I'll create some examples asap.
Emmanuel
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Some code using a couple of Entities as examples would be nice :-)
I still think the API would be verbose.
Thanks,
Rahul
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Emmanuel
thx Rahul for this link.
We are #2 now :)
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:51 AM, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Any one seen this:
http://www.wakaleo.com/polls/18-what-continuous-integration-server-are-you-using-in-2008
Another 5 steps to get to #1
:-)
Rahul
yes, it is an error.
Emmanuel
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The users one seems to be missing the users. prefix in both - is there
a reason for that?
- Brett
On 29/02/2008, at 8:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: evenisse
Date: Thu Feb
, Emmanuel Venisse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I created the svn group with all pmc members. The next step will be
the svn
move to the new location.
I'd like to see the move done for the end of the week, so if you
have some
changes to commit, you must do it asap.
If you have local changes
why 1.1.x?
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm a bit confused about the current branch scenarios, we have 1.2 on
a branch and 2.0 on trunk. Several changes have been made on each, and
none merged to the other.
Can I suggest we merge all branch
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:55 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/02/2008, at 9:52 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
why 1.1.x?
in case there was a bugfix release on 1.1? I thought that was what the
branch was for... maintenance of 1.1.
or is there going to be 2 completely
(INFRA-1532) and placed you in the chairs group
already.
Cheers,
Brett
On 21/02/2008, at 8:30 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Cool, great news.
Thanks Brett (and others)
Emmanuel
On Feb 20, 2008 9:15 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Congratulations - the board
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/02/2008, at 10:39 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
I created the svn group with all pmc members. The next step will be
the svn
move to the new location.
I'd like to see the move done for the end of the week, so
As I already explained, I'm in favor of named queries
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to go ahead and pick up something towards the next Continuum
iteration. I am thinking refactoring ContinuumStore interface as was
earlier discussed on
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2) Criteria vs Named Queries: I am not convinced (yet) that Named
queries are the way to go. I did some digging around, they are indeed
best practices for JPA but I think the decision merits other
consideration(s).
review/update/comment as appropriate.
Also, I think we start cutting out concrete JIRA tasks from those
umbrella issues listed on that page above and assign them fix versions.
Thanks,
Rahul
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Hi
I started a document [1] with my ideas about Continuum 2.
As you
Cool, great news.
Thanks Brett (and others)
Emmanuel
On Feb 20, 2008 9:15 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Congratulations - the board passed the resolution we submitted.
We'll have some work to do to get set up over the next month, but
other than that it's business as
Thanks Brett.
I'm +1 to open it.
Emmanuel
On Feb 13, 2008 8:43 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, permissions changes are non-destructive :)
On 13/02/2008, at 6:33 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
+1 as long as editing it requires a login :-)
Should I hold off the migration from
(if at all we break it up) - sounds reasonable?
I'm agree.
Thanks,
Rahul
Thanks for your comments,
Emmanuel
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Hi
I started a document [1] with my ideas about Continuum 2.
As you can see in this doc, I want to add lot of things in the next
version.
Feel
A profile can't be applied to a project because generally, users want to
build their projects for different environment.
Maybe, we'll add a defaut project profile in future versions that can be
overriden in the build definition
Emmanuel
On Jan 25, 2008 11:31 AM, Benoit Decherf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
need to toy around
with them a bit), and not sure how the implementation would end up
making use of named queries, but if anyone else has any opinions, I am
keen to understand.
Cheers,
Rahul
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
As Christian said, named queries are pre-compiled to SQL. With dynamic
The continuuum-1.x is created
Emmanuel
On Jan 21, 2008 11:08 PM, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'll probably create a new branch for 1.x dev and will reserve the trunk
for 2.x dev. I think I'll do it this week or the next (if you're agree, of
course :) )
I'll try to send
:
Thanks Emmanuel! Responses inlined...
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Hi Rahul,
After few days to look at JPA, I'm sure now it would be good to use
it
instead of the actual JDO/JPOX (I know JPOX 1.2 support JPA).
The code is very easy to write and to read with JPA.
About your continuum
I think it would be good to introduce some partial object like
ProjectGroupWithoutProjects that we can use in JPQL request so we won't use
non detached fields and we'll know exactly what we use and where.
