On Sun, 10 Apr 2022 20:28:16 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
>> 8186958: Need method to create pre-sized HashMap
>
> XenoAmess has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
> or a rebase. The pull request now contains 17 commits:
>
> - Merge branch 'master' into fix_8186958
> -
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 03:21:00 GMT, Glavo wrote:
> `java.time.LocalDate.EPOCH` was introduced in Java 9, but there is no
> corresponding `@since` in the javadoc. The absence of `@since` makes it
> impossible for IDEs to check for misuse of it, it may be misused by users
> targeting Java 8 and
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 22:15:22 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
> What subclasses of InputStream in the JDK do not override skip(n)?
>From a peek, the majority of subclasses do not override `skip(long)`. Most
>overrides are delegations or optimizations for random access structures; but
>there are some
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 22:19:18 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
>> @jmehrens what about this then?
>> I think it safe now(actually this mechanism is learned from Reader)
>
> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> add
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:39:52 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Without specific information about use cases, there isn't enough information
> to craft a good algorithm/solution and simplicity is preferred. The
> MAX_SKIP_BUFFER_SIZE is 2048 (not 8192).
>
> What subclasses of InputStream in the JDK do
> @jmehrens what about this then?
> I think it safe now(actually this mechanism is learned from Reader)
XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
add MIN_SKIP_BUFFER_SIZE
-
Changes:
- all:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 19:33:26 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
> 8284637: Improve String.join performance
This pull request has been closed without being integrated.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8169
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 21:35:39 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
>> 8284637: Improve String.join performance
>
> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> add jmh
JMH results shows not worthy. closed.
-
PR:
> A few additional enhancements aiming to improve VH performance in the
> interpreter:
>
> - Flatten `TypeAndInvokers`: adds a pointer to `VarHandle` (a small increase
> 40->48) but removes an object and an indirection on any instance actually
> used - and might avoid allocating the
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:33:53 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Supporting `IsoFields` temporal fields in chronologies that are similar to
>> ISO chronology. Corresponding CSR has also been drafted.
>
> Naoto Sato has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
> or a rebase. The
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:33:53 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Supporting `IsoFields` temporal fields in chronologies that are similar to
>> ISO chronology. Corresponding CSR has also been drafted.
>
> Naoto Sato has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
> or a rebase. The
> A few additional enhancements aiming to improve VH performance in the
> interpreter:
>
> - Flatten `TypeAndInvokers`: adds a pointer to `VarHandle` (a small increase
> 40->48) but removes an object and an indirection on any instance actually
> used - and might avoid allocating the
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 18:00:18 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
>> Is this change proposed as the result of some experience with particular
>> apps and streams or just observation of the implementation?
>>
>> Is there any information about what kind of underlying streams do not
>> support skip directly
>>
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:09:31 GMT, Ravi Reddy wrote:
> CloseInflaterDeflaterTest.java is failing intermittently(Observed once in
> macOS and Linux), testInflaterOutputStream() is added as an extra test as
> part of https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8278794. Disabling this test
> for now
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:09:31 GMT, Ravi Reddy wrote:
> CloseInflaterDeflaterTest.java is failing intermittently(Observed once in
> macOS and Linux), testInflaterOutputStream() is added as an extra test as
> part of https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8278794. Disabling this test
> for now
> Supporting `IsoFields` temporal fields in chronologies that are similar to
> ISO chronology. Corresponding CSR has also been drafted.
Naoto Sato has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in
by
CloseInflaterDeflaterTest.java is failing intermittently(Observed once in macOS
and Linux), testInflaterOutputStream() is added as an extra test as part of
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8278794. Disabling this test for now
before debugging any timing issues in Inflater.
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 13:43:39 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> This is the implementation of JEP 425: Virtual Threads (Preview); TBD which
> JDK version to target.
>
> We will refresh this PR periodically to pick up changes and fixes from the
> loom repo.
>
> Most of the new mechanisms in the
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 15:00:29 GMT, Volker Simonis wrote:
>> Add an API note to `InflaterInputStream::read(byte[] b, int off, int len)`
>> to highlight that it might write more bytes than the returned number of
>> inflated bytes into the buffer `b`.
