On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 03:14, Robert L Martin wrote:
to be honest my french is nonexistant (i used BabelFish to get the
french version)
I think it gave you presses as in wine presses, not presses as in
publishing presses...:)
--
adamw
On Friday 31 October 2003 10:19 pm, Robert L Martin wrote:
Daouda LO wrote:
Really funny :))
Nice catch about the translation, Jan!
Roger, Arreter la presse (des CDS) is a better translation for
STOP THE PRESSE(S).
I just hope that somebody did yell whatever is correct or else
Dude, My
Greg Meyer wrote:
Dude, My cd drive is dead is going to be heard here in the US (Dell
uses LG cdroms in some systems)
:-)
and i would be very upset if i PAID for an OS and had this kind of Issue.
I'd be more upset about getting a CDROM drive that was so obviously
handicapped.
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 11:19, Robert L Martin wrote:
i would be very upset if i PAID for an OS and had this kind of
Issue.
Robert, I would be very upset if I paid for an ATAPI-compliant CD-ROM
drive and somebody sold me a non-compliant LG motorised coffee-cup
holder instead.
Cheers; Leon
Robert L Martin wrote:
SomeDrake needs to post when the official LG-SAFE isos are ready
Why not just leave everyone in the dark? That would be better? (IOW, no
kidding, but the ISOs aren't available).
(im
going to assume that
somebody yelled STOP THE PRESSES (aka via BF ARRÊTEZ LES
On Friday 31 October 2003 11:16, Buchan Milne wrote:
Robert L Martin wrote:
btw you might want to include how to tell the difference (like maybe the
win32 auto run reads linux-Mandrake 9.2a?)
It would be enough to make it say 9.2 ;-).
*lol*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert L Martin wrote:
| SomeDrake needs to post when the official LG-SAFE isos are ready (im
| going to assume that
| somebody yelled STOP THE PRESSES (aka via BF ARRÊTEZ LES PRESSIONS)
| when
My French is poor, but as far as I know, pression in
Jan Ciger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert L Martin wrote:
| SomeDrake needs to post when the official LG-SAFE isos are ready (im
| going to assume that
| somebody yelled STOP THE PRESSES (aka via BF ARRÊTEZ LES PRESSIONS)
| when
My French is poor, but as far as I know, pression in French
Jan Ciger wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert L Martin wrote:
| SomeDrake needs to post when the official LG-SAFE isos are ready (im
| going to assume that
| somebody yelled STOP THE PRESSES (aka via BF ARRÊTEZ LES PRESSIONS)
| when
My French is poor, but as far as I know,
Daouda LO wrote:
Really funny :))
Nice catch about the translation, Jan!
Roger, Arreter la presse (des CDS) is a better translation for
STOP THE PRESSE(S).
I just hope that somebody did yell whatever is correct or else
Dude, My cd drive is dead is going to be heard here in the US (Dell
uses
On Friday 31 October 2003 22:19, Robert L Martin wrote:
Daouda LO wrote:
Really funny :))
Nice catch about the translation, Jan!
Roger, Arreter la presse (des CDS) is a better translation for
STOP THE PRESSE(S).
I just hope that somebody did yell whatever is correct or else
Dude, My cd
GM Yeah, but I am trying to figure it all out right now. I am having a terrible
GM time getting MakeCD to run in anything other than auto mode. If I use the
GM config file, it won't build the iso.
The biggest problem for me is how to replace properly vmlinuz from kernel-boot
and initrd for it
Yeah, but I am trying to figure it all out right now. I am having a terrible
time getting MakeCD to run in anything other than auto mode. If I use the
config file, it won't build the iso.
The scripts are not well documented and everyone else that talks about doing
this skips so many
Hey,
I need a tracker for the files, anyone know of a good one???
Cheers,
Manu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emmanuel Moll wrote:
I'm using chrips' from http://norlug.org/~chipster/index.pxml?rpms
Hmm, do these have the l10n files? These packages were made after the
1.5 packages I made for Club (9.1 and 9.2) with corresponding galeon
(still in testing
Emmanuel Moll wrote:
I'm using chrips' from http://norlug.org/~chipster/index.pxml?rpms
Manu
I have noticed the norlug mozilla-1.5-1 bombs reliably on 9.2 when mail
is called from the browser status bar. I'd better let chipster know :-).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Coe wrote:
Emmanuel Moll wrote:
I'm using chrips' from http://norlug.org/~chipster/index.pxml?rpms
Manu
I have noticed the norlug mozilla-1.5-1 bombs reliably on 9.2 when mail
is called from the browser status bar. I'd better let
Buchan Milne wrote:
David Coe wrote:
Emmanuel Moll wrote:
I'm using chrips' from http://norlug.org/~chipster/index.pxml?rpms
Manu
I have noticed the norlug mozilla-1.5-1 bombs reliably on 9.2 when mail
is called from the browser status bar. I'd better let chipster know :-).