Emmanuel
On Jan 21, 2008 10:59 PM, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As Christian
Hi,
I'll probably create a new branch for 1.x dev and will reserve the trunk for
2.x dev. I think I'll do it this week or the next (if you're agree, of
course :) )
I'll try to send at the same time my ideas for 2.x so we'll can discuss
about them.
Emmanuel
nominations?
I have the current committers list as:
Maria Odea Ching
Joakim Erdfelt
Olivier Lamy
Trygve Laugstol
Jesse McConnell
Brett Porter
Edwin Punzalan
Carlos Sanchez
Wendy Smoak
Rahul Thakur
Emmanuel Venisse
Kenney Westerhof
Andrew Williams
Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should
on moving forward with this?
- Brett
On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level
Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more chance to
grow.
My concern
I fixed it.
About the doc, I'll work on it this week and it will be deploywhen the vote
will be ok.
Emmanuel
Emmanuel Venisse a écrit :
I'll fix it today and will resend a message when you'll can retest.
Emmanuel
Stuart James Penrose a écrit :
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
The binaries
Hi,
Continuum 1.1 Final is ready for release
The highlights are
- bug fixes
- A new backup tool with xmlrpc for continuum db (not the users db)
The Release Notes is available there:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540styleName=Htmlversion=13605
The binaries are
Hi,
All issues for Continuum 1.1 final will be closed this week, so I'll try to
prepare the release next Friday (Nov. 16)
Before to do the release, I'll try (I'm not sure yet) to add pagination in the
build results list page to save some memory when users call it for projects
with lot of
Done.
Emmanuel
olivier lamy a écrit :
Hi,
Is it possible someone with karma maven.zones kill processes ?
Thanks,
--
Olivier
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 8 nov. 2007 02:00
Subject: [continuum build trunk - SKIPPED - checkout] Thu Nov
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi,
I'm anticipating this could be a common question after 1.1 is released -
was there a decision made about whether the data converter should
support importing from 1.0.3 projects?
No decision for the moment.
I know this was something I was going to implement
We can set includeBuildResult to false in application.xml
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi,
Got a request for vmbuild for a project to limit the size of the build
log emails (since they are huge) - are we able to customise email
templates easily enough in the current version?
I'm
, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
We can set includeBuildResult to false in application.xml
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi,
Got a request for vmbuild for a project to limit the size of the
build log emails (since they are huge) - are we able to customise
email templates easily enough in the current
Jesse,
What is this change???
We don't have migrated to alpha-4 yet.
Emmanuel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Author: jmcconnell
Date: Wed Oct 31 13:42:00 2007
New Revision: 590819
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=590819view=rev
Log:
revert to redback alpha 3 pending HAUS-1590
Modified:
Damien Lecan a écrit :
here
## Some things to discuss for the french :
release was not translated by Damien.
What about : diffuser or distribuer ? At worst faire une 'release'
It was translated by Damien but I reverted it because I always use release in
french :) but if you prefer
Damien Lecan a écrit :
release was not translated by Damien.
What about : diffuser or distribuer ? At worst faire une 'release'
It was translated by Damien but I reverted it because I always use release in
french :) but if you prefer 'diffuser' or 'distribuer', it's ok.
I think faire une
Below are the results of this vote:
3 Binding Votes (Wendy, Brett, and Myself)
3 Non-binding vote (Olivier, Damien, Ossi)
I'll finalize the release and will send an update.
Thanks,
Emmanuel
Emmanuel Venisse a écrit :
Hi,
Continuum 1.1-beta-4 is ready for release
The highlights are
- lot
The Continuum team is pleased to announce the Continuum 1.1-beta-4 release
Highlights are:
* lot of bug fixes
* A new page to view the build queue
* Customization of mail subject
You can grab the latest release from the download page :
If possible, I'd like to see more votes for this release from committers/PMC
Thanks.
Emmanuel
Emmanuel Venisse a écrit :
Hi,
Continuum 1.1-beta-4 is ready for release
The highlights are
- lot of bug fixes
- A new page to view the build queue
- Customization of mail subject
The Release
Wendy Smoak a écrit :
On 10/29/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If possible, I'd like to see more votes for this release from committers/PMC
Sorry, I missed this until Sunday evening. I'll take a look at it tonight.
