Thanks for all reviewing and feedbacks on core-libs-dev[1], I tried to
respond to feedbacks with this email and send off to other mailing lists.
I am wondering if jdk9-dev is the appropriate list for such a trivious
but broad change, so that we can have one instead of many lists, and we
still
The security specific files look fine to me.
--Sean
On 06/03/2014 09:22 PM, Henry Jen wrote:
Hi,
In an effort to determine APIs availability in a given version, it
became obvious that a consistent way to express @since tag would be
beneficial.
So started with the most obvious ones, where we h
On 04/06/2014 02:22, Henry Jen wrote:
Hi,
In an effort to determine APIs availability in a given version, it
became obvious that a consistent way to express @since tag would be
beneficial.
So started with the most obvious ones, where we have various
expression for JDK version, this webrev m
Hi Henry,
I know you already have some feedback on the change. The RowSet Impl changes
are fine
Best
Lance
On Jun 3, 2014, at 9:22 PM, Henry Jen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In an effort to determine APIs availability in a given version, it became
> obvious that a consistent way to express @since tag w
On 4/06/2014 1:38 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
I like seeing "JDK" as well... primarily because IDEs have the ability to
show javadoc snippets when hovering over an element. It's good to see what
product the version comes relates to.
Yet, on the other hand, these Oracle APIs are not published under
On 6/3/14 8:17 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
You will need to include awt-dev and security-dev since this patch touches
those areas as well. Other impacted groups I missed?
awt-dev is not all. This patch touches 2D and Swing code also.
so awt-dev, 2d-dev & swing-dev.
Those need to be pushed to 9/clie
I like seeing "JDK" as well... primarily because IDEs have the ability to
show javadoc snippets when hovering over an element. It's good to see what
product the version comes relates to.
Yet, on the other hand, these Oracle APIs are not published under "JDK"
branding but under the title "Java SE".
You will need to include awt-dev and security-dev since this patch touches
those areas as well. Other impacted groups I missed?
I would like to see this all go back in one changeset to dev repo though as it
would be a lot cleaner that way.
I am concerned a bit that if we retain standard names f
Hi,
In an effort to determine APIs availability in a given version, it
became obvious that a consistent way to express @since tag would be
beneficial.
So started with the most obvious ones, where we have various expression
for JDK version, this webrev make sure we use @since 1.n[.n] for JDK