Changeset: 8952a5f494f9
Author:ksrini
Date: 2012-01-03 08:27 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/8952a5f494f9
7123582: (launcher) display the -version and -XshowSettings
Reviewed-by: alanb
! src/share/bin/java.c
! test/tools/launcher/Settings.java
Changeset: 5e34726cb4bb
Author:ksrini
Date: 2012-01-03 08:33 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/5e34726cb4bb
7124443: (launcher) test DefaultsLocaleTest fails with Windows shells.
Reviewed-by: darcy
! test/tools/launcher/DefaultLocaleTest.java
- test/tools/launch
Hello core-libs-dev. Can someone please do a code review of the
following proposed fix for 6783209 : (fmt)Formatter doesn't support
width for %%.
Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpassani/6783209/0/webrev/
Bug URL: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6783209
The fix i
So you have a review from me.
I think you need to send this CR/webrev and request for approval to the
jdk7u-...@openjdk.java.net alias for 7u4
Or did you do that already? Hopefully we can fix this drop stuff before
12/12/12 and the end of the world. 8^{
-kto
On Dec 30, 2011, at 10:11 AM, J
On Dec 31, 2011, at 2:31 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 31/12/2011 01:31, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>> Just wondering if anyone has seen this testcase failure.
>> I'm using Fedora 9 x86.
>>
>> -kto
>> :
>>
>> Test DatagramChannel to INET socket
>> join 225.4.5.6 @ virbr0
>> Send message from 192.168.12
Changeset: 7a836147b266
Author:jjg
Date: 2012-01-03 11:37 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/7a836147b266
4881269: improve diagnostic for ill-formed tokens
Reviewed-by: mcimadamore
! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/parser/JavaTokenizer.java
! src/shar
If you meant this:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2011-December/001130.html
Yes, I've gotten the approval from Edvard.
Note that, the jaxp update itself (without the build change) was
approved for 7u2.
On 1/3/2012 11:16 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
So you have a review from me.
Adding to the review of jmm.h, that is modified in both the jdk part and the
hotspot part, these files should be identical, without any differences in
whitespace.
Also, regarding whitespace and indentation, the use TAB characters in many
files in the jdk patch makes jcheck complain (when trying
Both JEP 103 and JEP 108 are interesting to me because they remind me of
something I've discussed a couple of times with one of the engineers working on
the JDK at Apple. (I'll not name him solely because his input was a casual
'that sounds interesting' and I don't want to imply he endorses this
On 11/09/11 03:01, Jonathan Lu wrote:
> On 11/04/2011 01:26 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>> On 4/11/2011 2:53 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>>> On 4/11/2011 2:13 PM, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
Probably the difference isn't documented. I tried Solaris 10 and Ubuntu
10.03. The difference still exists.
>>
Where is the Mercurial URL for jdk7u-osx ?
2011/12/2 David Holmes :
>
>
>
> On 2/12/2011 11:30 AM, Paul Hohensee wrote:
>>
>> I agree. Be a good idea to ask for review from all the affected teams.
>> I _think_ core libs is the only one we missed, though.
>
>
> My concern is that there are a numbe
Hi,
We had some late submissions from our hack day participants. 2 more
patches. One (j.u.z.ZipEntry) is possibly a little more involved for
a warnings fix. It removes a usage of deprecated Date APIs in favour
of Calendar. However, the fix results in code that is very similar to
Apache Harmony
>> Where is the Mercurial URL for jdk7u-osx ?
>
>
> Same place as all the other repos :)
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-osx/
Nice, I'll try to build this one also :)
Cheers
Hi Stuart,
Thanks for picking up the review.
> - java/util/jar/JarFile.java
> - java/util/jar/Manifest.java [patch4]
> - java/util/logging/LogManager.java [patch2]
> - java/util/prefs/Preferences.java
> - java/util/prefs/XmlSupport.java
> - java/util/zip/ZipEntry.java [patch2]
>
> Did I get
Hi Frederik,
Your fix is already in a good shape!
src/share/vm/services/management.cpp:
It is better to have different diagnostic messages at lines 2181 and 2186
so that it is easy to find out what of the two lines caused an exception.
The messages would be better to be more specific.
T
On Monday 14 November 2011 03:40:01 am Jonathan Lu wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
>
> On 11/10/2011 11:09 AM, Kurt Miller wrote:
> > On 11/09/11 03:01, Jonathan Lu wrote:
> >> On 11/04/2011 01:26 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> >>> On 4/11/2011 2:53 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> On 4/11/2011 2:13 PM, Masayoshi Okut
Hi,
Attached is the latest LJC warnings patch. I've merged all of the
changes into a single patch. The one I'm unsure of the comments on
the @SuppressWarnings("deprecation") in the ZipEntry.java. I've been
fairly terse and just mentioned that it's using the date
methods/constructor.