Thanks
(Continuum releases tend to come as a surprise
Damien Lecan a écrit :
Hello,
I noticed new french translation in next 1.1-beta-4 version.
This is a great job to translate such application in french, but some
words should have been reviewed before being applied.
So how can we discuss about misspelling, about words used in
sentences,
instructions are the same from previous version, replace beta-2 by beta-3 and
beta-3 by beta-4 :)
http://maven.apache.org/continuum/guides/mini/guide-data-management.html
Emmanuel
Dan Tran a écrit :
have instructions to migrate beta-3 database to beta-4?
-D
On 10/25/07, Emmanuel Venisse
Hi,
Continuum 1.1-beta-4 is ready for release
The highlights are
- lot of bug fixes
- A new page to view the build queue
- Customization of mail subject
The Release Notes is available there:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=10540fixfor=13727
The binaries
Where is your settings.xml? It must be under ${user.home}/.m2/
Emmanuel
Damien Lecan a écrit :
I removed few days ago some tables in the model because they wasn't used, but
they are exported by DMC beta-3.
Remove testResult tags in the xml file and it should be ok.
I'll add some instructions
Hmm, file an issue and I'll try to fix it (but I don't have a proxy to do a
real test)
Emmanuel
Damien Lecan a écrit :
Where is your settings.xml? It must be under ${user.home}/.m2/
My settings.xml is under ${user.home}/.m2/
Here is what I get when I try to execute DMC and then
)
at org.jpox.store.rdbms.RDBMSManager.init(RDBMSManager.java:241)
-- No suitable driver found
Emmanuel Venisse schrieb:
Hi,
Continuum 1.1-beta-4 is ready for release
The highlights are
- lot of bug fixes
- A new page to view the build queue
- Customization of mail subject
The Release
Hi,
I'd like to merge continuum-site_1.1 branch in trunk tomorrow (before to start
the release process of 1.1-beta-4)
Are you ok?
Emmanuel
Wendy Smoak a écrit :
On 10/16/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks! The site builds locally now, I'll give publishing it another try later.
Success! It starts here: http://maven.apache.org/continuum/ref/latest/
(As with Archiva, 'latest' is symlinked to the most recent
Hi,
In jira, we have now 3 issues opened, I don't think I'll can fix CONTINUUM-1388 before the release because it require changes and releases of remote-resources-plugin, apache-jar-resource-bundle and
maven parent pom.
I'm not sure to fix CONTINUUM-1475 too.
About the docs, we have already
think it's very close, I wonder if it might be worth having one last
beta to get a bit of feedback to see if there is any blockers while the
docs, etc are done?
I understand
Just my 2c, I'm happy either way :)
- Brett
On 17/10/2007, at 6:31 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Hi,
In jira, we
I modified redback-legacy pom to fix it.
The problem was that we patch generated modello files in process-sources phase
due to a bug in modellobut the javadoc reporting is executed in
generate-sources phase so our patch wasn't applied.
Emmanuel
Wendy Smoak a écrit :
On 10/15/07, Wendy Smoak
What is the problem?
Emmanuel
Damien Lecan a écrit :
Hello,
Continuum and Archiva share the same use of appserver.base variable.
This is a problem when they are deployed together, in Tomcat for example.
How to specify one appserver.base for continuum and one for Archiva ?
I don't know
Hi,
We are near the end of 1.1, it's time to discuss of 1.2 roadmap :)
For this new version, my vision is:
- Rewrite all the UI with a full GWT site. I want to migrate to GWT
because we need better performance on the UI even if it is correct now.
The second point is that with GWT (and Ajax in
On 10/3/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are near the end of 1.1, it's time to discuss of 1.2 roadmap :)
For this new version, my vision is:
Sounds good in general.
I'm not thrilled with GWT-- I'm suspicious of code generation-- but
since I'm not doing the work I'm
I think the best way would be to allow the user to chosse his own template, if
a template isn't define, continuum will choose the default.
About the issue, I closed it because the mail is customizable (subject, print
or not the build output...) but if we can allow new templates, we'll can
Tomislav Stojcevich a écrit :
I think it should be re-opened since there still is no way to
completely customize the template itself other than turning on and off
the output and summary. In my case the turning on the summary wiith
the build output turned off will give me what I want but it is
Wendy,
All continuum conf will be externalized in 1.2
Emmanuel
Wendy Smoak a écrit :
On 10/1/07, Tomislav Stojcevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does everybody think about adding a step to the continuum-webapp
project that extracts the templates from the continuum-core.jar and
puts a copy
notifier defined?
3) each Project/Project Group?
and,
4) What is the order of precedence if there were custom templates
defined at different levels?
IMO, I think we should persist the notifiers in the database itself in a
separate field.
WDYT?
Rahul
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Tomislav Stojcevich
Wendy Smoak a écrit :
On 10/2/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can't move all in the db because schema updates can be a pain.
In 1.2 all the conf, actually written in application.xml, will be move to an
external file. This file will can be stored in ${user.home} so each
On the continuum site ;)
Emmanuel
I am Who i am a écrit :
where is beta-3 ?
On 9/25/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be better to use 1.1-beta-3 if you don't want to migrate your db
between versions. I released it and I'll do the official announce in few
hours when all
The Continuum team is pleased to announce the Continuum 1.1-beta-3 release
Highlights are:
* lot of bug fixes
* xwork/webwork update to fix remote code exploit in forms
* mail notification to latest committers
* LDAP authentication
* performance improvement
You can grab the latest
I'm agree
Emmanuel
Joakim Erdfelt a écrit :
The order is a little odd.
I would personally put the User's Guide as more important than the
Developer's Guides.
The FAQ should be higher in the list too.
- Joakim
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Hi,
Here is the structure of the documentation I'd
Wendy Smoak a écrit :
On 9/24/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For 1.0.3 doc, we'll let it as is but we must remove specific 1.1 doc in it.
How will this be handled? Do we need continuum/1.0.3 and
continuum/1.1 on the website?
I don't know but if we remove 1.0.3 doc, how
Below are the results of this vote:
3 Binding Votes (Wendy, Jesse, and Myself)
1 Non-binding vote (Olivier)
I'll finalize the release and will send an update.
Thanks,
Emmanuel
Emmanuel Venisse a écrit :
Hi,
Continuum 1.1-beta-3 is ready for release
The highlights are
- lot of bug fixes
It would be better to use 1.1-beta-3 if you don't want to migrate your db
between versions. I released it and I'll do the official announce in few hours
when all files will be mirrored.
but the continuum doc for tomcat is available there:
olivier lamy a écrit :
Hi,
* Yes it's stored in the database with the buildResult (like a clone and add
of the buildDefinition).
* Yes it is in the email.
* It looks we have to store the buildDefinition even if the scm
update/checkout failed
no, if the build fails in checkout/update, the
Hmm, I'll look at it to fix it definitively
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi,
Note this build:
http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResults.action?projectId=272projectGroupId=8
It is stuck in error - but I thought this was fixed in beta-3? Could it
be because it is an error on
Brett,
you want to hide it when it is in progress or it is empty too?
If it is empty, it's a bug but I don't want to hide it when the build is
started.
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
also when it is in progress
On 24/09/2007, at 6:50 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
olivier lamy a écrit
Hi,
Here is the structure of the documentation I'd like to have for 1.1-final.
Installation/Upgrade Guides
Installation (standalone, webapp, service...)
Release Notes
Upgrade
Administrator's Guides
Managing Users and Security
Adding Project Group
Rahul Thakur a écrit :
I have been wanting to pop this questions for sometime now.
For generation/maintenance of continuum-model:
a) Why are we using Modello? More specifically what does it buy us? I
know the model is expressed as xml and separate from Java sources,
but I don't see a benefit
Hi,
Commands to run will be available when we'll update the site for the release of
1.1-beta-3
For the moment, it isn't possible to migrate a mysql db (and other db that
isn't derby) with this tool. We'll fix it in next version.