Works fine in
David Coe wrote:
Buchan Milne wrote:
David Coe wrote:
Emmanuel Moll wrote:
I'm using chrips' from http://norlug.org/~chipster/index.pxml?rpms
Manu
I have noticed the norlug mozilla-1.5-1 bombs reliably on 9.2 when mail
is called from the browser status bar. I'd better let chipster know :-).
Francisco Alcaraz ha scritto:
Yes I hope this, but not idea about when; I have downloaded
the new kernel (not problematic lg drivers, but I suppose
it is bugless tan the old one).
Well, it has (at least) one less feature: packet writing capability has
been omitted :-(
Bye
--
- Yo también
Francisco Alcaraz ha scritto:
Yes I hope this, but not idea about when; I have downloaded
the new kernel (not problematic lg drivers, but I suppose
it is bugless tan the old one).
Well, it has (at least) one less feature: packet writing capability has
been omitted :-(
well,
GM I think all you should have to do is replace the packages and then run some
GM scripts that update the package lists in the Mandrake/base directory.
GM gendistrib should be one, but I don't know of the others.
Have you considered adding a few remarks to your twiki page
like the need to use the
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 03:38 pm, Galileo wrote:
GM I think all you should have to do is replace the packages and then run
some GM scripts that update the package lists in the Mandrake/base
directory. GM gendistrib should be one, but I don't know of the others.
Have you considered adding
Right, I've created the ISOs, updated all the packages from the update
site. Have also updated Mozilla to version 1.5, included Thunderbird and
Firebird and updated k3b to 0.10. I'll bittorrent the isos tomorrow and
wil release them tomorrow.
Manu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emmanuel Moll wrote:
Right, I've created the ISOs, updated all the packages from the update
site. Have also updated Mozilla to version 1.5
If you're using my packages for mozilla 1.5, note that I didn't include
the 110n stuff, as it wasn't
Right, I've created the ISOs, updated all the packages from the update
site. Have also updated Mozilla to version 1.5, included Thunderbird and
Firebird and updated k3b to 0.10
and if you are using my k3b rpms,
1.) have in mind that there are 3 negative votes (without resons :( )
2.) and
I'm using chrips' from http://norlug.org/~chipster/index.pxml?rpms
Manu
P.S: Just realised that isolinux still uses the old kernel (with LG
problem). Tried to update it by copying vmlinuz across but then got a
CD-ROM access error.
Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
done :-)
Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
Right, I've created the ISOs, updated all the packages from the update
site. Have also updated Mozilla to version 1.5, included Thunderbird and
Firebird and updated k3b to 0.10
and if you are using my k3b rpms,
1.) have in mind that there are 3
Buchan Milne ha scritto:
Emmanuel Moll wrote:
Right, I've created the ISOs, updated all the packages from the update
site. Have also updated Mozilla to version 1.5
If you're using my packages for mozilla 1.5, note that I didn't include
the 110n stuff, as it wasn't available at the time.
With a
Take in account that gaim 0.68 can't manage the new MSN
protocol; 0.71 can.
Regards
Francisco Alcaraz
Murcia (Spain)
El Martes, 28 de Octubre de 2003 16:28, Emmanuel Moll
escribió:
Right, I've created the ISOs, updated all the packages
from the update site. Have also updated Mozilla to
They will be released as the previous isos, for MandrakeClub
members and via Bitorrent?
Regards
Francisco Alcaraz
Murcia (Spain)
El Martes, 28 de Octubre de 2003 16:28, Emmanuel Moll
escribió:
Right, I've created the ISOs, updated all the packages
from the update site. Have also updated
Unfortunately I do not work for Mandrake and have no associations with
them at all. I am just creating those CDs for myself and myself only. I
will be releasing to you guys through here because some people have
shown interest. I'll let u all know what has been updated but cannot
guarantee that
Sorry, I thought you were a member of Mandrake. Anyway if
the isos will be avalaible in a server to download I would
like to know their url, because I think the new official
isos aren't still prepared.
Thanks for offer your work to us, best regards
El Martes, 28 de Octubre de 2003 21:51,
Francisco Alcaraz kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Keskiviikko 29 Lokakuu
2003 01:43):
Sorry, I thought you were a member of Mandrake. Anyway if
the isos will be avalaible in a server to download I would
like to know their url, because I think the new official
isos aren't still prepared.
Well,
according to:
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/lgerrata.php3
quote
A new kernel (2.4.22-21mdk) has been released that fixes
this problem in the kernel, although the CD-ROM devices
are still not up to specification. New CDs and ISOs will
be available shortly to correct these
Right, won't release anything today, I'm going to wait for the kernel
that solves teh LG drives problem.
