Re: [Container-tools] atomicapp regresses with Docker 1.10

On 11.03.2016 04:55, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 10 March 2016 at 19:28, Stef Walter wrote: >> This is a heads up that docker 1.10 breaks API in various ways. It broke >> kubernetes among other things. > > Huh, would a plausible symptom of that be "kubectl get node" reporting > a Docker 1.10 node as

Re: [Container-tools] atomicapp regresses with Docker 1.10

On 10 March 2016 at 19:28, Stef Walter wrote: > This is a heads up that docker 1.10 breaks API in various ways. It broke > kubernetes among other things. Huh, would a plausible symptom of that be "kubectl get node" reporting a Docker 1.10 node as Not Ready, even though "curl -L http://127.0.0.1:1

Re: [Container-tools] ADB 1.7.1 is released

On 03/10/2016 02:16 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: > Hi, > > We have released Atomic Developer Bundle [4] version 1.7.1 through CentOS > Atomic SIG. > > It is a bug fix release and have several bug fixes, including : > > * The OpenShift experience in ADB has been enhanced to be more streamlin

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Pete Muir wrote: > On 10 March 2016 at 13:40, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > > > On 03/10/2016 01:14 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote: > >> > >> I saw Pradeepto's write-up on Helm/DM, using Nulecule for the 'bundle' > format with AtomicApp with Helm/DM - does that not mostly c

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

On 03/10/2016 03:21 PM, Pete Muir wrote: > On 10 March 2016 at 13:40, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> >> On 03/10/2016 01:14 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote: >>> >>> I saw Pradeepto's write-up on Helm/DM, using Nulecule for the 'bundle' >>> format with AtomicApp with Helm/DM - does that not mostly complete the

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

On 10 March 2016 at 13:40, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 03/10/2016 01:14 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote: >> >> I saw Pradeepto's write-up on Helm/DM, using Nulecule for the 'bundle' >> format with AtomicApp with Helm/DM - does that not mostly complete the >> picture? > > What exactly do you mean by 'bund

[Container-tools] ADB 1.7.1 is released

Hi, We have released Atomic Developer Bundle [4] version 1.7.1 through CentOS Atomic SIG. It is a bug fix release and have several bug fixes, including : * The OpenShift experience in ADB has been enhanced to be more streamlined and to make version selection easier. * "sccli openshift"

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

On 03/10/2016 01:14 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote: > > I saw Pradeepto's write-up on Helm/DM, using Nulecule for the 'bundle' format > with AtomicApp with Helm/DM - does that not mostly complete the picture? What exactly do you mean by 'bundle' format? Do you mean the way we are packaging things up

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

On 03/10/2016 01:09 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: > On 03/10/2016 11:29 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: >> On 03/10/2016 08:15 PM, Aaron Weitekamp wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Ratnadeep Debnath >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Till now, Nulecule's focus has been to be a spec t

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

On 03/10/2016 11:29 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: On 03/10/2016 08:15 PM, Aaron Weitekamp wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote: Hi all, Till now, Nulecule's focus has been to be a spec to package and ship nested, composable multi container applications.

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

On 03/10/2016 08:15 PM, Aaron Weitekamp wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Ratnadeep Debnath > wrote: Hi all, Till now, Nulecule's focus has been to be a spec to package and ship nested, composable multi container applications. Well, it helps us to

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

I still need to understand how Ansible effects the Nulecule efforts. I understood people are looking into this. Is that happening? It seems to me that there is potentially lots of overlap here. Who from Ansible, if any, is working with the Nulecule folks to make sure we aren't reinventing and re-i

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote: > Hi all, > > Till now, Nulecule's focus has been to be a spec to package and ship > nested, composable multi container applications. Well, it helps us to > focus on a smaller problem and solve it well. This also keeps > implementation of

[Container-tools] Kubernetes dm / helm

Hi All, I have been investigating Kubernetes deployment manager / helm. I have jotted down my observations. I am looking for any kind of feedback on this topic and if we can use it in someway. [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/11TbdEH9ktymJui0mbUpwr37U3cR9KHebO36sdtJTkpw/edit# Thanks, P

