Re: [COOT] mac 10.4 coot 5 error?

2008-10-02 Thread William G. Scott
If you have a .gtkrc-2.0 file specifying a font, comment that line out. On Oct 2, 2008, at 12:09 PM, Mark Collins wrote: Hi I want to know if the following error will affect the running of coot? It seems to start up fine except for this error. Thanks Mark I get the following error in

Re: [COOT] Atoms

2008-10-02 Thread William G. Scott
All un-fsck options should be non-default optional, lest they create other problems. On Oct 2, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Charlie Bond wrote: How straightforward would it be to modify coot to automatically 'run pdbset' on loaded pdb files to overcome this issue? Cheers, Charlie Lynn F. Ten Eyck

Re: [COOT] Coot 0.5 released

2008-09-25 Thread William G. Scott
Yes, I put coot 0.5.0 into fink cvs, both stable and unstable yesterday. Barring bug fixes, I won't touch the stable entry until 0.6 is released. fink selfupdate-rsync or fink selfupdate-cvs I've also built these on my 10.5 machines so they are available as fink binary debian packages.

Re: [COOT] Coot 0.5 released

2008-09-24 Thread William G. Scott
... Cheers, Dave 2008/9/24 Tim Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: We got one here at YSBL. Let me know what to do and I'll set it doing it. Given it came from Paul Kevin's grant from memory it seems only fair to use it this way! Cheers, Tim On 24 Sep 2008, at 16:08, William G. Scott wrote: Hi

Re: [COOT] Coot 0.5 released

2008-09-24 Thread William G. Scott
-coot, then that'd be great. (What compiler to use, etc.) A bit new to this, but eager to learn. Cheers, Dave 2008/9/24 William G. Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi David: I've got 10.5 covered, and 10.4 ppc (thanks to Luca Jovine!) is on its way. If you would help with 10.4 intel, that would

Re: [COOT] coot 0.5-pre-1-1391 stand-alone for intel OS X (10.5.4).

2008-09-13 Thread William G. Scott
2008, at 18:54, William G. Scott wrote: Hi folks: I've put a self-contained intel 10.5.4 coot here: http://tinyurl.com/coot-on-osx so stop with the death threats. If you use this, please make sure you have the latest X11.app from http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/xquartz I no longer have

Re: [COOT] fftw-shlibs vs fftw-mpi-shlibs (OS X)

2008-09-12 Thread William G. Scott
Dear Andreas et al: My post to the cootbb on this never made it. I've fixed the coot package to use gpp4, mmdb, ssm, clipper, and fftw(2) rather than ccp4-onlylibs-dev, which will cut down on the installation overhead in the future (these packages are minimal). fftw(3) is not compatible

[COOT] coot 0.5-pre-1-1391 stand-alone for intel OS X (10.5.4).

2008-09-12 Thread William G. Scott
Hi folks: I've put a self-contained intel 10.5.4 coot here: http://tinyurl.com/coot-on-osx so stop with the death threats. If you use this, please make sure you have the latest X11.app from http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/xquartz I no longer have access to OS X 10.4. I'll try to make

Re: [COOT] can coot link to fftw3?

2008-09-09 Thread William G. Scott
3.0.0, current version 3.7.0) On Sep 2, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Tim Fenn wrote: On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 07:27:17 -0700 William G. Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Kevin: My problem is this: If coot (the binary itself) links to fftw v. 2.1.5, it crashes, reporting a memory conflict error, upon

[COOT] can coot link to fftw3?

2008-09-02 Thread William G. Scott
If so, how do you tell configure? Thanks. William G. Scott Contact info: http://chemistry.ucsc.edu/~wgscott/

Re: [COOT] can coot link to fftw3?

2008-09-02 Thread William G. Scott
. 2.0.7, supplied by ccp4, it works properly. Any ideas? Bill William G. Scott Contact info: http://chemistry.ucsc.edu/~wgscott/ On Sep 2, 2008, at 6:58 AM, Kevin Cowtan wrote: No, it can't. Clipper only speaks to fftw v2. If fftw v2 is a problem, you can build clipper without fftw at all

Re: [COOT] fonts in coot 0.5 pre1

2008-08-08 Thread William G. Scott
You can make a file called ~/.gtkrc-2.0 and put in it gtk-font-name = Sans 10 (or whatever font size suits you). and for an OS-X native look, include /sw/share/themes/Glossy_P/gtk-2.0/gtkrc You can also create a system-wide version of the file /sw/etc/gtk-2.0/gtkrc and put those lines in

Re: [COOT] coot fink upgrade and gtk+2 issues

2008-08-01 Thread William G. Scott
Hi Jan: This is a bug in gtk+2 package. Issue fink remove gtk+2-dev and try the sudo apt-get install gtk+2 and hopefully that will make it right. Bill William G. Scott Contact info: http://chemistry.ucsc.edu/~wgscott/ On Aug 1, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Jan Abendroth wrote: Hi all, I did

Re: [COOT] coot and fink (Mac OS X)

2008-07-18 Thread William G. Scott
Hi Andreas: try fink reinstall gtkglext1 gtkglext1-shlib and if you have $LD_LIBRARY_PATH and/or $DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH set to anything, UNSET them (sorry, Paul). Bill On Jul 18, 2008, at 9:06 AM, Andreas Förster wrote: Update on Bill Scott's email from yesterday. On my system,

Re: [COOT] coot and fink (Mac OS X)

2008-07-18 Thread William G. Scott
I had not set $LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Changing it to /sw/lib and back didn't make a difference. $DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH is set to /Users/ andreas/Computer/ImageMagick-6.4.1/lib:/usr/local/ccp4-6.0.2/lib That's not expected to interfere with fink, is it? Setting DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH is usually poison.

Re: [COOT] gtk2 version for redhat

2008-04-16 Thread William G. Scott
I made an rpm using alien from my ubuntu debian Check the coot wiki William G. Scott (via iPod and gmail -- forgive the typos and brevity) Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Apr 16, 2008, at 1:31 PM, hari jayaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I noticed that there is no redhat gtk2 version

Re: [COOT] coot-0.5-pre-1-906

2008-04-04 Thread William G. Scott
Yes, I've seen this appear essentially at random. I don't have it on 10.5.2 intel but do on 10.4.11 intel. Moreover, 0.4.2 compiles ok but the newer one on that platform does not. I have not been able to figure out what is going wrong. There are some bugs in the iphone SDK -supplied

<    1   2