But maybe you can write a patch for it so you'll can migrate, I
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1481
Emmanuel Venisse a écrit :
Changes must be done in
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-data-management/data-management-cli/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuum/management/DataManagementCli.java
Look at the end
Damien Lecan a écrit :
2007/9/21, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1481
Ok, I've got a patch which allows data-management-cli (dmc) to use
Mysql jdbc driver class or any other driver BUT :
- dmc always fails to download dependencies. It doesn't
It isn't too late for 1.1, we're releasing beta-3 and final won't be normally
before one month.
For your patch, please attach it to an issue.
Emmanuel
CAUSSE David MTP CAP GEM a écrit :
Hi,
I send to the list a patch to add better support for SCM providers that
honour the relativePath
You can fix it by setting LC_ALL.
Some threads give the solution:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-continuum-users/200709.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-users/200705.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Emmanuel
jrduncans a écrit :
Emmanuel Venisse
/plexus/application.xml for
LDAP configuration point to documentation at a broken URL:
apps/continuum/webapp/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/plexus/application.xml
-Stephen
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
You can fix it by setting LC_ALL.
Some threads give the solution:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox
CAUSSE David MTP CAP GEM a écrit :
Hi,
in
org.apache.maven.continuum.core.action.CheckoutProjectContinuumAction.execute(132)
The default build definition is updated with the relative path into a
finally block when relateivePath is not empty.
This action shouldn't be done when first
Hi,
Continuum 1.1-beta-3 is ready for release
The highlights are
- lot of bug fixes
- LDAP support for authentication (thanks jesse)
- performance improvement
- committer mail notification
The Release Notes is available there:
CAUSSE David MTP CAP GEM a écrit :
Hi,
in org.apache.maven.continuum.scm.DefaultContinuumScm.checkOut(140)
I can see :
context.put( pomRelativePath, res.getRelativePathProjectDirectory() );
It seems to be unused, am I wrong?
right, it's a bug and I fixed it few seconds ago.
It is exactly
Can you file an issue and attach to it your patch? We'll look at it later.
Thanks
Emmanuel
Dariusz Nowak a écrit :
Dear Developers,
For a long time I have tried to be able to add a new Maven2 project from
our SVN repository.
Unfortunately it was not possible neither in 1.0.2 nor 1.1-b2.
Wendy Smoak a écrit :
When I add a multi-module project, the project group summary shows the
'cancel build' icon for the first project, and 'queued build' icons
for the rest.
This is incorrect, nothing is building or queued at that time.
Not exactly. All projects are in queue. It isn't the
I think it's up to date but I'll verify.
cloumns that are used by Continuum are : changelog, checkout, update
The release part use checkin, status, tag columns too
edit/unedit and login columns can be used by some scm tools.
Emmanuel
Wendy Smoak a écrit :
I'm in need of an SCM Matrix for a
Without sql command:
1- with data-management: export the db
java -Xmx512m -jar data-management-cli-1.1-beta-2-app.jar -buildsJdbcUrl
jdbc:derby:path_continuum_old_db -mode EXPORT
2- start Continuum to create an empty db (with the good schema)
3- stop Continuum
4- import datas with
+1
Wendy, can you file an issue?
Olivier, do you want to work on it?
Emmanuel
Wendy Smoak a écrit :
I think the form for adding a new Installation should be split up into
one form for environment variables, and another for the Ant/Maven/JDK
installations.
The current web UI is confusing, we
Maybe like notifier screens, we can have a process an installation in two steps:
screen1: choose the installation type (tool or environment variable)
screen2(tool): version, path, parameters...
screen2(env var): name, value
Emmanuel
LAMY Olivier a écrit :
Hi,
Displaying the field
Graham Leggett a écrit :
On Mon, September 3, 2007 12:39 pm, Graham Leggett wrote:
When I enter the POM url of
https://svn.server/svn/alchemy/Rhapsody/Development/native/trunk/pom.xml;
I get the error:
The specified resource isn't a file or the protocol used isn't allowed.
Looking at the
I'd prefer too ;)
Brett Porter a écrit :
Should this be open until we actually switch? :)
On 01/09/2007, at 6:14 AM, Jesse McConnell (JIRA) wrote:
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jesse McConnell
Brett Porter a écrit :
I think I understand this problem more now.
the svn errors are a transient problem - it occurs before a build takes
place, but they are recorded as a built result. So when they succeed
again, no build occurs because no update has taken place.
