On 03/17/2017 04:29 PM, Lance Ball wrote:
This has been a great conversation. Thanks everyone for your input.
One thing that kind of got lost in the shuffle, though is this.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:37 PM Lance Ball > wrote:
I also think
On 17/03/17 20:29, Lance Ball wrote:
> CentOS -> Node 4, 5, 6, 7
...
> Anyone have feedback or concerns about this idea?
I would be absolutely thrilled to host this on registry.centos.org built
on centos-atomic container. happy to do upto-the-minute with tag's
marking weekly and monthly build
Hello,
On 17/03/17 15:57, Ben Breard wrote:
> rhel7-atomic is a base image built from Red Hat Enterprise Linux rpms.
> The fedora & CentOS versions will be very similar, but composed from
> fedora & centOS rpms. I have encouraged them to adopt the same naming
> scheme, but that wasn't something
This has been a great conversation. Thanks everyone for your input. One
thing that kind of got lost in the shuffle, though is this.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:37 PM Lance Ball wrote:
> I also think that, in addition to the current OpenShift offerings for
> Node.js on RHEL and
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Lance Ball wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Ben. Adding everyone else back in...
>
> I honestly don't mean to be obtuse here, but I'm still a little confused.
> Please bear with me and a couple more questions.
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:40 PM
On 03/16/2017 02:17 PM, Ben Breard wrote:
> Thanks Brian,
>
> First, Fedora & CentOS versions of this container are in the works and will
> be available soon, if they're not already. Sorry, I don't track the community
> side as closely as I'd like to these days due to bandwidth.
Fedora
Adding Ben Breard as this will be interesting to him.
On 03/16/2017 12:37 PM, Lance Ball wrote:
Hi all
You may have seen recently that a few of us have started to maintain
some up-to-the-minute Node.js builder images for Docker and Openshift
[1]. At the moment, we have up to date images for