On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:03:19 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Ichiroh Takiguchi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add null check
>
> My preference is to pass the unmodified LIBPATH in the environment in each of
> the three
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was
IMHO this is not hard to fix (we already have multiple proposals) and we'd
should have this test on AIX too.
Cheers, Thomas
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 6:23 PM Joe Darcy wrote:
> How about excluding the test from running on AIX?
>
> -Joe
>
> On 2/25/2022 7:07 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
> > On Wed, 23
How about excluding the test from running on AIX?
-Joe
On 2/25/2022 7:07 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
The test was failed by:
Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:51:08 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Ichiroh Takiguchi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add null check
>
> The piece I was missing is that the HotSpot AIX specific code, computes and
> sets LIBPATH
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:51:08 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Ichiroh Takiguchi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add null check
>
> The piece I was missing is that the HotSpot AIX specific code, computes and
> sets LIBPATH
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:51:08 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Ichiroh Takiguchi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add null check
>
> The piece I was missing is that the HotSpot AIX specific code, computes and
> sets LIBPATH
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:01:13 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Javac is compiling the source to a .class file. The contents of the
> `java.library.path` do not affect the class file generated. None of the code
> of the class is executed during compilation.
Yup. Not the best snippet to include. It is
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:01:13 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Ichiroh Takiguchi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add null check
>
> Javac is compiling the source to a .class file. The contents of the
> `java.library.path` do
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 07:16:42 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> If its the former, then the issue is that `libpath` is just outdated when we
> get around to use it? In that case, why not just re-aquiring LIBPATH when
> building up `expected`?
^This was my thought at first as well :-) but in my
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 19:59:46 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Ichiroh Takiguchi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add null check
>
> The changes seem ok, modifying both the LIBPATH passed in the environment and
> the expected
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was
> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
> The test was failed by:
> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>
> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following change
> was applied.
> JDK-8272600: (test) Use native "sleep" in Basic.java
>
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
