Re: [coreboot] [RFH] Native AMD fam10-15 support

2018-06-15 Thread qtux
On 15/06/18 13:51, Kyösti Mälkki wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:14 PM, qtux wrote: > >> >>>> Coreboot did work well, but froze sometimes when booting during the >>>> assigning resources step (more or less exactly after assigning the PCI >>

Re: [coreboot] [RFH] Native AMD fam10-15 support

2018-06-15 Thread qtux
On 15/06/18 02:42, Kyösti Mälkki wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 4:38 AM, qtux wrote: >> On 13/06/18 22:12, Kyösti Mälkki wrote: >> Hi, >> >> S3 is __not__ working on my KCMA-D8. The last time I tried, I had to >> remove the power cord for a couple of

Re: [coreboot] [RFH] Native AMD fam10-15 support

2018-06-13 Thread qtux
On 13/06/18 22:12, Kyösti Mälkki wrote: > Hi > > Now that we wiped out K8, I'd like to put my eyes on fam10-15 boards. > > Couple questions for board owners: > > First, about asus/kcma-d8 and asus/kgpe-d16: Do these have working S3 > support? I remember rumours they originally worked at some

Re: [coreboot] [RFH] Status of the Lenovo X201

2018-05-18 Thread qtux
On 03/05/18 21:51, qtux wrote: > I uploaded a status report for the X201 and it contains the smashed > stack message. Since then I booted several times but was not able to > reproduce this stack smashing issue. It seems like that this kind of > error occurs only once after flashing.

Re: [coreboot] [RFH] Status of the Lenovo X201

2018-05-03 Thread qtux
> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 11:09 AM Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.mal...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 8:53 PM, Nico Huber <nic...@gmx.de> wrote: >>> On 02.05.2018 18:37, qtux wrote: >>>> Thanks for your detailed explanation. So in esse

Re: [coreboot] [RFH] Status of the Lenovo X201

2018-05-02 Thread qtux
hese cases to solve the issue until the next time I tinker with coreboot (in particular experimenting with me_cleaner seems to cause this issue quite often). Cheers, Matthias On 02/05/18 00:42, Nico Huber wrote: > On 02.05.2018 00:03, qtux wrote: >> ... >> ACPI Warning: SystemIO

Re: [coreboot] [RFH] Status of the Lenovo X201

2018-05-01 Thread qtux
Maybe these are also caused by copy pasting Sandy Bridge code as I found a reference to PMIO and GPIO with matching addresses in src/southbridge/intel/bd82x6x/acpi/pch.asl. Do you have any ideas on this issue? Cheers, Matthias On 01/05/18 19:35, qtux wrote: > Beware that patch is incompl

Re: [coreboot] [RFH] Status of the Lenovo X201

2018-05-01 Thread qtux
On 01/05/18 18:45, Kyösti Mälkki wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 6:46 AM, qtux <m...@qtux.eu> wrote: >> I wrote a patch [0] for the finalize code issue. With that my X201i is >> working fine on current master besides an regression introduced in commit >> 7f5efd

Re: [coreboot] [RFH] Status of the Lenovo X201

2018-04-29 Thread qtux
I wrote a patch [0] for the finalize code issue. With that my X201i is working fine on current master besides an regression introduced in commit 7f5efd90e598320791200e03f761309ee04b58a3 [1]. With that regression USB and SD card is not working anymore and it raises the following errors: [

[coreboot] Lenovo X201i not booting and not resuming from S3 due to SMM finalize

2018-04-19 Thread qtux
Hello, I found that after updating my Lenovo X201i the commit d533b16669a3bacb19b2824e6b4bc76a2a18c92a [1] causes a freeze during boot. Additionally, if INTEL_CHIPSET_LOCKDOWN is disabled (and thus booting works), resuming from S3 does not work anymore. I found that the following patch