On 24/03/15 19:25, Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Chris Hegarty mailto:chris.hega...@oracle.com>> wrote:
3) "process reaper”, maybe
“Process-Reaper-“ + monotonically increasing ID ( similar to
ForkJoin worker threads, or other ). But I do accept
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Chris Hegarty
wrote:
>
> 3) "process reaper”, maybe
> “Process-Reaper-“ + monotonically increasing ID ( similar to
> ForkJoin worker threads, or other ). But I do accept that this
> is the existing name for the reaper threads.
>
Nothing interesting is
On 24 Mar 2015, at 17:32, Roger Riggs wrote:
...
>> 2) Can ProcessImpl.waitForProcessExit and its native counterpart be
>> removed? ( since its function is now performed through ProcessHandleImpl
>> )
> I'll look at that again; the two behaviors:
> 1) waiting for and reaping the exit value us
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the review and comments.
On 3/24/2015 10:42 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Roger,
I think the API is looking much better now ( just a few comments below on small
specific issues ), so I’ve taken a pass over the implementation changes in the
sandbox. Here are some comments:
1)