>>
>> The superclass `java.io.InputStream`
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 22:58:19 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Is this change proposed as the result of some experience with particular apps
> and streams or just observation of the implementation?
just observation of the implementation of InputStream class and Reader class,
and somehow wonder why
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 15:37:19 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
> Please review this tiny fix.
>
> A test similar to the code proposed by the bug reporter has been added for
> the LXM group. It does not pass before the fix and passes after.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 15:37:19 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
> Please review this tiny fix.
>
> A test similar to the code proposed by the bug reporter has been added for
> the LXM group. It does not pass before the fix and passes after.
j.u.Random and j.u.SplittableRandom do _not_ expose
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 17:30:07 GMT, Jim Laskey wrote:
> All generators support the byte[] however many ignore the argument. "If
> byte[] seed is not supported by an
> [algorithm](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/18/docs/api/java.base/java/util/random/package-summary.html#algorithms)
>
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 15:37:19 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
> Please review this tiny fix.
>
> A test similar to the code proposed by the bug reporter has been added for
> the LXM group. It does not pass before the fix and passes after.
All generators support the byte[] however many ignore
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 15:37:19 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
> Please review this tiny fix.
>
> A test similar to the code proposed by the bug reporter has been added for
> the LXM group. It does not pass before the fix and passes after.
Not all random generators expose a (byte[])
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 15:37:19 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
> Please review this tiny fix.
>
> A test similar to the code proposed by the bug reporter has been added for
> the LXM group. It does not pass before the fix and passes after.
Are there any tests for corresponding issues in
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 06:36:29 GMT, Koichi Sakata wrote:
>> # Summary
>> Running jdeprscan with --help option causes an exception on any OSs when the
>> locale is ja, zh_CN or de.
>>
>> # How to reproduce this issue
>>
>> $ jdeprscan -J-Duser.language=ja --help
>> Exception in thread "main"
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 13:43:39 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> This is the implementation of JEP 425: Virtual Threads (Preview); TBD which
> JDK version to target.
>
> We will refresh this PR periodically to pick up changes and fixes from the
> loom repo.
>
> Most of the new mechanisms in the
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 03:21:00 GMT, Glavo wrote:
> `java.time.LocalDate.EPOCH` was introduced in Java 9, but there is no
> corresponding `@since` in the javadoc. The absence of `@since` makes it
> impossible for IDEs to check for misuse of it, it may be misused by users
> targeting Java 8 and
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:13:40 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> A few additional enhancements aiming to improve VH performance in the
>> interpreter:
>>
>> - Flatten `TypeAndInvokers`: adds a pointer to `VarHandle` (a small increase
>> 40->48) but removes an object and an indirection on any
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 03:21:00 GMT, Glavo wrote:
> `java.time.LocalDate.EPOCH` was introduced in Java 9, but there is no
> corresponding `@since` in the javadoc. The absence of `@since` makes it
> impossible for IDEs to check for misuse of it, it may be misused by users
> targeting Java 8 and
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 03:21:00 GMT, Glavo wrote:
> `java.time.LocalDate.EPOCH` was introduced in Java 9, but there is no
> corresponding `@since` in the javadoc. The absence of `@since` makes it
> impossible for IDEs to check for misuse of it, it may be misused by users
> targeting Java 8 and
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 15:37:19 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
> Please review this tiny fix.
>
> A test similar to the code proposed by the bug reporter has been added for
> the LXM group. It does not pass before the fix and passes after.
Marked as reviewed by bpb (Reviewer).
-
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 15:37:19 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
> Please review this tiny fix.
>
> A test similar to the code proposed by the bug reporter has been added for
> the LXM group. It does not pass before the fix and passes after.
Marked as reviewed by jlaskey (Reviewer).
Please review this tiny fix.
A test similar to the code proposed by the bug reporter has been added for the
LXM group. It does not pass before the fix and passes after.
-
Commit messages:
- 8283083: java.util.random L128X256MixRandom constructor fails to use byte[]
seed
Changes:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 03:21:00 GMT, Glavo wrote:
> `java.time.LocalDate.EPOCH` was introduced in Java 9, but there is no
> corresponding `@since` in the javadoc. The absence of `@since` makes it
> impossible for IDEs to check for misuse of it, it may be misused by users
> targeting Java 8 and
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 03:21:00 GMT, Glavo wrote:
> `java.time.LocalDate.EPOCH` was introduced in Java 9, but there is no
> corresponding `@since` in the javadoc. The absence of `@since` makes it
> impossible for IDEs to check for misuse of it, it may be misused by users
> targeting Java 8 and
> Add an API note to `InflaterInputStream::read(byte[] b, int off, int len)` to
> highlight that it might write more bytes than the returned number of
> inflated bytes into the buffer `b`.
