Re: [Container-tools] Namespace for demo images

2016-03-09 Thread Scott McCarty
- Original Message - > From: "Aaron Weitekamp" > To: "Josh Berkus" > Cc: "Ben Breard" , "container-tools" > > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 3:23:11 AM > Subject: Re: [Container-tools] Namespace

Re: [Container-tools] Distribution method for Openshift2Nulecule

2016-03-09 Thread Pete Muir
What plans do we have to integrate openshift2nulecule in to OpenShift itself (AFAIK this is the "export" feature). On 9 March 2016 at 14:16, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: > On 03/09/2016 10:30 PM, Tomas Kral wrote: >> >> After issues [1] [2] we had with getting Openshift2Nulecule

Re: [Container-tools] Namespace for demo images

2016-03-09 Thread Aaron Weitekamp
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: > > Indeed Scott. Just started and this might be more a mid-term feature. > > First we need to fix some other items. Just wanted to mention that I'm > > considering this as an RFE and have added to my planning board. > ​We

Re: [Container-tools] Distribution method for Openshift2Nulecule

2016-03-09 Thread Lalatendu Mohanty
On 03/09/2016 10:30 PM, Tomas Kral wrote: After issues [1] [2] we had with getting Openshift2Nulecule [3] to ADB I had discussion with Suraj about distributing Openshift2Nulecule only as container(similar to Atomic App) rather then as rpm package. We need both. The reason is we have users for

[Container-tools] CDK v2 beta 4 and ELK logging or metrics

2016-03-09 Thread Albert Wong
Can someone confirm that CDK v2 beta 4 doesn't have ELK logging or metrics enabled. Also does the latest version of ADB (upstream CDK) have ELK and metrics/hawkular enabled? -- Albert T. Wong 黃頌言 | Solution Architect Red Hat +1 949-689-6412 http://linkd.in/1qGS9XC, @alberttwong,

[Container-tools] Distribution method for Openshift2Nulecule

2016-03-09 Thread Tomas Kral
After issues [1] [2] we had with getting Openshift2Nulecule [3] to ADB I had discussion with Suraj about distributing Openshift2Nulecule only as container(similar to Atomic App) rather then as rpm package. I'm interested in your thoughts about this. Advantages: - separate release cycle from ADB

[Container-tools] Fabric8/OpenShift calls today

2016-03-09 Thread Pete Muir
Just a reminder that there will be two calls today: 9:15 Eastern/14:15 GMT/15:15 CET/19:45 IST - James Strachan and James Rawlings showing Fabric8, an open source DevOps platform 10:00 Eastern/15:00 GMT/16:00 CET/ 20:30 IST - Clayton Coleman talking about the vision for OpenShift. Both will be

Re: [Container-tools] Need help in testing of ADB 1.7.1 release candidate

2016-03-09 Thread Lalatendu Mohanty
On 03/08/2016 07:27 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: Hi, Here is the issue to track the testing [1]. It also has the build information. [1] https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-atomic-developer-bundle/issues/279 FYI, Because of an issue [1] introduced by python-docker-py 1.7.0

Re: [Container-tools] Namespace for demo images

2016-03-09 Thread Dirk Herrmann
Indeed Scott. Just started and this might be more a mid-term feature. First we need to fix some other items. Just wanted to mention that I'm considering this as an RFE and have added to my planning board. On 03/09/2016 05:52 AM, Scott McCarty wrote: > Josh, sadly, I think this is still more vapor