Shift wrote:
Le Samedi 8 Février 2003 19:11, Charles A Edwards a écrit :
On Sat, 08 Feb 2003 09:33:09 -0800
George Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was unable to even
perform SysReq sync, remount, boot sequence and had to endure another
ugly root partition cleanup. Looks like
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, George Mitchell wrote:
an Athlon? That doesn't sound right at all. And as far as the person
who made the comment about 'end user whining', if the developers on this
list consider us loyal Mandrake users to be nothing more than 'whiners',
they are sticking their heads in
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 02:24, George Mitchell wrote:
Thanks for the tip. I will give it a try and report back. I have a
K6-2 450. However, I rather think that this should be autodetected by
the kernel if it is actually a problem. Also, I notice that someone on
down is claiming to still
On Sat, 08 Feb 2003 18:24:54 -0800
George Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the tip. I will give it a try and report back. I have a
K6-2 450. However, I rather think that this should be autodetected by
the kernel if it is actually a problem. Also, I notice that someone
on down
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
George Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
developers on this list consider us loyal Mandrake users to be nothing
more than 'whiners', they are sticking their heads in the sand and
/ why everytime people keep thinking that we don't listen /
Because thats
Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, George Mitchell wrote:
an Athlon? That doesn't sound right at all. And as far as the person
who made the comment about 'end user whining', if the developers on this
list consider us loyal Mandrake users to be nothing more than 'whiners',
they are
George Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
for one, much appreciate all of your hard work, especially regarding
supermount on the kernel side, but it would be nice to know a little
i didn't do anything in supermount (maybe in the very old and dark
time when the patch was based for kernel
Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Sat, 08 Feb 2003 09:33:09 -0800
George Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was unable to even
perform SysReq sync, remount, boot sequence and had to endure another
ugly root partition cleanup. Looks like there are still problems here
in spite of rumours to the
On Sat, 08 Feb 2003 09:33:09 -0800
George Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was unable to even
perform SysReq sync, remount, boot sequence and had to endure another
ugly root partition cleanup. Looks like there are still problems here
in spite of rumours to the contrary.
I an using
Charles A Edwards wrote:
I am I am guessing that you have an AMD cpu, if so add 'mem=nopentium'
to your lilo append and your lock-ups should cease.
could this be automatically added by drakconf uppon install. This should
save some average en user whinning (mandrakes sucks, it doesn't work on
Le Samedi 8 Février 2003 19:11, Charles A Edwards a écrit :
On Sat, 08 Feb 2003 09:33:09 -0800
George Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was unable to even
perform SysReq sync, remount, boot sequence and had to endure another
ugly root partition cleanup. Looks like there are still
Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Sat, 08 Feb 2003 09:33:09 -0800
George Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was unable to even
perform SysReq sync, remount, boot sequence and had to endure another
ugly root partition cleanup. Looks like there are still problems here
in spite of rumours to the
George Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
developers on this list consider us loyal Mandrake users to be nothing
more than 'whiners', they are sticking their heads in the sand and
/ why everytime people keep thinking that we don't listen /
Le Dimanche 09 Février 2003 04:13, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
George Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
developers on this list consider us loyal Mandrake users to be nothing
more than 'whiners', they are sticking their heads in the sand and
/ why everytime people keep thinking that we
Olivier Thauvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because some devel are know to never heard us, and never reply to mail.
Or reply without really consider our problems.
well some. but mostly for the kernel i always have been take care or
answered to questions.
Else it is not case for all. I won't
Le Dimanche 09 Février 2003 05:01, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
Olivier Thauvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because some devel are know to never heard us, and never reply to mail.
Or reply without really consider our problems.
I was not talking only about kernel.
well some. but mostly for the
16 matches
Mail list logo