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

Great idea. Let me know what you need from me to help you with this - this is my contribution priority for the next 90 days On 10 March 2016 at 04:29, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote: > Hi all, > > Till now, Nulecule's focus has been to be a spec to package and ship > nested, composable multi container a

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Burr Sutter wrote: > I like the proposal! :-) > > I agree we should encourage adoption, zero barriers, etc, but I think we should go in the other ​direction with the spec: - focus on the high-level definition of the application and service discovery, e.g. I want t

Re: [Container-tools] 'easy-fix' label for adb-atomic-developer-bundle and adb-utils

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Pradeepto Bhattacharya < pradee...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thursday, March 10, 2016 04:33:32 PM Praveen Kumar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Today I asked DV to create an 'easy-fix' label for 2 of our > > projects[0][1] under projectatomic namespace. This will allo

Re: [Container-tools] 'easy-fix' label for adb-atomic-developer-bundle and adb-utils

Hi, On Thursday, March 10, 2016 04:33:32 PM Praveen Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > Today I asked DV to create an 'easy-fix' label for 2 of our > projects[0][1] under projectatomic namespace. This will allow us to > tag simple issues which need less effort and also attract newbie to > contribute (This is

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

I like the proposal! :-) On Thursday, March 10, 2016, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote: > Hi all, > > Till now, Nulecule's focus has been to be a spec to package and ship > nested, composable multi container applications. Well, it helps us to > focus on a smaller problem and solve it well. This also keep

Re: [Container-tools] Distribution method for Openshift2Nulecule

Yes, I think the most obvious workflow for people will be via oc export, the webconsole etc. It's also one less moving part for integrators to worry about (e.g. devstudio). On 10 March 2016 at 03:21, Tomas Kral wrote: > I haven't spoke about integrating this to oc with anyone from OpenShift yet.

[Container-tools] atomicapp regresses with Docker 1.10

This is a heads up that docker 1.10 breaks API in various ways. It broke kubernetes among other things. But for atomicapp, one of the things it does is prevent an old 'docker' client from performing certain tasks against a 1.10 'docker' daemon. For example: [root@localhost atomicapp]# docker ima

[Container-tools] atomicapp regresses with Docker 1.10

This is a heads up that docker 1.10 breaks API in various ways. It broke kubernetes among other things. But for atomicapp, one of the things it does is prevent an old 'docker' client from performing certain tasks against a 1.10 'docker' daemon. For example: [root@localhost atomicapp]# docker ima

[Container-tools] 'easy-fix' label for adb-atomic-developer-bundle and adb-utils

Hi, Today I asked DV to create an 'easy-fix' label for 2 of our projects[0][1] under projectatomic namespace. This will allow us to tag simple issues which need less effort and also attract newbie to contribute (This is something Fedora[2] folks are using quite a long time with positive results).

Re: [Container-tools] Initial demo on CentOS Community Container pipeline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/03/16 09:43, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote: > Hi all, > > We have recorded a demo on the current workflow of the CentOS > Community Container pipeline we have been working on. You can find > it at [1]. Let us know what you think. > > [1]: https://ww

[Container-tools] Initial demo on CentOS Community Container pipeline

Hi all, We have recorded a demo on the current workflow of the CentOS Community Container pipeline we have been working on. You can find it at [1]. Let us know what you think. [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s5jHc4F20o Thanks, rtnpro -- Ratnadeep Debnath, https://www.waartaa.com GPG Finge

[Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

Hi all, Till now, Nulecule's focus has been to be a spec to package and ship nested, composable multi container applications. Well, it helps us to focus on a smaller problem and solve it well. This also keeps implementation of Nulecule, e.g., atomicapp, lean and simple. However, is it enough? I

Re: [Container-tools] Distribution method for Openshift2Nulecule

I haven't spoke about integrating this to oc with anyone from OpenShift yet. I agree it would be nice to have this as part of `oc export` command. It is export feature with few added things: Nulecule file, Dockerfile and modified artifacts for Kubernetes. But I would like to keep it separate for