Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-07-18 Thread Brett Porter
I had a look at this, and added "high" next to the ones that I thought were high, and realised it was all but two. So I took the column out and moved those two to a 1.2 roadmap. Maybe we can break that down into 1.2, 2.0, etc. as we go and just keep this page as the "this is what we're doing a

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-07-12 Thread Jesse McConnell
it disappeared into the ether of the mailing list? :) I still think its a good idea, thanks for bringing it back up...could be very useful on some of the larger issues like security and project groups, etc.. jesse On 7/12/06, Rinku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Just wondering what happened

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-07-12 Thread Rinku
Hi, Just wondering what happened to this idea: http://www.nabble.com/2.1-Design-and-Process-tf1617559.html#a4383722 Cheers, Rahul Jesse McConnell wrote: hi everyone, I have been trying to help emmanuel some with pulling together the roadmap for Continuum 1.1 on the wiki and maybe help organ

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-07-03 Thread Brett Porter
On 3/07/2006 7:17 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: So you're suggesting we not doing any official alpha/beta releases? Right. - Brett -- Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Apache Maven - http://maven.apache.org/ Better Builds with Maven - http://library.mergere.com/

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-07-03 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 3 Jul 06, at 9:30 AM 3 Jul 06, Brett Porter wrote: On 28/06/2006 8:40 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: When we last discussed it on the development process, we talked about instead doing regular promotion of the automated builds (eg, roughly once a week we say "this is a stable build with some

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-07-03 Thread Brett Porter
On 28/06/2006 8:40 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: When we last discussed it on the development process, we talked about instead doing regular promotion of the automated builds (eg, roughly once a week we say "this is a stable build with something new/a good fix/etc, let's ask people to test it"). I

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-06-28 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Trygve Laugstøl a écrit : +1 to most stuff, comments inline. Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, I started to define the roadmap of continuum 1.1. It will be done normally tomorrow. The major first things to do in this roadmap are: - Reimplementation of authentication/authorization management (

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-06-28 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
ok, I think the roadmap is done now. We have 159 issues. I'll be happy if we can include all these issues in 1.1 :-) Emmanuel Emmanuel Venisse a écrit : Hi, I started to define the roadmap of continuum 1.1. It will be done normally tomorrow. The major first things to do in this roadmap are

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-06-28 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
- customization of the add project feature. In this part, I think to add a multi-project as a multiple projects or as a single project, scm connection string to use, add with a scm url, add all modules by a scm connection instead of an url contruction based on project url provided in the add sc

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-06-28 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
- Remove JDO (at least jpox) because it the source of lot of our issues +1 My only opinion on this is to think about it, but save the work until we bump into the next big problem that is going to require a lot of effort to fix. It seems stable enough in 1.0.3 and if it remains that way thr

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-06-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 28 Jun 06, at 10:52 AM 28 Jun 06, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Jason van Zyl a écrit : On 27 Jun 06, at 10:04 PM 27 Jun 06, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, I started to define the roadmap of continuum 1.1. It will be done normally tomorrow. Are we deciding that these are the things are going t

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-06-28 Thread Carlos Sanchez
On 6/28/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jason van Zyl a écrit : > > On 27 Jun 06, at 10:04 PM 27 Jun 06, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I started to define the roadmap of continuum 1.1. It will be done >> normally tomorrow. > > Are we deciding that these are the things a

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-06-28 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Jason van Zyl a écrit : On 27 Jun 06, at 10:04 PM 27 Jun 06, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, I started to define the roadmap of continuum 1.1. It will be done normally tomorrow. Are we deciding that these are the things are going to be in 1.1 and take as long as we need? I would prefer that

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-06-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 27 Jun 06, at 10:04 PM 27 Jun 06, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, I started to define the roadmap of continuum 1.1. It will be done normally tomorrow. Are we deciding that these are the things are going to be in 1.1 and take as long as we need? I would prefer that myself. Looking below

Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-06-27 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Hi, I started to define the roadmap of continuum 1.1. It will be done normally tomorrow. The major first things to do in this roadmap are: - Reimplementation of authentication/authorization management (CONTINUUM-542 and CONTINUUM-513): this will be done by carlos with acegi. Carlos will integ