>
> The superclass `java.io.InputStream` specifies that `read(byte[] b, int off,
> int len)` will leave
Hi,
This patch moves the handling of integral division overflow on x86 from code
emission time to parsing time. This allows the compiler to perform more
efficient transformations and also aids in achieving better code layout.
I also removed the handling for division by 10 in the ad file since
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 16:04:48 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Volker Simonis has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Adapted wording and copyrights based on @jaikiran review
>
>
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 16:07:15 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Volker Simonis has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Adapted wording and copyrights based on @jaikiran review
>
>
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 16:05:33 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Volker Simonis has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Adapted wording and copyrights based on @jaikiran review
>
>
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 03:21:00 GMT, Glavo wrote:
> `java.time.LocalDate.EPOCH` was introduced in Java 9, but there is no
> corresponding `@since` in the javadoc. The absence of `@since` makes it
> impossible for IDEs to check for misuse of it, it may be misused by users
> targeting Java 8 and
> This is a (preliminary) patch for javac implementation for the third preview
> of pattern matching for switch (type patterns in switches).
>
> Draft JLS:
>
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:27:11 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Not sure if that even matters - but there will be a slight change of
> behaviour here if `InternalLock.CAN_USE_INTERNAL_LOCK` is ever `false`.
> Instead of synchronizing on `in`, the `BufferedReader` will synchronize on
> `this`.
Good!
> Hi,
>
> This PR updates the VM implementation of the foreign linker, by bringing over
> commits from the panama-foreign repo.
>
> This is split off from the main JEP integration for 19, since we have limited
> resources to handle this. As such, this PR might fall over to 20.
>
> I've
> This PR contains the API and implementation changes for JEP-424 [1]. A more
> detailed description of such changes, to avoid repetitions during the review
> process, is included as a separate comment.
>
> [1] - https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/424
Maurizio Cimadamore has updated the pull
> This is a (preliminary) patch for javac implementation for the third preview
> of pattern matching for switch (type patterns in switches).
>
> Draft JLS:
>
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 22:11:34 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> here's a PR for a patch submitted on March 2020
>> [1](https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/4511638/webrev.04/) when Mercurial was
>> a thing.
>>
>> The patch has been edited to adhere to OpenJDK code conventions about
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 01:17:37 GMT, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> What's the status of this? The last comment reads as if this is good to go.
I believe we're still waiting for Martin to reply to the last comment:
> Maybe, you could also log a bug for a test addition and describe in it an
>
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 22:11:34 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> here's a PR for a patch submitted on March 2020
>> [1](https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/4511638/webrev.04/) when Mercurial was
>> a thing.
>>
>> The patch has been edited to adhere to OpenJDK code conventions about
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 01:15:33 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> > checkExactAccessMode -> checkAccessModeThenIsDirect
>
> Don't you still want "Exact" in there? That "access" check seems odd anyway
> as it only checks for one form of mismatch - should it not also check for
> `!exact &&
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 07:10:54 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/zip/ZipFile.java line 347:
>>
>>> 345: *
>>> 346: * @implNote This implementation returns an instance of
>>> 347: * {@link java.util.zip.InflaterInputStream}.
>>
>> What is the
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 16:03:08 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Volker Simonis has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Adapted wording and copyrights based on @jaikiran review
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/zip/ZipFile.java
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 05:31:49 GMT, Koichi Sakata wrote:
> # Summary
> Running jdeprscan with --help option causes an exception on any OSs when the
> locale is ja, zh_CN or de.
>
> # How to reproduce this issue
>
> $ jdeprscan -J-Duser.language=ja --help
> Exception in thread "main"
> # Summary
> Running jdeprscan with --help option causes an exception on any OSs when the
> locale is ja, zh_CN or de.
>
> # How to reproduce this issue
>
> $ jdeprscan -J-Duser.language=ja --help
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: can't parse
> argument number:
56 matches
Mail list logo