Manu
Emmanuel wrote:
Hi all,
More and more people I talk to about Mandrake are interested in trying
it out. Now, I'd like them to be able to try it out without having to
install 220MB of
On Saturday 25 October 2003 01:53 pm, Francisco Alcaraz wrote:
I am absolutely according with this; I am introducing lot of
people to use Mandrake and installing it in his computers,
but everythime we have to spend lot of time donwloading
updates; if every time updated isos were avalaible for
E Would it be possible to re-package the ISO with the updates included
E and/or point me towards instructions to tell me how to make the new ISO
Anybody considered adding this patch:
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/patches/9.2/pubkey/patch.pl
to fix this bug in installation :
Righto, the isos are created and I'm just about to test them. If I
cannot find any problems, I'll bittorrent them on Monday under the name
of Manudrake-9.2.1 (I'm fairly sure i cannot use the name Mandrake and
9.2.1 is better than 9.2SP1 (in my opinion)).
Also, since I'm a bit strapped for cash
Hey,
I had a quick look at the patch but I'm not sure how to apply it to the
tree. If you have any ideas, please let me know and I'll apply it no
problem.
Manu
Vedran Ljubovic wrote:
--- Emmanuel Moll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Righto, the isos are created and I'm just about to
test them.
On Sat, 2003-10-25 at 06:57, Emmanuel Moll wrote:
Righto, the isos are created and I'm just about to test them. If I
cannot find any problems, I'll bittorrent them on Monday under the name
of Manudrake-9.2.1 (I'm fairly sure i cannot use the name Mandrake and
9.2.1 is better than 9.2SP1 (in
I am absolutely according with this; I am introducing lot of
people to use Mandrake and installing it in his computers,
but everythime we have to spend lot of time donwloading
updates; if every time updated isos were avalaible for the
last distribution we could had a great and almost perfect
I am quite newbie with the whole signing the packages thingy. How do I
check all the packages signature and (if failed) how do i resign the
packages with a given signature???
Cheers,
Manu
P.S: Good feedback. I agree with getting new distro CDs every so often
and i am willing to do it (fast
On Sat, 2003-10-25 at 13:52, Emmanuel Moll wrote:
I am quite newbie with the whole signing the packages thingy. How do I
check all the packages signature and (if failed) how do i resign the
packages with a given signature???
You don't really want to resign anything, the objective in checking
Gerald Drouillard wrote:
I've got a ABIT KV7 mobo (KT600 chipset) with a VIA VT8237 SATA
controller and Maxtor SATA drive so can test a libata patched kernel.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lspci
RAID bus controller: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 3149 (rev 80)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lspci -n
00:0f.0 Class
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Mark Scott wrote:
Ah, yes, doing a modprobe sata_via makes the drive work. So I guess the
kernel doesn't need patching, but maybe updating (the last libata patch was
17th Oct). I don't know if this is reliable or not... I'll find out over
time :-)
AFAICS, this only
Hey,
I posted the original message. From what I've read, I need to download
the whole 9.2 tree, replace the old packages with the updated packages
and run makecd.
Is that correct??? If so, I'll create the ISOs this week-end.
Cheers,
Emmanuel
Emmanuel wrote:
Hi all,
More and more people I
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 03:15:55PM +0100, Emmanuel wrote:
Hey,
I posted the original message. From what I've read, I need to download
the whole 9.2 tree, replace the old packages with the updated packages
and run makecd.
Is that correct??? If so, I'll create the ISOs this week-end.
if
Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Mark Scott wrote:
Ah, yes, doing a modprobe sata_via makes the drive work. So I guess the
kernel doesn't need patching, but maybe updating (the last libata patch was
17th Oct). I don't know if this is reliable or not... I'll find out over
time :-)
Hi all,
More and more people I talk to about Mandrake are interested in trying
it out. Now, I'd like them to be able to try it out without having to
install 220MB of updates once it's installed (they're all mainly on
dial-up).
Would it be possible to re-package the ISO with the updates
On Thursday 23 October 2003 07:43 am, Emmanuel wrote:
Hi all,
More and more people I talk to about Mandrake are interested in trying
it out. Now, I'd like them to be able to try it out without having to
install 220MB of updates once it's installed (they're all mainly on
dial-up).
Would it
Le jeu 23/10/2003 à 11:43, Emmanuel a écrit :
Hi all,
More and more people I talk to about Mandrake are interested in trying
it out. Now, I'd like them to be able to try it out without having to
install 220MB of updates once it's installed (they're all mainly on
dial-up).
Would it be
On Thursday 23 October 2003 07:37 am, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
So do I. That's interest me.
