On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:21:32 GMT, Jaroslav Bachorik
wrote:
>> How does it look in proc?
>
> This was based on
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/da860290c2657c0fb1de8c77c8dffdb35f1cf938/src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/internal/platform/CgroupV1Metrics.java#L149
>
> However, that metric is
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 11:50:25 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> I guess we could fit those events under `Operating System/Memory` and
>> `Operating System/Processor` categories.
>> What about I/O? Currently, there is only `Operating System/Network`
>> category. The options are:
>> * Add `Operating
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:26:44 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 11 commits:
>>
>> - Roll back conditional registration of container events
>> - Remove container events
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 11:55:48 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> I don't see this event field being set anywhere? Which Metrics API call is
>> this using?
>
> How does it look in proc?
This was based on
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:32:32 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> This is taken as reported by cgroups - I didn't want to change the semantics
>> so it does not confuse people familiar with cgroups.
>
> I don't see this event field being set anywhere? Which Metrics API call is
> this using?
How
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 12:14:33 GMT, Jaroslav Bachorik
wrote:
>> src/jdk.jfr/share/classes/jdk/jfr/events/ContainerCPUThrottlingEvent.java
>> line 44:
>>
>>> 42: @Category({"Operating System", "Container", "Processor"})
>>> 43: @Description("Container CPU throttling related information.")
>>>
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 12:03:12 GMT, Jaroslav Bachorik
wrote:
>> src/jdk.jfr/share/classes/jdk/jfr/events/ContainerMemoryUsageEvent.java line
>> 46:
>>
>>> 44: public final class ContainerMemoryUsageEvent extends AbstractJDKEvent {
>>> 45: @Label("Memory Pressure")
>>> 46:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:25:09 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 11 additional
>>
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:17:14 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 11 additional
>>
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:31:55 GMT, Jaroslav Bachorik
wrote:
>> With this change it becomes possible to surface various cgroup level metrics
>> (available via `jdk.internal.platform.Metrics`) as JFR events.
>>
>> Only a subset of the metrics exposed by `jdk.internal.platform.Metrics` is
>>
> With this change it becomes possible to surface various cgroup level metrics
> (available via `jdk.internal.platform.Metrics`) as JFR events.
>
> Only a subset of the metrics exposed by `jdk.internal.platform.Metrics` is
> turned into JFR events to start with.
> * CPU related metrics
> *
11 matches
Mail list logo
