choose, b
stay away from the internet as much as is
possible and most certainly do not anchor your lifestyle to it
I repeat, some of you folks have a real problem dealing with change. You are
ignoring that many new technologies that greatly simplify and/ or enrich our
lives. I want more of these
At 9:05 AM -0400 3/18/10, tjpa wrote:
On Mar 18, 2010, at 8:01 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
stay away from the internet as much as is
possible and most certainly do not anchor your lifestyle to it
I repeat, some of you folks have a real problem dealing with change.
You are ignoring that ma
On Mar 18, 2010, at 8:01 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
stay away from the internet as much as is
possible and most certainly do not anchor your lifestyle to it
I repeat, some of you folks have a real problem dealing with change.
You are ignoring that many new technologies that greatly simpli
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:06 AM, b_s-wilk wrote:
> It's better to compute in relative isolation--and have a life.
I am no fan of Miley Cyrus by any means, but I did gain a bit of
respect for her as a result of the recent admonition she delivered to
her many pubescent fans... stay away from th
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:59 PM, CITY BOY wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2010, at 6:33 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Quite possibly. What, may I ask, is the difference between the life
>> of a product as opposed to the useful life of a product?
>
> The internet has made it a lot shorter. Today
Thanks helps a lot.
Stewart
At 10:14 PM 3/17/2010, you wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall
wrote:
> I have noticed that Mac owners refer to their Mac's by certain names,
> Lombards, Wallstreet, G3, G4, etc.
>
> Is there someplace where a neophyte can look these evo
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall
wrote:
> I have noticed that Mac owners refer to their Mac's by certain names,
> Lombards, Wallstreet, G3, G4, etc.
>
> Is there someplace where a neophyte can look these evolutions up?
Look here, Stewart:
http://www.everymac.com/
Ugly is in the eye of the beholder.
Answer me this question.
I have noticed that Mac owners refer to their Mac's by certain names,
Lombards, Wallstreet, G3, G4, etc.
Is there someplace where a neophyte can look these evolutions up?
Stewart
At 09:23 PM 3/17/2010, you wrote:
I had one of th
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:04 PM, tjpa wrote:
> The good for you. The only other down side I can think of is that ugly color
> of the case.
True enough. I keep it mounted down low. Really can't even see it.
Use a MS mouse with it and really like the way the G3 handles
scrolling, even more s
I had one of those...once again Tom and I agree...damn ugly.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:04 PM, tjpa wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:29 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I believe that you have made an assumption that is incorrect. I use
>> the G3 I have mentioned pretty much only to have Freeha
On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:29 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe that you have made an assumption that is incorrect. I use
the G3 I have mentioned pretty much only to have Freehand available
and to interface with my plotter/cutter.
The good for you. The only other down side I can think of is
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:59 PM, tjpa wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2010, at 6:33 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Quite possibly. What, may I ask, is the difference between the life
>> of a product as opposed to the useful life of a product?
>
> The internet has made it a lot shorter. Today it is har
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:58 PM, tjpa wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2010, at 7:51 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> My G3 Mac desktop still runs great, and most importantly to me, it
>> runs Freehand, an application that I just cannot really do without
>> unless I want to spend a lot of money. Obsolete
On Mar 17, 2010, at 7:51 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
My G3 Mac desktop still runs great, and most importantly to me, it
runs Freehand, an application that I just cannot really do without
unless I want to spend a lot of money. Obsolete? Definitely.
Useful? Absolutely. I think? I think I sh
On Mar 16, 2010, at 6:33 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
Quite possibly. What, may I ask, is the difference between the life
of a product as opposed to the useful life of a product?
The internet has made it a lot shorter. Today it is hard to compute in
isolation.
**
I remember guiding people over the phone on how to replace CMOS
batteries almost 2 decades ago.
Not for the faint hearted. System had to be running or you lost you settings.
Stewart
At 07:54 PM 3/15/2010, you wrote:
Someone decided that most computer users are not smart enough to
replace b
No you just do a lot of thinking, commendable.
Especially on this list.
Stewart
At 06:53 AM 3/17/2010, you wrote:
Oops. An extra "I think" in there.
Steve
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, arc
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:51 AM, phartz...@gmail.com
wrote:
> My G3 Mac desktop still runs great, and most importantly to me, it
> runs Freehand, an application that I just cannot really do without
> unless I want to spend a lot of money. Obsolete? Definitely.
> Useful? Absolutely. I think?
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:48 AM, b_s-wilk wrote:
> My Mac SE [1987] still works. It runs PageMaker 2, maybe FreeHand,
> Illustrator, MacDraw, MacWrite, a few games; has a 20 MB HD, 4 MB RAM. Still
> works, not useful. My mobile phone is smarter. All 6 of our old Macs work,
> but none earlier th
> This is a non-issue. These batteries typically last longer that the useful
> life of the product.
Quite possibly. What, may I ask, is the difference between the life
of a product as opposed to the useful life of a product?
Steve
My Mac SE [1987] still works. It runs PageMaker 2, maybe
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:44 PM, tjpa wrote:
> This is a non-issue. These batteries typically last longer that the useful
> life of the product.
Quite possibly. What, may I ask, is the difference between the life
of a product as opposed to the useful life of a product?
Steve
***
This is a non-issue. These batteries typically last longer that the
useful life of the product. Apple typically picks up the cost for
premature failures. This smarter design is also a very fair tradeoff
for a slimmer, simpler device with a longer battery charge. That is a
daily benefit. The
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
wrote:
> Nice to see that Apple continues to find ways to make their users pay even
> after the sale.
Someone decided that most computer users are not smart enough to
replace batteries. They may be right!
Steve
***
Nice to see that Apple continues to find ways to make their users pay even
after the sale.
http://my.earthlink.net/article/tec?guid=20100315/fe567e8a-1614-40e5-856b-d2892e0a69db
---
This message was sent by popoz...@earthlink.net via http://addthis.com. Please
note that AddThis does not verify
26 matches
Mail list logo
