On 17.03.2015 13:02, Sven Schwedas wrote:
Cf.
http://blog.viraptor.info/post/your-wifi-shows-me-where-you-live-work-and-travel
How does connman handle this? There don't seem to be
configuration options for it.
ConnMan will actively scan any previously connected network(s) (or
networks
Patrik,
Is there a simple way to update a service with the passphrase we receive as a
parameter ?
Regards,
Ram
-Original Message-
From: connman [mailto:connman-boun...@connman.net] On Behalf Of Patrik Flykt
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 2:23 PM
To: connman@connman.net
Subject: Re:
Yes I knew about the settings under the respective service.
We basically want to handle dynamic update of the passphrase, instead of
updating in the settings file.
Is Agent mandate ?
Regards,
Ram
-Original Message-
From: connman [mailto:connman-boun...@connman.net] On Behalf Of
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 04:25 +, Kallumari Nagaraja Rao, RammohanX
wrote:
Is it possible to implement in a way to pass passphrase as a string
via a C parameter activate ? Without having to request any input
from the user ?
Of course. It's all up to your C program how it wants to handle the
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 07:40 +, Kallumari Nagaraja Rao, RammohanX
wrote:
We basically want to handle dynamic update of the passphrase, instead
of updating in the settings file.
Is Agent mandate ?
Yes.
Patrik
___
connman mailing list
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 08:54 +, Kallumari Nagaraja Rao, RammohanX
wrote:
Is there a simple way to update a service with the passphrase we
receive as a parameter ?
Yes, by replying to the Agent API RequestInput D-Bus method call.
HTH,
Patrik
Cf.
http://blog.viraptor.info/post/your-wifi-shows-me-where-you-live-work-and-travel
How does connman handle this? There don't seem to be configuration
options for it.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen, / Best Regards,
Sven Schwedas
Systemadministrator
TAO Beratungs- und Management GmbH | Lendplatz 45
This is what I tried doing it, I am very new to these stuffs :(
DBusMessage * agent_update_passphrase(DBusConnection *connection, char *
serv_str, char * pass)
{
DBusMessage *message, *reply;
DBusError error;
DBusMessageIter iter;
DBusMessageIter args;
ConnMan does a known networks scan, so indeed it leaks the known SSIDs.
We could easily add a main.conf parameter to prevent that.
Sounds good. What would be the trade-offs? More time needed to authenticate?
More time to autoconnect on known-networks basically.
For instance, one passive
Hi Sven,
ConnMan does a known networks scan, so indeed it leaks the known SSIDs.
We could easily add a main.conf parameter to prevent that.
Tomasz
Cf.
http://blog.viraptor.info/post/your-wifi-shows-me-where-you-live-work-and-travel
How does connman handle this? There don't seem to be
Patrik,
Can you please help me out on this ?
Regards,
Ram
-Original Message-
From: connman [mailto:connman-boun...@connman.net] On Behalf Of Patrik Flykt
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:31 PM
To: connman@connman.net
Subject: Re: connman connection policy
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 08:54
On 2015-03-17 12:09, Tomasz Bursztyka wrote:
Hi Sven,
ConnMan does a known networks scan, so indeed it leaks the known SSIDs.
We could easily add a main.conf parameter to prevent that.
Sounds good. What would be the trade-offs? More time needed to authenticate?
Tomasz
Cf.
Hello Patrik,
I tried checking behavior of MoveBefore/MoveAfter even without WiFi.
It's not working as expected and service is not moving to top.
1. Connect Two DIFFERENT technologies(EX: WiFi BT/WiFi Ethernet/ Ethernet
BT) in READY state
2. Call MoveBefore/MoveAfter
3. Check service
On ti, 2015-03-17 at 10:25 +, Kallumari Nagaraja Rao, RammohanX
wrote:
This is what I tried doing it, I am very new to these stuffs :(
DBusMessage * agent_update_passphrase(DBusConnection *connection, char *
serv_str, char * pass)
{
DBusMessage *message, *reply;
DBusError
On 17.03.2015 14:04, Tomasz Bursztyka wrote:
There is an issue however: the hidden SSIDs. These ones, to
autoconnect, definitely need an active scan. We could run it if
only a hidden service is created for instance. But that means we
could still leak some SSIDs - the hidden ones - if we are
On 2015-03-17 16:47, Pasi Sjöholm wrote:
On 17.03.2015 14:04, Tomasz Bursztyka wrote:
There is an issue however: the hidden SSIDs. These ones, to
autoconnect, definitely need an active scan. We could run it if
only a hidden service is created for instance. But that means we
could still leak
16 matches
Mail list logo
