http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|3.1-3mdk|3.1.2-1mdk
--- Additional Commen
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-10 22:31 ---
I did a review on Mandrake 9.0 where I called into question the omission of the
kdeartwork package.
Simply said, Mandrake 9.1 will be a desktop distribution and its us
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments F
bah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 23:09 ---
> Yup gotta agree there.
> Emacs = :(
> kdeartwork = :)
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Warly
bah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 23:09 ---
> Yup gotta agree there.
> Emacs = :(
> kdeartwork = :)
>
It will be included on the powerpack and prosuite (all cooker i
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 23:09 ---
Yup gotta agree there.
Emacs = :(
kdeartwork = :)
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someon
On Friday 07 March 2003 17:00, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 20:43, jokerman64 wrote:
> > I don't think the package is essential but I in no way think that it
> > should be left out. I was pretty pissed the last time the screensavers
> > were left out and don't want to see this hap
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 20:43, jokerman64 wrote:
> I don't think the package is essential but I in no way think that it should
> be left out. I was pretty pissed the last time the screensavers were left out
> and don't want to see this happening again. For those of you who don't think
> the screen
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 19:40 ---
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 04:02, bgmilne wrote:
(seeing that a bit of levity is needed around here.) Hey I've got it
remove emacs! I use screensavers more than I us
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments F
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 01:15 ---
I like the splitting idea. Maybe a 2-5MB kdemoreartwork-basic RPM to get the most
interesting parts in.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
On Thursday 06 March 2003 2:24 pm, Jan Ciger wrote:
> On Thursday 06 March 2003 19:39, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 17:26, andre wrote:
> > > On Thursday 06 March 2003 09:17, waschk wrote:
> > > > --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 2003-03-06 09:17 -
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-06 20:29 ---
I would suggest that screensavers *are* important. If the problem is the
size of KDEartwork as a whole, split it. Include kdeartwork-screensavers
and leave the rest fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 06 March 2003 19:39, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 17:26, andre wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 March 2003 09:17, waschk wrote:
> > > --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-06
> > > 09:17 --- Hey, this is
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 17:26, andre wrote:
> On Thursday 06 March 2003 09:17, waschk wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-06
> > 09:17 --- Hey, this is no important package, it's 12 MB of stuff that
> > can be better used for applications.
> >
>
> divi
On Thursday 06 March 2003 09:17, waschk wrote:
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-06
> 09:17 --- Hey, this is no important package, it's 12 MB of stuff that
> can be better used for applications.
>
divide it up in essential and pretty
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-06 14:50 ---
*sigh* Is this really that important?
Did you read that article the other day about interface cruft? That's
exactly what screensavers are. They were introduced because,
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |minor
--- Additional Comments From
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
--- Additional Comments From [E
19 matches
Mail list logo
