On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 01:50:04 GMT, Dongbo He wrote:
> This creates a regression test for
> [JDK-8240734](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240734). This was
> once blocked
> by a time stamp issue which has been resolved by: [JDK-8276766
>
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 01:55:30 GMT, Dongbo He wrote:
>> This creates a regression test for
>> [JDK-8240734](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240734). This was
>> once blocked
>> by a time stamp issue which has been resolved by: [JDK-8276766
>>
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:21:20 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 425: Virtual Threads (Preview); TBD which
>> JDK version to target.
>>
>> We will refresh this PR periodically to pick up changes and fixes from the
>> loom repo.
>>
>> Most of the new mechanisms in
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:21:20 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 425: Virtual Threads (Preview); TBD which
>> JDK version to target.
>>
>> We will refresh this PR periodically to pick up changes and fixes from the
>> loom repo.
>>
>> Most of the new mechanisms in
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 13:18:14 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> This is a (preliminary) patch for javac implementation for the third preview
>> of pattern matching for switch (type patterns in switches).
>>
>> Draft JLS:
>>
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:21:20 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 425: Virtual Threads (Preview); TBD which
>> JDK version to target.
>>
>> We will refresh this PR periodically to pick up changes and fixes from the
>> loom repo.
>>
>> Most of the new mechanisms in
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:21:20 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 425: Virtual Threads (Preview); TBD which
>> JDK version to target.
>>
>> We will refresh this PR periodically to pick up changes and fixes from the
>> loom repo.
>>
>> Most of the new mechanisms in
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:21:20 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 425: Virtual Threads (Preview); TBD which
>> JDK version to target.
>>
>> We will refresh this PR periodically to pick up changes and fixes from the
>> loom repo.
>>
>> Most of the new mechanisms in
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:21:20 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 425: Virtual Threads (Preview); TBD which
>> JDK version to target.
>>
>> We will refresh this PR periodically to pick up changes and fixes from the
>> loom repo.
>>
>> Most of the new mechanisms in
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:21:20 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 425: Virtual Threads (Preview); TBD which
>> JDK version to target.
>>
>> We will refresh this PR periodically to pick up changes and fixes from the
>> loom repo.
>>
>> Most of the new mechanisms in
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:21:20 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 425: Virtual Threads (Preview); TBD which
>> JDK version to target.
>>
>> We will refresh this PR periodically to pick up changes and fixes from the
>> loom repo.
>>
>> Most of the new mechanisms in
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:21:20 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 425: Virtual Threads (Preview); TBD which
>> JDK version to target.
>>
>> We will refresh this PR periodically to pick up changes and fixes from the
>> loom repo.
>>
>> Most of the new mechanisms in
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:21:20 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 425: Virtual Threads (Preview); TBD which
>> JDK version to target.
>>
>> We will refresh this PR periodically to pick up changes and fixes from the
>> loom repo.
>>
>> Most of the new mechanisms in
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 19:34:33 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
> People rarely include JDK elements with package access in a javadoc run. That
> is why bugs in those elements' doc comments tend to remain unnoticed.
>
> There are many more bugs in the doc comments of the JDK elements with the
> package
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 19:34:33 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
> People rarely include JDK elements with package access in a javadoc run. That
> is why bugs in those elements' doc comments tend to remain unnoticed.
>
> There are many more bugs in the doc comments of the JDK elements with the
> package
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 19:34:33 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
> People rarely include JDK elements with package access in a javadoc run. That
> is why bugs in those elements' doc comments tend to remain unnoticed.
>
> There are many more bugs in the doc comments of the JDK elements with the
> package
People rarely include JDK elements with package access in a javadoc run. That
is why bugs in those elements' doc comments tend to remain unnoticed.
There are many more bugs in the doc comments of the JDK elements with the
package access than are addressed by this PR; I only included the
> @jmehrens what about this then?
> I think it safe now(actually this mechanism is learned from Reader)
XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
change to liach operation.
-
Changes:
- all:
> Supporting `IsoFields` temporal fields in chronologies that are similar to
> ISO chronology. Corresponding CSR has also been drafted.
Naoto Sato has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in
by
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 20:16:21 GMT, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
>> I ran `codespell` on the `src/java.base` directory, and accepted those
>> changes where it indeed discovered real typos.
