-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Montag, 3. November 2003, 12:32:58 Uhr MET, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I did start naming everyting version.92mdk to distinguish them from
cooker stuff (like we are doing for security updates now).
That's a start.
And I
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Montag, 3. November 2003, 10:18:57 Uhr MET, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Greg Meyer wrote:
Are we going to see updated ATI kernel modules for the 9.2 kernel updates?
wrong question, should be: are we going to see SRPMS for any
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Greg Meyer wrote:
Are we going to see updated ATI kernel modules for the 9.2 kernel updates?
wrong question, should be: are we going to see SRPMS for any version at
all. I'll be happy to recompile but am not going to duplicate the effort.
d.
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Montag, 3. November 2003, 10:18:57 Uhr MET, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Greg Meyer wrote:
Are we going to see updated ATI kernel modules for the 9.2 kernel updates?
wrong question, should be: are we going to see SRPMS for any
Am Montag, 3. November 2003, 11:39:35 Uhr MET, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Götz, you work to hard:)
Any objections if I put them on club (with obsoletes for the in-house
version?)
You can do everything the license permits. Please don't forget to
upload the source rpms to the club.
--
What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Montag, 3. November 2003, 11:39:35 Uhr MET, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Götz, you work to hard:)
Any objections if I put them on club (with obsoletes for the in-house
version?)
You can do everything the license permits.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Montag, 3. November 2003, 10:18:57 Uhr MET, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Greg Meyer wrote:
Are we going to see updated ATI kernel modules for the 9.2 kernel updates?
wrong question,
Am Montag, 3. November 2003, 11:04:53 Uhr MET, schrieb Eric Fernandez:
Danny, I have open a club request for these drivers
http://www.mandrakeclub.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=RPMfunc=info_pageRID=1611
Maybe you could link them to the entry ?
BTW, maybe that would be necessary to rename
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Montag, 3. November 2003, 11:39:35 Uhr MET, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Götz, you work to hard:)
Any objections if I put them on club (with obsoletes for the in-house
version?)
You can do everything the license permits. Please don't forget to
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Montag, 3. November 2003, 11:04:53 Uhr MET, schrieb Eric Fernandez:
Danny, I have open a club request for these drivers
http://www.mandrakeclub.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=RPMfunc=info_pageRID=1611
Maybe you could link them to the entry ?
On Monday 03 November 2003 05:48 am, Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Montag, 3. November 2003, 11:39:35 Uhr MET, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Götz, you work to hard:)
Any objections if I put them on club (with obsoletes for the in-house
version?)
You can do everything the license permits. Please
Am Montag, 3. November 2003, 12:32:58 Uhr MET, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I did start naming everyting version.92mdk to distinguish them from
cooker stuff (like we are doing for security updates now).
That's a start.
I would to raise another point here quickly, but it needs its own thread:
Are we going to see updated ATI kernel modules for the 9.2 kernel updates?
--
/g
Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read -Groucho Marx
On Sunday 02 November 2003 07:00 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
Are we going to see updated ATI kernel modules for the 9.2 kernel updates?
yes these are much more um well they are very needed.
--
-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
14 matches
Mail list logo
