Re: RFR [9] 8132877: docs: replace tt tags (obsolete in html5) for java.naming

2015-08-05 Thread Daniel Fuchs
Hi Alexander, On 04/08/15 19:34, Alexander Stepanov wrote: Hello Daniel, The review was re-uploaded as specdiff indeed discovered a couple of unwanted changes (in 'InitialContext' and 'ReferralException'), so your and Pavel's recommendations were very useful, thanks. webrev (please update the

RE: Review request for JDK-8132660: Change jaxp unit test package name to be different with jaxp api

2015-08-05 Thread Frank Yuan
Hi Joe Thank you very much! Really good advice! I have adjusted as it, please re-check at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyuan/8132660/webrev.01/ Btw, I only applied this practice on unit test, not for functional test because Tristan still has a functional suite pending, I would unify the

Re: RFR [9] 8132877: docs: replace tt tags (obsolete in html5) for java.naming

2015-08-05 Thread Alexander Stepanov
Thanks! On 8/5/2015 11:14 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote: Hi Alexander, On 04/08/15 19:34, Alexander Stepanov wrote: Hello Daniel, The review was re-uploaded as specdiff indeed discovered a couple of unwanted changes (in 'InitialContext' and 'ReferralException'), so your and Pavel's recommendations

Re: RFR [9] 8132468: docs: replace tt tags (obsolete in html5) for java.io, java.lang, java.math

2015-08-05 Thread Alexander Stepanov
Hello Stuart, Please see the final version of File.java (please update the page) - just replacing tt with code in the mentioned places: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8132468/webrev.01/src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/File.java.udiff.html The specdiff reports for lang and io:

Re: Review request: JDK-8080108: [TEST_BUG] ERROR: No IPv6 address returned from platform

2015-08-05 Thread Chris Hegarty
On 04/08/15 13:53, Alexander Fomin wrote: Hi Chris On 04.08.2015 13:29, Chris Hegarty wrote: Alexander, Wow, that's a lot of boiler plate for a manual test. Surely a README.txt, or similar would be sufficient? I noticed that with your changes, now this test has a dependency on the

RFR [9] 8133040: docs: replace tt tags (obsolete in html5) for java.management

2015-08-05 Thread Alexander Stepanov
Hello, Could you please review the following fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133040/webrev.00 for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133040 specdiffs: java.lang.management - no changes detected:

Re: RFR [9] 8133040: docs: replace tt tags (obsolete in html5) for java.management

2015-08-05 Thread Alexander Stepanov
javax.management - one (expected) change in TabularDataSupport: (full package diff: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133040/javax.management/overview-summary.html) On 8/5/2015 8:22 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote: Hello, Could you please review the following fix:

Re: Review request: JDK-8080108: [TEST_BUG] ERROR: No IPv6 address returned from platform

2015-08-05 Thread Alexander Fomin
Hi Crhis On 05.08.2015 17:54, Chris Hegarty wrote: What is the problem with dependency on the jdk.desktop module? The problem is that you must have a java runtime image with the java.desktop module installed, to be able to run a core networking test that has got nothing to do with

RFR JDK-8022224: Intermittent test failures in sun/nio/cs/FindDecoderBugs.java, ,

2015-08-05 Thread Xueming Shen
Hi, Would you please help review the proposed change for JDK-804. issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-804 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/804/ The fix for this particular problem is at ln#135-#137. The rest is the clean to remove unused the code (was for

Re: RFR JDK-8022224: Intermittent test failures in sun/nio/cs/FindDecoderBugs.java, ,

2015-08-05 Thread Chris Hegarty
The change looks ok to me Sherman. Should the bug synopsis be updated? It looks like a test bug rather than a product one. -Chris On 5 Aug 2015, at 20:04, Xueming Shen xueming.s...@oracle.com wrote: Hi, Would you please help review the proposed change for JDK-804. issue:

Re: RFR [9] 8132468: docs: replace tt tags (obsolete in html5) for java.io, java.lang, java.math

2015-08-05 Thread Stuart Marks
Hi Alexander, The changes to File.java look good. Thanks for doing the specdiffs as well; it's a good way to verify that even with all these markup changes, specdiff didn't detect any changes to java.io.File at all. (I didn't look at other files; I'm presuming that others have.) s'marks On

Re: RFR (M/L): 8131168: Refactor ProcessHandleImpl_*.c and add implememtation for AIX

2015-08-05 Thread Volker Simonis
Hi, so here's the webrev which implements the new Info.commandLine() method (I chose 'commandLine() ' instead of 'cmdline()' or 'commandline()' because the other getters are camel case as well): http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2015/8131168.v4/ From the JavaDoc of the new method: *

RE: RFR 8124977 cmdline encoding challenges on Windows

2015-08-05 Thread Kirk Shoop
-Original Message- From: Xueming Shen [mailto:xueming.s...@oracle.com] Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 11:50 AM On 07/20/2015 10:22 AM, Kirk Shoop wrote: So when default system locale differs from the active one, we have different behavior on Linux and Windows. The new options allow a

Re: RFR JDK-8022224: Intermittent test failures in sun/nio/cs/FindDecoderBugs.java, ,

2015-08-05 Thread Martin Buchholz
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Chris Hegarty chris.hega...@oracle.com wrote: The change looks ok to me Sherman. Should the bug synopsis be updated? It looks like a test bug rather than a product one. Why do you say that? The JISAutoDetect charset is being fixed here, no? Sherman: Thanks

Re: Review request for JDK-8132660: Change jaxp unit test package name to be different with jaxp api

2015-08-05 Thread huizhe wang
Hi Frank, This looks good to me. Best, Joe On 8/5/2015 3:04 AM, Frank Yuan wrote: Hi Joe Thank you very much! Really good advice! I have adjusted as it, please re-check at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyuan/8132660/webrev.01/ http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Efyuan/8132660/webrev.01/ Btw,