Hi Joe and Daniel
Thank you very much for your suggestions! Now I fully understand the rule(at
least I think so :P)
I will use a runWithAllPerm block surrounding the user setup code as Daniel's
way. Btw, Daniel, ThreadLocal should not need Atomic
any more, correct?
Frank
> -Original
On 26/07/16 00:53, huizhe wang wrote:
To avoid having to grant the permission, the test may choose to read the
property before setting the SecurityManager. You might not be able to
use TestNG Listeners in such case, or maybe you can by initializing the
properties before the test starts.
Or
I filed a couple of bugs. Here's a relevant JIRA search:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/issues/?jql=Subcomponent%20%3D%20java.lang%3Areflect%20AND%20watcher%20%3D%20martin
Because of the trickiness of local vs inner classes, Alex may want to make
a decision on the correct behavior.
On Fri, Jul
On 7/25/2016 2:46 AM, Frank Yuan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: huizhe wang [mailto:huizhe.w...@oracle.com]
Subject: Re: RFR (JAXP) JDK-8067170: Enable security manager on JAXP unit tests
On 7/22/2016 5:53 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
On 22/07/16 10:15, Frank Yuan wrote:
Hi Daniel
+1
On 7/25/2016 7:43 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
I don't have any more comments, +1
Stephen
On 25 July 2016 at 07:37, nadeesh tv wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for the comments.
Please see the updated webrev
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ntv/8066806/webrev.11/
Changes:
Wave 8 updated with urgent temporary fix for
8162396: j.u.c java.lang.LinkageError
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Martin Buchholz
wrote:
> Thanks! Done.
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Peter Levart
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> On
Hi Brian,
On 7/25/2016 1:05 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
A few more comments:
- Do you want to tag OIF as a functional interface? (I think yes,
you intend to use this with lambdas.)
ok
- Need explanation of what happens when someone returns UNDECIDED --
and perhaps some motivating
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the review and comments,
Updates in place:
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-serial-filter-jdk9-8155760/
SpecDiff:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/filter-diffs/overview-summary.html
Javadoc (subset)
Hi,
looking good. I believe you could also remove the comment sections after the
headers like:
/*
* $Id: Constants.java,v 1.7 2006/06/19 19:49:04 spericas Exp $
*/
But no need for new webrev for that, of course :-)
Best regards
Christoph
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Fuchs
Thanks Christoph. Fixed those headers. I wished to get these classes
free from warnings, but had to find a balance between fixing warnings
and adding too much noise to the patch. We could definitely make some
dedicated warning patches.
-Joe
On 7/25/2016 8:27 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
On 25/07/16 18:38, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi,
looking good. I believe you could also remove the comment sections after the
headers like:
/*
* $Id: Constants.java,v 1.7 2006/06/19 19:49:04 spericas Exp $
*/
But no need for new webrev for that, of course :-)
Thanks Christoph! I was
Hi,
Here is the later version of the fix:
- Header files fixed
- Bytecode 1.1 compatible
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8153082/webrev.02/
cheers,
-- daniel
On 25/07/16 16:16, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi Daniel,
yes, I just recognized the header is different everywhere. It is a
A few more comments:
- Do you want to tag OIF as a functional interface? (I think yes, you
intend to use this with lambdas.)
- Need explanation of what happens when someone returns UNDECIDED --
and perhaps some motivating explanation of why it is there at all,
rather than just returning
Hi Joe,
looking good to me at a glance and contains some nice cleanups/warning fixes.
But of course I'm not a reviewer.
I think in
src/java.xml/share/classes/com/sun/org/apache/xalan/internal/xsltc/compiler/FunctionCall.java
src/java.xml/share/classes/jdk/xml/internal/SecuritySupport.java
you
Hi Daniel,
yes, I just recognized the header is different everywhere. It is a good idea to
consult Joe on this - he was also giving me hints on how to do it correctly
when I was touching JAXP.
Best regards
Christoph
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Fuchs
Hi Alan,
On 23/07/16 07:57, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 22/07/2016 17:16, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi,
Please find below a fix for
8153082: Update XSTL compiler to generate classes that invoke addReads
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153082
This fix removes a dependency from java.xml to an
Roger,
Mainly looks good. Some comments on the spec:
- Use the Present Simple Tense consistently, e.g.
"Return*S* an ObjectInputFilter computed from a string of patterns."
- ObjectInputFilter. Was there a comment already on the use of links?
For example the following is showing in
Hi Christoph,
On 22/07/16 20:23, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi Daniel,
looks good to me.
Maybe you'll want to take the chance to update the apache headers in the xalan
files?
Thanks for your review!
I'm only an occasional wanderer in JAXP land - which files do you see
have an outdated
Hi Joe, Roger,
thank you for your replays. A have changed javadoc as Joe suggested
(hope I didn't missed any in-line comments) and added a bunch of "s" and
"The" to Returns and @return.
Hope now it looks better and more consistent:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~snikandrova/8021787/webrev.02/
I don't have any more comments, +1
Stephen
On 25 July 2016 at 07:37, nadeesh tv wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Thanks for the comments.
> Please see the updated webrev
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ntv/8066806/webrev.11/
>
> Changes: Included the suggestions of Stephen
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: huizhe wang [mailto:huizhe.w...@oracle.com]
> Subject: Re: RFR (JAXP) JDK-8067170: Enable security manager on JAXP unit
> tests
>
>
>
> On 7/22/2016 5:53 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> > On 22/07/16 10:15, Frank Yuan wrote:
> >> Hi Daniel
> >>
> >> Thank you
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for the comments.
Please see the updated webrev
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ntv/8066806/webrev.11/
Changes: Included the suggestions of Stephen
Thanks and regards,
Nadeesh
On 7/22/2016 3:38 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
These tests are expected to throw exceptions:
On 7/22/2016 5:53 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
On 22/07/16 10:15, Frank Yuan wrote:
Hi Daniel
Thank you very much for your review and the comments!
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Fuchs [mailto:daniel.fu...@oracle.com]
Subject: Re: RFR (JAXP) JDK-8067170: Enable security manager on JAXP
23 matches
Mail list logo