Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

taii...@gmx.com wrote: > >>> 3. Support for Secure Boot - would one approach be simpler than another? > >> SB was invented by MS for DRM, it serves no real security purpose IMO > > > > I'd like to ask you to reconsider that opinion. > > It is a fact not an opinion. You wrote "IMO", otherwise I

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

Hello Taiidan, taii...@gmx.com: > On 04/12/2018 11:43 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: >> taii...@gmx.com wrote: 3. Support for Secure Boot - would one approach be simpler than another? >>> SB was invented by MS for DRM, it serves no real security purpose IMO >> I'd like to ask you to reconsider that

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

On 04/12/2018 11:43 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: > taii...@gmx.com wrote: >>> 3. Support for Secure Boot - would one approach be simpler than another? >> SB was invented by MS for DRM, it serves no real security purpose IMO > I'd like to ask you to reconsider that opinion. > It is a fact not an

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:18 PM, <eche...@free.fr> wrote: > > - Mail d'origine - > De: Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> > À: coreboot@coreboot.org > Envoyé: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 17:43:48 +0200 (CEST) > Objet: Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT > > ... > &g

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

> Is it possible to go from BIOS/UEFI to UBOOT (on-board)? How? Actually, since you are using, after all, YOCTO Project to build your BDX-DE BSP, you can freely use U-Boot, if Bin Meng (U-Boot BSP maintainer) already integrated BDX-DE/Camelback CRB's FSP into U-Boot. If? Bin, Did you integrate

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

Hi, On 11 April 2018 at 16:39, Raymond Yeung wrote: > > I currently have a board that uses Intel Xeon D (previously codenamed > Broadwell DE). It boots up with BIOS/UEFI. I 'm exploring other oot-up > options here. > > > I'm not familiar with this early stage of system

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

taii...@gmx.com wrote: > > 3. Support for Secure Boot - would one approach be simpler than another? > > SB was invented by MS for DRM, it serves no real security purpose IMO I'd like to ask you to reconsider that opinion. Secure Boot is mandated by Microsoft to provide Microsoft and

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

At this point, on this platform, I think your fastest bet to mostly open sourcing it all is linuxboot. We recently had an experience where we installed a linux kernel in FLASH on two new boards in two days and most of that was just figuring out how to rearrange the UEFI bits, (i.e. move the

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

gt; to already have this aspect covered. > > > Raymond > > > > > *From:* David Hendricks <david.hendri...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 11, 2018 6:03 PM > *To:* Raymond Yeung &g

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

On 04/11/2018 09:54 PM, Raymond Yeung wrote: > Thanks David for the detailed response. > > > My main motivation to go down Coreboot/UBOOT route is to attempt to simplify > the remaining boot-up to Linux. Instead of using PXE-BOOT, we could use tftp > only. Am I correct to say that? If you

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

April 11, 2018 6:03 PM To: Raymond Yeung Cc: coreboot@coreboot.org Subject: Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Raymond Yeung <rksye...@hotmail.com<mailto:rksye...@hotmail.com>> wrote: I currently have a board that uses Intel Xeon D (previously coden

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

On 04/11/2018 06:39 PM, Raymond Yeung wrote: > I currently have a board that uses Intel Xeon D (previously codenamed > Broadwell DE). It boots up with BIOS/UEFI. I 'm exploring other oot-up > options here. Let us know what you are attempting to accomplish. > I'm not familiar with this early

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Raymond Yeung wrote: > I currently have a board that uses Intel Xeon D (previously codenamed > Broadwell DE). It boots up with BIOS/UEFI. I 'm exploring other oot-up > options here. > > > I'm not familiar with this early stage of system

[coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

I currently have a board that uses Intel Xeon D (previously codenamed Broadwell DE). It boots up with BIOS/UEFI. I 'm exploring other oot-up options here. I'm not familiar with this early stage of system initialization. It seems BIOS/UEFI to Linux needs to use PXE, with the need to configure