On 09/11/2011 12:41, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote:
I looked at the core and sql changes and they are fine.
I will great a bug for these and submit the change-set.
Thanks Lance. I quickly scanned the changes in the Core and SQL webrevs
and they looks fine to me. Joe might want to look at the
On 10/11/2011 05:34, David Holmes wrote:
On 10/11/2011 3:03 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 09/11/2011 16:44, Mike Duigou wrote:
The change looks good.
The creation of node instances could use diamond. ie.
Yes, this was my initial reaction too.
Since Doug's CVS is also built with JDK6 I guess
On 10/11/2011 9:50 PM, Gary Adams wrote:
On 11/10/11 2:22 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Aside: it would be good if whomever is going to do the commits for you
could assist with publishing webrevs for these changes.
There was a bulk request to add Vivian's team to the openjdk
authors list that may
Changeset: d6a5da5f6ba0
Author:dl
Date: 2011-11-10 12:21 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/d6a5da5f6ba0
7107516: LinkedBlockingQueue/Deque.drainTo(Collection, int) returns
'maxElements' if its value is negative
Reviewed-by: chegar, mduigou, dholmes
!
On 11/ 8/11 11:13 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
Thanks for picking up this bug and fixing this intermittent issue.
PlatformLoggingMXBeanTest.java in the same directory has the same issue. It'd
be good to fix that with the same CR. These tests were copied from
Hello,
On 11/10/2011 1:29 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 09/11/2011 12:41, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote:
I looked at the core and sql changes and they are fine.
I will great a bug for these and submit the change-set.
Thanks Lance. I quickly scanned the changes in the Core and SQL
webrevs and
Le 10/11/11 16:24, Joe Darcy a écrit :
The Float and Double changes look fine. I don't know why the constructors
were coded up that way;
Maybe because the Float(String) / Double(String) constructors were coded in Java
1.0, while the parseFloat(String) / parseDouble(String) methods were added
Changeset: 830d2e46023a
Author:lancea
Date: 2011-11-10 11:41 -0500
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/830d2e46023a
7110111: Minor Java SE javadoc Constructor clean up
Reviewed-by: alanb, darcy
Contributed-by: Martin Desruisseaux martin.desruisse...@geomatys.fr
!
On 07/11/2011 11:42, Seán Coffey wrote:
currently not live on bugs.sun.com but hope to get it up there shortly :
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7091388
I'm porting fix for 7091388 forward to JDK8 (and then 7u)
This is a fix in the CDRInputStream_1_0.close()/
On 04/11/2011 13:08, Seán Coffey wrote:
ok,
so updated webrev at :
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.7105952.2/
some minor modifications :
* closed variable made private
* hg mv instead of rm/add for testcase
* testcase padded up some more.
* comments changed to block style format
10 matches
Mail list logo