>>
>> (Due to false positives this can unfortunately not be run automatically)
>>
>> The majority of fixes are
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 13:18:14 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> This is a (preliminary) patch for javac implementation for the third preview
>> of pattern matching for switch (type patterns in switches).
>>
>> Draft JLS:
>>
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 13:18:14 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> This is a (preliminary) patch for javac implementation for the third preview
>> of pattern matching for switch (type patterns in switches).
>>
>> Draft JLS:
>>
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 13:18:14 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> This is a (preliminary) patch for javac implementation for the third preview
>> of pattern matching for switch (type patterns in switches).
>>
>> Draft JLS:
>>
On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:31:43 GMT, Tagir F. Valeev wrote:
> See the bug description for details.
>
> I propose a simple solution. Let's allow ArraySpliterator to be non-SIZED and
> report artificial estimatedSize(), much bigger than the real one. This will
> allow AbstractSpliterator and
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:53:59 GMT, ExE Boss wrote:
>> Explicitly implement `remove` and `replace` in `IdentityHashMap` to compare
>> values by identity. Updated API documentation of these two methods
>>
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 05:58:32 GMT, liach wrote:
> Explicitly implement `remove` and `replace` in `IdentityHashMap` to compare
> values by identity. Updated API documentation of these two methods
>
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 12:16:53 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
>> I've stared at the javadoc for Class.isAssignableFrom and Class.isInstance
>> and if a non-null instance is used to get a non-null class they are PROBABLY
>> the same but it is far from clear. The implementations of both are at least
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 01:55:30 GMT, Dongbo He wrote:
>> This creates a regression test for
>> [JDK-8240734](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240734). This was
>> once blocked
>> by a time stamp issue which has been resolved by: [JDK-8276766
>>
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:07:09 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> I ran `codespell` on the `src/java.base` directory, and accepted those
> changes where it indeed discovered real typos.
>
> (Due to false positives this can unfortunately not be run automatically)
>
> The majority of fixes are in
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 12:31:24 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> method seems unused now
It's used by the SL API, which will follow later. I realize this may sound
complicated but it avoids more complicated splits.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8166
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 21:39:17 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> Alan Bateman has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Refresh
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Thread.java line 862:
>
>> 860: * @param start the starting
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 11:45:01 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 425: Virtual Threads (Preview); TBD which
>> JDK version to target.
>>
>> We will refresh this PR periodically to pick up changes and fixes from the
>> loom repo.
>>
>> Most of the new mechanisms in
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 11:25:09 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> I ran `codespell` on the `src/java.base` directory, and accepted those
>> changes where it indeed discovered real typos.
>>
>> (Due to false positives this can unfortunately not be run automatically)
>>
>> The majority of fixes are in
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:07:09 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> I ran `codespell` on the `src/java.base` directory, and accepted those
> changes where it indeed discovered real typos.
>
> (Due to false positives this can unfortunately not be run automatically)
>
> The majority of fixes are in
> This is the implementation of JEP 425: Virtual Threads (Preview); TBD which
> JDK version to target.
>
> We will refresh this PR periodically to pick up changes and fixes from the
> loom repo.
>
> Most of the new mechanisms in the HotSpot VM are disabled by default and
> require running
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 09:32:46 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> ProcessHandle/OnExitTest is vulnerable to misconfigured systems that do not
> reap zombies in a timely fashion.
> [JDK-8284282](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284282) describes
> this problem in detail.
>
> Until we figure
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 18:29:21 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
>> ProcessHandle/OnExitTest is vulnerable to misconfigured systems that do not
>> reap zombies in a timely fashion.
>> [JDK-8284282](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284282) describes
>> this problem in detail.
>>
>> Until we
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:07:09 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> I ran `codespell` on the `src/java.base` directory, and accepted those
> changes where it indeed discovered real typos.
>
> (Due to false positives this can unfortunately not be run automatically)
>
> The majority of fixes are in
Explicitly implement `remove` and `replace` in `IdentityHashMap` to compare
values by identity. Updated API documentation of these two methods to mention
such behavior.
-
Commit messages:
- Fix indent
- 8178355: IdentityHashMap uses identity-based comparison for values
39 matches
Mail list logo