I don't think we can do this just with makecd, and some updates are
interesting from the install ( I was thinking of kernel updates and
better ACPI/SATA support )
sata worked out of the box with silicone
On Thursday 23 October 2003 07:37 am, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
So do I. That's interest me.
I don't think we can do this just with makecd, and some updates are
interesting from the install ( I was thinking of kernel updates and
better ACPI/SATA support )
sata worked out of the box with
On Thursday 23 October 2003 05:56 am, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Thursday 23 October 2003 07:37 am, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
So do I. That's interest me.
I don't think we can do this just with makecd, and some updates are
interesting from the install ( I was thinking of kernel updates
On Thursday 23 October 2003 05:31 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
I think all you should have to do is replace the packages and then run some
scripts that update the package lists in the Mandrake/base directory.
gendistrib should be one, but I don't know of the others.
you dont need to run gendistrib
On Thursday 23 October 2003 05:56 am, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Thursday 23 October 2003 07:37 am, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
So do I. That's interest me.
I don't think we can do this just with makecd, and some updates are
interesting from the install ( I was thinking of kernel
Great idea - I was thinking the same.
At least for the download version (assuming it's too late for the
packaged version)
R.Fox
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 13:43, Emmanuel wrote:
Hi all,
More and more people I talk to about Mandrake are interested in trying
it out. Now, I'd like them to be able
Here are some suggestions for 9.2
- for the public release, you should release 9.2.1 isos that include the
updates AND also corrects the problem with LG drives. I don't think
Mandrakesoft can afford a public release of ISOs that kill CD drives. That
would be very bad for Mandrake reputation.
On Thursday 23 October 2003 06:40 am, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
don't play with HPT ! :)
AFAIK they don't have native SATA chip yet,
the cards are plain PATA 133 controlers with SATA bridges,
and acording to lkml are suported by the hpt374 driver (PATA133)
svetljo
thanks promise is doing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ef2 wrote:
Here are some suggestions for 9.2
- for the public release, you should release 9.2.1 isos that include the
updates AND also corrects the problem with LG drives. I don't think
Mandrakesoft can afford a public release of ISOs that kill
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 11:26, Buchan Milne wrote:
I wonder if it might be possible to only remaster the first ISO, as I
think most updates were to packages which are on CD1
Mmm, that would be nice.
Austin
--
Austin Acton
Synthetic Organic Chemist,
I wonder if it might be possible to only remaster the first ISO, as I
think most updates were to packages which are on CD1 (or do we split
kde*-devel off onto CD2 or 3?).
Regards,
Buchan
That's sound a very good idea : remaster the CD1 with the new CD1 packages,
and leave the updates that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ef2 wrote:
That's sound a very good idea : remaster the CD1 with the new CD1
packages,
and leave the updates that are on the other CDs on the updates mirrors.
All updates must be left on the mirrors. What about people that have
already installed
ef2 wrote:
I wonder if it might be possible to only remaster the first ISO, as I
think most updates were to packages which are on CD1 (or do we split
kde*-devel off onto CD2 or 3?).
Regards,
Buchan
That's sound a very good idea : remaster the CD1 with the new CD1 packages,
and leave the updates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lea Gris wrote:
That's sound a very good idea : remaster the CD1 with the new CD1
packages,
and leave the updates that are on the other CDs on the updates mirrors.
Wouldn't this be a dependancy break between updated CD1 + old CD2 CD3 ?
Only if
All updates must be left on the mirrors. What about people that have
already installed from the FTP mirrors (which also aren't likely to
change ...).
But, if a new CD1 were made, user's would automatically get the benefit
of them anyway (since urpmi would get the package from the CD first).
Buchan Milne wrote:
Only if 50MB is not enough to absorb the dependancies ...
But do you really need to remaster CD1 into a 700MB iso ? Do the
corrected packages increase the size that much ?
For the download edition, if you need some space, why not dropping the
kernel marcelo ? Do really
That's sound a very good idea : remaster the CD1 with the new CD1
packages,
and leave the updates that are on the other CDs on the updates mirrors.
Wouldn't this be a dependancy break between updated CD1 + old CD2 CD3 ?
No because all hdlist files are on CD1 and would be regenerated by
Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Thursday 23 October 2003 05:56 am, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Thursday 23 October 2003 07:37 am, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
I don't think we can do this just with makecd, and some updates are
interesting from the install ( I was thinking of kernel updates and
better
I've got a ABIT KV7 mobo (KT600 chipset) with a VIA VT8237 SATA
controller and Maxtor SATA drive so can test a libata patched kernel.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lspci
RAID bus controller: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 3149 (rev 80)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lspci -n
00:0f.0 Class 0104: 1106:3149 (rev 80)
71 matches
Mail list logo
