Re: [COOT] Coot Fink 10.15

2020-04-24 Thread William G. Scott
Hi Ed: I invested a lot of time into fink, so I was reluctant to let it go, but it might be time. When it was at its prime, it was the best-managed and and most science-oriented of the third-party package manager systems. MacPorts is another option I want to take a look at. To be honest, I

Re: [COOT] Coot Fink 10.15

2020-04-24 Thread Paul Emsley
Steady on. I hope that Bill and I can finagle coot into working with whatever gtk+ it has been provided. FWIW, Gtk+3 in the works and Gtk+4 is on the horizon. Paul. On 25/04/2020 03:35, Edward Miller wrote: Thanks, Bill, as always for the dedicated support. I've been a fink user,

Re: [COOT] Coot Fink 10.15

2020-04-24 Thread Edward Miller
Thanks, Bill, as always for the dedicated support. I've been a fink user, actually due to your packages, for at least ten years. Maybe it's time to switch to home-brew? Would they have more gtk+2 flexibility? Best, Ed Miller On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 4:52 PM William G. Scott wrote: > Hi Ed

Re: [COOT] Coot Fink 10.15

2020-04-24 Thread William G. Scott
Hi Ed (and COOT list): I’ve put updated info files here: http://scottlab.ucsc.edu/fink/finkupdate/ I’m trying to get these into fink as soon as possible, BUT there are two show-stopper problems: (1) The old refmac I have won’t compile with the newer versions of gcc, and we really need a new