Re: [cooperation-wg] cooperation-wg Digest, Vol 53, Issue 16

Johan, >And sometimes they listen very selectively... :) Indeed ;) >The tricky ones are the ones where the views of the community >and the views of (some) governments are in conflict, and >activism, rather than education, is what is needed. In that >case we need to be very clear about who

Re: [cooperation-wg] cooperation-wg Digest, Vol 54, Issue 6

+1 Corinne Best, -Michael On Jul 14, 2016 3:29 PM, "Corinne Cath" wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to echo the sentiments by Gordon and Julf. It is a great loss > for the cooperation WG that Meredith has decided to step down, and I hope > she reconsiders. I cannot

[cooperation-wg] IXP Best Practice Forum

Dear colleagues, Building on last year's IGF Best Practice Forum (BPF) on enabling environments for establishing successful IXPs , this

Re: [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC's Response to CWG-Internet Open Consultation "Building an enabling environment for access to the Internet”

Hi Collin, I definitely think so. Especially if we can help translate why it isn't merely a technical function. That is, the Atlas program has many implications for business, civil society, and government as well -- each for different reasons. And it will only expand as more probes and anchors

Re: [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC's response to ITU SG20 Liaison Statement

Agreed Shane, on both fronts (+1 to the statement and +1 to the willingness to keep addressing similar (if not the same) issues by RIPE NCC). Best, -Michael On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Shane Kerr wrote: > All, > > I agree with Patrik, nicely written and I am

Re: [cooperation-wg] Seeking technical community candidates for IGF MAG

Hi Chris, To clarify the deadline, is it Dec. 6 or Dec. 16? Because it says Dec. 16 in the email but I'm not sure if there is a difference between the process in general vs. the process for the technical community. See you soon, -Michael On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Chris Buckridge

Re: [cooperation-wg] Seeking technical community candidates for IGF MAG

> Committee should be received no later than 6 December, giving the > Nomination Committee 10 days in which to decide on a set of agreed MAG > nominees to forward to the UN on 16 December. > > Hope that helps clarify things! > > Chris > > > > On 29 Nov 2016, a

Re: [cooperation-wg] Live blogging from RightCon in Brussels

Hi Vesna, Thank you for sharing these posts. It was a pleasure to meet you in person at RightsCon, and I particularly appreciated that RIPE NCC was participating and promoting the RIPE Atlas project. Keep up the great work! Best, -Michael __ Michael J. Oghia ICANN58 fellow

Re: [cooperation-wg] Fwd: (CGN) European Commission PQ response

Hi Malcolm, all: Thanks for sharing this. I encourage anyone interested in this topic and potential areas of collaboration to check out a session organized by the RIPE NCC's own Richard Learning at EuroDIG 2017 earlier this month: