On Wed, 4 May 2022 12:30:53 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
> This is the revised jsr166 refresh for jdk19. See
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8285450 and
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8277090. Out of caution, this PR
> removes the unrelated commits from original version.
Marked
On Wed, 4 May 2022 12:30:53 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
> This is the revised jsr166 refresh for jdk19. See
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8285450 and
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8277090. Out of caution, this PR
> removes the unrelated commits from original version.
Marked
This is the revised jsr166 refresh for jdk19. See
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8285450 and
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8277090. Out of caution, this PR
removes the unrelated commits from original version.
-
Commit messages:
- Redoing JDK-8277090 to avoid s
On Tue, 3 May 2022 23:10:44 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
>> This is the jsr166 refresh for jdk19. See
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8285450 and
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8277090
>
> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since t
On Tue, 3 May 2022 20:04:48 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/CompletableFuture.java line
>> 2153:
>>
>>> 2151:
>>> 2152: @Override
>>> 2153: public Throwable exceptionNow() {
>>
>> The unwrapping of CompletionExceptions should be documented
>
> This is the jsr166 refresh for jdk19. See
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8285450 and
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8277090
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Fix internal doc typos; thanks to Mart
On Tue, 3 May 2022 20:00:52 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Address review comments
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinWorkerThread.java
> line 76:
>
>> 74:
Hi Alan,
>Is this a Future implementation that doesn't implement the spec
>correctly? The get method shouldn't throw CancellationException if done
>and not-cancelled.
What you say makes sense. I should have checked this before I brought it up
but CancellationException is an IllegalStateExceptio
On Tue, 3 May 2022 15:32:27 GMT, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Address review comments
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/CompletableFuture.java line
> 2153:
>
>> 2
On Mon, 2 May 2022 13:33:33 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
>> This is the jsr166 refresh for jdk19. See
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8285450 and
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8277090
>
> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since t
On 03/05/2022 17:14, Jason Mehrens wrote:
Hi Doug,
In Future::exceptionNow() and Future::state() I would think we would want to
catch CancellationException since the implementation of the Future is not
known. Even though we pre-screen the state I would imagine there could be an
implementatio
.
Jason
From: core-libs-dev on behalf of Doug Lea
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 7:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RFR: 8277090 : jsr166 refresh for jdk19
This is the jsr166 refresh for jdk19. See
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK
On Mon, 2 May 2022 13:33:33 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
>> This is the jsr166 refresh for jdk19. See
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8285450 and
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8277090
>
> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since t
On Mon, 2 May 2022 13:33:33 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
>> This is the jsr166 refresh for jdk19. See
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8285450 and
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8277090
>
> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since t
On Mon, 2 May 2022 23:54:33 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/FutureTask.java line 222:
>>
>>> 220: throw new IllegalStateException("Task has not
>>> completed");
>>> 221: }
>>> 222: }
>>
>> I think the code will be more readab
On Sun, 1 May 2022 14:35:28 GMT, Rémi Forax wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Address review comments
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/FutureTask.java line 222:
>
>> 220:
> This is the jsr166 refresh for jdk19. See
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8285450 and
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8277090
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Address review comments
-
On Mon, 2 May 2022 10:42:35 GMT, Rémi Forax wrote:
>> Most AutoCloseables do not mention this in class-level javadocs. Is there a
>> reason you think this one should?
>
> close() is now equivalent to the method shutdownAndAwaitTermination() shown
> in the javadoc so i believe , replacing it wit
On Mon, 2 May 2022 10:23:01 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ExecutorService.java line
>> 138:
>>
>>> 136: * @author Doug Lea
>>> 137: */
>>> 138: public interface ExecutorService extends Executor, AutoCloseable {
>>
>> The class documentation should b
On Sun, 1 May 2022 14:37:43 GMT, Rémi Forax wrote:
>> This is the jsr166 refresh for jdk19. See
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8285450 and
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8277090
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ExecutorService.java line
> 138:
>
>
On Sun, 1 May 2022 10:53:55 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
> This is the jsr166 refresh for jdk19. See
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8285450 and
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8277090
src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ExecutorService.java line 138:
> 136: * @aut
On 5/1/22 08:29, Doug Lea wrote:
This is the jsr166 refresh for jdk19.
Seehttps://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8285450
andhttps://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8277090
Hopefully a harmless glitch: An initially bad merge with
(https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/bba456a8dbf9027e4b01
This is the jsr166 refresh for jdk19. See
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8285450 and
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8277090
-
Commit messages:
- whitespace
- sync with loom
- 8276202: LogFileOutput.invalid_file_vm asserts when being executed from a
read only
23 matches
Mail list logo
