Pádraig Brady wrote:
...
> I'll push the attached (complete with new test and doc adjustments) soon.
...
Nice. I was going to say it looked impeccable,
but then noticed a nit at the end of the test.
Thanks!
> diff --git a/tests/readlink/multi.sh b/tests/readlink/multi.sh
...
> +readlink link1 li
On 12/13/2012 08:47 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 12/13/2012 05:34 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
...
The awkward/somewhat redundant -n, --no-newline option
is handled in the same way as on BSD and the help text adjusted like:
- -n, --no-newline do not output the trail
On 12/14/2012 06:33 PM, Assaf Gordon wrote:
Hello,
Related to the updated coverage documentation, perhaps update the ".gitignore"
to ignore the generated coverage files?
Another possible addition is ignoring "src.lcov", "lib.lcov" and "lcov-html/*"
- but those file names are not fixed, just th
On 12/14/2012 07:35 PM, Assaf Gordon wrote:
> Bernhard Voelker wrote, On 12/14/2012 03:29 AM:
>> On 12/13/2012 08:29 PM, Assaf Gordon wrote:
>>
>>> [PATCH 1/2] doc: mention "git stash" in HACKING
>>
>> I tweaked the commit message a bit: even if the change is trivial
>> and the subject is HACKING,
Hello John,
Eric Blake wrote, On 12/14/2012 04:19 PM:
> On 12/14/2012 02:02 PM, john wrote:
>>
>> In particular I wish to enter text into predefined (fixed location)
>> fields in a record as opposed to variably delimited fields. In other
>> words emulate the punched card record where card columns
On 12/14/2012 02:02 PM, john wrote:
>
> In particular I wish to enter text into predefined (fixed location)
> fields in a record as opposed to variably delimited fields. In other
> words emulate the punched card record where card columns are assigned to
> particular data character columns. Thos
Gentlemen;
In the course of trying to emulate some simple data processing functions
of the early mainframe era, I was surprised they weren't readily
supported by current standard tools.
In particular I wish to enter text into predefined (fixed location)
fields in a record as opposed to vari
Bernhard Voelker wrote, On 12/14/2012 03:29 AM:
> On 12/13/2012 08:29 PM, Assaf Gordon wrote:
>
>> [PATCH 1/2] doc: mention "git stash" in HACKING
>
> I tweaked the commit message a bit: even if the change is trivial
> and the subject is HACKING, it's good practice to mention it in a
> line below
Hello,
Related to the updated coverage documentation, perhaps update the ".gitignore"
to ignore the generated coverage files?
Another possible addition is ignoring "src.lcov", "lib.lcov" and "lcov-html/*"
- but those file names are not fixed, just the recommended file names in
HACKING .
-gordo
Hello Bernhard,
Bernhard Voelker wrote, On 12/14/2012 03:29 AM:
> splitting the discussion about the 2 patches ...
>
> On 12/13/2012 08:29 PM, Assaf Gordon wrote:
>> [...]
>> The second changes parameters for 'lcov' example - the current parameters
>> produce wrong output (the source files are no
On 12/14/2012 01:53 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> The "--devdebug" option can be used to show internal states (perhaps
>>> will be removed once the program is finalized?).
>
> Yes we may remove, or at least not document.
If you choose to not document it, then name it '---devdebug' (yes, with
three
It's been time to run misspellings again, but
the only 2 new mistakes came from me, sorry ...
;-/
Have a nice day,
Berny
>From 9c506806fa3904fba60d9f67f381cf90fe6f1e69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bernhard Voelker
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:45:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] maint: fix typos found by
On 12/14/2012 05:38 AM, Assaf Gordon wrote:
Hello,
Attached is a slightly improved patch - minor code changes, and many more tests.
Line coverage is 98%, and branch coverage is now >93% , and most of the
non-covered branches are simply unreachable (I'm checking the reachable ones).
The comment
splitting the discussion about the 2 patches ...
On 12/13/2012 08:29 PM, Assaf Gordon wrote:
> [...]
> The second changes parameters for 'lcov' example - the current parameters
> produce wrong output (the source files are not found, with LCOV version 1.9 ).
Thanks.
> [PATCH 2/2] doc: tweak 'lcov
splitting the discussion about the 2 patches ...
On 12/13/2012 08:29 PM, Assaf Gordon wrote:
> The first mentions 'git stash' in a relevant paragraph.
> [...]
Thanks.
> [PATCH 1/2] doc: mention "git stash" in HACKING
I tweaked the commit message a bit: even if the change is trivial
and the subj
15 matches
Mail list logo