Regards,
M
Typically JavaBeans changes went into Swing (now AWT) gate. I don't
think this really matter where to push this time assuming the changes
will be propagated to AWT repo in a few weeks.
Thanks,
Andrey.
On 12/1/2011 9:04 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 01/12/2011 16:33, Maurizio Cimadamore w
The change looks good to me as well.
Cheers,
Mario
Inviato da HTC
- Reply message -
Da: "Deven"
Data: mar, nov 29, 2011 02:55
Oggetto: Add Look&Feel support for AIX platform
A: "Neil Richards"
Cc: "Java Core Libs" ,
,
On 10/20/2011 11:10 PM, Neil Richards wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-
Changeset: 052dda3b5ce3
Author:dmeetry
Date: 2011-12-18 22:12 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/corba/rev/052dda3b5ce3
7046238: new InitialContext(); hangs
Summary: Synchronization on a single monitor for contactInfo parameters with
identical hashCode()
Reviewed-by: rob
Omair / Danesh,
Here are the bug IDs:
7117605 Danesh
7117612 Omair
Wiki has been updated.
http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJDK/JDK8+warning+cleanup+day+%282011-12-01%29
-Xiomara
> -Original Message-
> From: Omair Majid [mailto:oma...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 9:00
FYI - The London JUG did have java.util.regex listed, but we didn't
have time to produce a patch for that area, so no clash there -
Cheers, M
On 2 December 2011 12:18, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> cc'ing core-libs-dev as that is the place to discuss these changes. I see on
> the sign-up sheet [1] that
> There is a rawtypes warning on the "new ArrayList()". I can put a
> specific type as the return value should match
> "jv.getManifestDigests()", which is public so shouldn't be changed. I
Sorry that should read "I can't put a specific type...
>> I looked at the updated patch and it looks fine to me. There are other
>> classes
>> in j.u.jar and j.u.logging that also have warnings but fixing the warnings
I only submitted the ones that we managed to work on during the hack
day. If the team is happy to continue accepting fresh patches for
Hi,
> scan of the webrev. There are still a couple of raw type warnings in JarFile
> and several more in other classes in these packages so it's possible you
> don't have everything (I wasn't following that thread closely on jdk8-dev).
Question on a rawtypes fix. In one case there is method defi
All,
I've created a bug report to address a scalability problem with
BigInteger's staticRandom field. The problem is that the shared
staticRandom field causes bottlenecks with parallel code. The proposed
solution is to change the staticRandom field to a ThreadLocal and eliminate
the bottleneck by
> Michael - the Contributed-by line is usually the individual's name (+ mail
> address) or a list of names (and their mail addresses). I think Stuart is
> suggesting that this would be better than "London Java Community".
Okay, no problem:
Contributed-by: Prasannaa , Martijn Verburg
, Goerge_Albr
Hi, Brandon.
I am not a jdk8 Reviewer (http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8), but I am the
original author.
No time to check the spec now, but is precision ever applicable when the flag
'%' is provided? If it is, then old line 2726 should probably just be changed
to "print("%')".
Rather than
Hi Iris. Answers below:
On 1/3/2012 1:27 PM, Iris Clark wrote:
Hi, Brandon.
I am not a jdk8 Reviewer (http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8), but I am the
original author.
No time to check the spec now, but is precision ever applicable when the flag '%' is provided?
If it is, then old line 2
Hi Paul,
For some reason this email, despite being dated Dec 14, only just
appeared in my inbox on Jan 3!
On 14/12/2011 12:44 AM, Paul Ciprich wrote:
All,
I've created a bug report to address a scalability problem with
BigInteger's staticRandom field. The problem is that the shared
staticRan
On 4/01/2012 10:08 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Paul,
For some reason this email, despite being dated Dec 14, only just
appeared in my inbox on Jan 3!
Oops! I missed the fact a copy of this email also turned up on Dec 15
and that I already replied to it.
Comments still apply. Need to understa
Changeset: a07eef109532
Author:jjh
Date: 2012-01-03 17:18 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/a07eef109532
7046929: tools/javac/api/T6397104.java fails
Reviewed-by: jjg
! test/tools/javac/api/T6397104.java
32 matches
Mail list logo