I see two possible
The problem is in beta-2 when the fresh build option is checked and the
project contains lot of files in scm. The build controller merged scm results with old
build results but it mustn't do it.
I fixed this problem yesterday.
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
We get this occasionally on
The patch doesn't seem to be complete, it's only a new class with a patch in
other classes or components.xml
I'll look at it in details to see if we can include it in 1.1
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi,
I know where in feature freeze, but I'd really like this and it has a
patch :)
Brett Porter a écrit :
On 29/08/2007, at 7:48 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
2) rebuild a project that was in error state before.
I think it's the best solution for now and won't be a lot of work.
agreed... can we sneak this into the 1.1 JIRA? :D
sure, I don't think we already have
4 binding +1's from PMC members: Brett, Stephane, Deng, Emmanuel
I started to deployed all things.
Thanks,
Emmanuel
Emmanuel Venisse a écrit :
Hi,
Continuum 1.1-beta-2 is ready for release
The highlights are
- lot of bug fixes
- Installations/profiles screens improvement
- screen flow
Change subject ;)
Emmanuel
Emmanuel Venisse a écrit :
4 binding +1's from PMC members: Brett, Stephane, Deng, Emmanuel
I started to deployed all things.
Thanks,
Emmanuel
Emmanuel Venisse a écrit :
Hi,
Continuum 1.1-beta-2 is ready for release
The highlights are
- lot of bug fixes
The maven/Continuum team is pleased to announce the Continuum 1.1-beta-2 release
Highlights are:
* lot of bug fixes
* Installations/profiles screens improvement
* screen flow improvement in Add Project part
* cancellable builds
You can grab the latest release from:
M2_HOME was changed in ci_continuum.sh but it wasn't in .profile.
I'm changing it and will see if it's better
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
is this just a bad env on the zone? might be a hint that the release
stuff could have a problem with certain environments too - worth checking.
On
Thanks.
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Files as 1389 and 1390, with some additional comments about the
alwaysSend bit.
On 11/08/2007, at 2:59 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Yes they are improvments requests to file. I'm not sure about 2)
because we already have the alwaysSend parameter
Hi,
Continuum 1.1-beta-2 is ready for release
The highlights are
- lot of bug fixes
- Installations/profiles screens improvement
- screen flow improvement in Add Project part
- cancellable builds
The Release Notes is available there:
ok, I'll look at it
Christian Gruber a écrit :
I wonder if this could be expanded to include an alternate reference
with the SCM version number being used as a build identifier. While
this would suck with CVS, with P4 or SVN it would tend to better
identify the build, as continuum build
+1 to upgrade before Continuum 1.1-beta-2
Emmanuel
Jesse McConnell a écrit :
I released the alpha-2 of redback 1.0 this morning. It is working its way
out into the main repositories and when its there I think we can safely
upgrade continuum and archiva to it. Rather excited, this is the
Brett Porter a écrit :
On 02/08/2007, at 7:46 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
For a project notifier, I think we can keep what we have actually, but
for a group notifier, we can send a single mail by project group.
The mail can be sent after the build of the latest project of the
group, I don't
How many beta do you want to do? I think 2 or 3 will be enough. But I'm agree
we can't resolve all beta-2 issues by Aug 15.
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi,
How do people feel about planning betas to fit into: Aug 15, Aug 29, Sep
12, Sep 26? (for releases, votes are the monday before)
I think null value will be enough. I think we'll need to test the null value in
the UI but it isn't a problem.
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi,
I've narrowed down the problem in upgrading from alpha-2 to beta-1 to
the following model change:
field
For a project notifier, I think we can keep what we have actually, but for a
group notifier, we can send a single mail by project group.
The mail can be sent after the build of the latest project of the group, I don't think it will be a problem to know if the project is the latest and we won't
I will look at them this week, sorry for the delay.
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Anyone have any thoughts on these, or should I just go ahead and make
the changes?
(Sorry Emmanuel, I know you've been offline a bit recently :)
Cheers,
Brett
On 25/07/2007, at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Venisse
1 - 100 of 474 matches
Mail list logo
