On 20/12/2013 04:18, David Holmes wrote:
:
Increasing the timeouts seems okay but how confident are you that this
is sufficient for a wide range of platforms. In other tests we often
see timeouts of a few seconds get extended even further, so three
seconds is not so big.
Also the yield
This should probably be reviewed by the nio-dev folk.
Increasing the timeouts seems okay but how confident are you that this
is sufficient for a wide range of platforms. In other tests we often see
timeouts of a few seconds get extended even further, so three seconds is
not so big.
Also the
Hi all, a gentle reminder for review.
--
Thanks
kalyan
Ph: (408)-585-8040
On 12/2/13, 6:39 PM, srikalyan chandrashekar wrote:
Hi all, I am working on bug JDK-6963118
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6963118 .
Root Cause:
- Sensitive timing dependency between events in Main and
Hi all, I am working on bug JDK-6963118
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6963118 .
Root Cause:
- Sensitive timing dependency between events in Main and Sleeper threads
are causes for test failure.
Suggested Fix:
1) Main thread should wait for more than 1sec(made it 3sec) and check
