- Original Message -
> From: "Aaron Weitekamp"
> To: "Josh Berkus"
> Cc: "Ben Breard" , "container-tools"
>
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 3:23:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [Container-tools] Namespace
What plans do we have to integrate openshift2nulecule in to OpenShift
itself (AFAIK this is the "export" feature).
On 9 March 2016 at 14:16, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
> On 03/09/2016 10:30 PM, Tomas Kral wrote:
>>
>> After issues [1] [2] we had with getting Openshift2Nulecule
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Indeed Scott. Just started and this might be more a mid-term feature.
> > First we need to fix some other items. Just wanted to mention that I'm
> > considering this as an RFE and have added to my planning board.
>
We
On 03/09/2016 10:30 PM, Tomas Kral wrote:
After issues [1] [2] we had with getting Openshift2Nulecule [3] to ADB I
had discussion with Suraj about distributing Openshift2Nulecule only as
container(similar to Atomic App) rather then as rpm package.
We need both. The reason is we have users for
Can someone confirm that CDK v2 beta 4 doesn't have ELK logging or metrics
enabled.
Also does the latest version of ADB (upstream CDK) have ELK and
metrics/hawkular enabled?
--
Albert T. Wong 黃頌言 | Solution Architect
Red Hat
+1 949-689-6412
http://linkd.in/1qGS9XC, @alberttwong,
After issues [1] [2] we had with getting Openshift2Nulecule [3] to ADB I
had discussion with Suraj about distributing Openshift2Nulecule only as
container(similar to Atomic App) rather then as rpm package.
I'm interested in your thoughts about this.
Advantages:
- separate release cycle from ADB
Just a reminder that there will be two calls today:
9:15 Eastern/14:15 GMT/15:15 CET/19:45 IST - James Strachan and James
Rawlings showing Fabric8, an open source DevOps platform
10:00 Eastern/15:00 GMT/16:00 CET/ 20:30 IST - Clayton Coleman talking
about the vision for OpenShift.
Both will be
On 03/08/2016 07:27 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
Hi,
Here is the issue to track the testing [1]. It also has the build
information.
[1]
https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-atomic-developer-bundle/issues/279
FYI,
Because of an issue [1] introduced by python-docker-py 1.7.0
Indeed Scott. Just started and this might be more a mid-term feature.
First we need to fix some other items. Just wanted to mention that I'm
considering this as an RFE and have added to my planning board.
On 03/09/2016 05:52 AM, Scott McCarty wrote:
> Josh, sadly, I think this is still more vapor