Re: RFR: 8044740: Convert all JDK versions used in @since tag to 1.n[.n] in jdk repo

2014-06-04 Thread David Holmes
On 4/06/2014 1:38 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: I like seeing JDK as well... primarily because IDEs have the ability to show javadoc snippets when hovering over an element. It's good to see what product the version comes relates to. Yet, on the other hand, these Oracle APIs are not published under

Re: RFR: 8044740: Convert all JDK versions used in @since tag to 1.n[.n] in jdk repo

2014-06-04 Thread Lance Andersen
Hi Henry, I know you already have some feedback on the change. The RowSet Impl changes are fine Best Lance On Jun 3, 2014, at 9:22 PM, Henry Jen henry@oracle.com wrote: Hi, In an effort to determine APIs availability in a given version, it became obvious that a consistent way to

Re: RFR: 8044740: Convert all JDK versions used in @since tag to 1.n[.n] in jdk repo

2014-06-04 Thread Alan Bateman
On 04/06/2014 02:22, Henry Jen wrote: Hi, In an effort to determine APIs availability in a given version, it became obvious that a consistent way to express @since tag would be beneficial. So started with the most obvious ones, where we have various expression for JDK version, this webrev

Re: RFR: 8044740: Convert all JDK versions used in @since tag to 1.n[.n] in jdk repo

2014-06-04 Thread Sean Mullan
The security specific files look fine to me. --Sean On 06/03/2014 09:22 PM, Henry Jen wrote: Hi, In an effort to determine APIs availability in a given version, it became obvious that a consistent way to express @since tag would be beneficial. So started with the most obvious ones, where we

Re: RFR: 8044740: Convert all JDK versions used in @since tag to 1.n[.n] in jdk repo

2014-06-04 Thread Henry Jen
Thanks for all reviewing and feedbacks on core-libs-dev[1], I tried to respond to feedbacks with this email and send off to other mailing lists. I am wondering if jdk9-dev is the appropriate list for such a trivious but broad change, so that we can have one instead of many lists, and we still

RFR: 8044740: Convert all JDK versions used in @since tag to 1.n[.n] in jdk repo

2014-06-03 Thread Henry Jen
Hi, In an effort to determine APIs availability in a given version, it became obvious that a consistent way to express @since tag would be beneficial. So started with the most obvious ones, where we have various expression for JDK version, this webrev make sure we use @since 1.n[.n] for JDK

Re: RFR: 8044740: Convert all JDK versions used in @since tag to 1.n[.n] in jdk repo

2014-06-03 Thread Mike Duigou
You will need to include awt-dev and security-dev since this patch touches those areas as well. Other impacted groups I missed? I would like to see this all go back in one changeset to dev repo though as it would be a lot cleaner that way. I am concerned a bit that if we retain standard names

Re: RFR: 8044740: Convert all JDK versions used in @since tag to 1.n[.n] in jdk repo

2014-06-03 Thread Paul Benedict
I like seeing JDK as well... primarily because IDEs have the ability to show javadoc snippets when hovering over an element. It's good to see what product the version comes relates to. Yet, on the other hand, these Oracle APIs are not published under JDK branding but under the title Java SE.